yet another source saying keely did indeed use quartz bowls and these frequencies to
used) and subsequent harmonics thereof to much higher frequencies. Keely first noted thisdissociation by placing water in a quartz bowl and then
vibrating the bowl at these specificfrequencies using his tuning forks. The water completely vanished
I have found this assertions at basically every site supporting Keely I've run across. This information is taken from the biography of keely written
by the lady that was his primary investor. I don't understand why you so vehemently deny this when it's a key claim in the Keely mythos. It also
states pretty plainly that Keely was using normal tuning forks not Etheric vibrations to accomplish this. I"m really honestly trying to understand
this but you are directly contradicting what primary sources of keely information say.
Ok so what are etheric vibrations?
Secondly you do realize you are contradicting yourself as you said the other day that it was harmonies of 3 notes combined....
Also an ultrasonic transducer is just one way to generate the frequency needed. You could very easily generate the same frequency with a tuning fork
or other instrument.
I think you are MAKING it complicated so you can excuse yourself from actually trying it. You have contradicted yourself time and again throughout
this conversation first refering to keely technology as simple and now that we're down to the wire and someone's actually asking you to prove this
simple yet powerful technology it then becomes complex.
I'm trying to have a civilized discourse here and actually learn something, but instead you keep moving the goal posts.
I will say this though my want to believe that Keely may have discovered something amazing is slowing waning due to the way you and russian scientists
respond to me and my questions. Especially when I contrast the behavior and mannerisms of Keely believers with say Tesla advocates.
Myself being a Tesla advocate I am working slowly but surely at building a testbed Tesla turbine with which to test and prove out Tesla's assertions.
I"m hoping to eventually use it as my steam turbine for generating power from the LLoyd Tanner Friction Boiler I am working on. But here's the key,
I'm actually working to prove that Tesla was telling the truth about his turbine by demonstrating a working model myself. I am not asking people to
take my word for it. Nor do I attack people who disbelieve or think differently than I do. When people ask me for information about the tesla turbine
I don't send them links showing tesla coils or T henry Moray's work. I send them links showing the Tesla turbine and giving the best information I can
To Contrast this with the Keely believers I've encountered in this thread, when I ask for links or supporting material I get Youtubes about everything
from Stan Deyo to viktor Schauberger saying that they discovered similar things. While that's nice and all, and I'm a huge fan of schauberger myself,
it doesn't teach me anything about KEELY! I asked about Keely not schauberger and stan deyo. When I asked you guys to show me water disassociation
you instead showed me other things and or told me rudely to prove Keely's work myself. I just don't get it.
All I was really looking for was some education and ideally a proof showing Keely was indeed onto something amazing. Instead I got dissembling,
misdirection, and angry attacks. I have given and will continue to give you opportunities to show me something convincing that proves keely was onto
something major. If it's not water disassociation that you guys can show me then politely lead me to other experiments that will demonstrate key Keely
concepts. Show me some of Keely's work. Heck even admitting that you don't have the funds or facilities or the expertise necessary to test the water
disassociation would be a start.
Do any of these things and I'll be happier than I am now with the situation. You are the advocates of this man and his work. The burden of proof is on
you not me. I eagerly await civilized discourse and shared knowledge.
edit on 18-7-2012 by roguetechie because: (no reason given)