It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

new type of censorship found

page: 1
4
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 12 2012 @ 11:24 PM
link   
a new form of censorship has been found,

it involves a web page to be seaded with trigger words,
those words can be found on the words watch list released by the government recently,
at this stage it is unclear how the key words are being injected to the web pages,

but simply reading the article involved will get you on a terrorist watch list
i will not link for obvious reasons


in this way the unwitting reader is then legally allowed to be tracked and followed with there internet useage captured and stored.

you dont need to comit any crime to then be followed

the article this was found in was about state tracking laws broken by the state at a high profile web sight

so now simply by clicking on a link, you can legally be spied on

xploder
edit on 12-7-2012 by XPLodER because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 12 2012 @ 11:28 PM
link   
Ummm .... really?

This is nothing new.



posted on Jul, 12 2012 @ 11:30 PM
link   
Source/Link?

I can't just take anyones word at face value, no offense.



posted on Jul, 12 2012 @ 11:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by GeisterFahrer
Ummm .... really?

This is nothing new.


no you dont understand,

reading through the article out of place words that are on the watch list were inserted,
this gives them the right to track your internet usage,

these words were out of place and out of context for the article.

anyone reading the article just lost there right to privacy

i cant even say the web address because anyone going there will also be put on the list

i have to self censor

xploder



posted on Jul, 12 2012 @ 11:33 PM
link   
reply to post by Uniceft17
 


the words were out of place for the article,
they were on the terrorist word watch list published latly

i cant publish the link knowing people will go take a look

this causes me to self censor

xploder



posted on Jul, 12 2012 @ 11:37 PM
link   
If this is the case, arent we all in trouble already for reading the list a few weeks back?

I still dont see how they can have a right to track you, because of something you clicked on, and maybe or maybe didnt read



posted on Jul, 12 2012 @ 11:37 PM
link   
the article was about how government serveylence had broken the law and there was many many different words seaded into the article to the point it was obvious

anyone going there will be tracked as a suspect of interest

i will not release the url unless mods give me go ahead

xploder



posted on Jul, 12 2012 @ 11:40 PM
link   
reply to post by morder1
 


they were key words inserted into a story,
the words would be taken very seriously by law enforcement,
considering their meaning and cross meaning,

very serious words that would get swat at your door if you wrote them in that order (spaced out between words)

looks like a set up of some sort

xploder



posted on Jul, 12 2012 @ 11:42 PM
link   
Oh come on man. You are just being paranoid about looking at porn.



posted on Jul, 13 2012 @ 12:05 AM
link   
moved to skunk works?
wtf?

what i have seen scared the hair to stand up on the back of my neck.

it looked like a blatent attempt to force readers to stop reading any further,
it contained at least 12 words of a highly dangerous nature scattered around inside the article,

i swear if you read the article you would freak out,
i know i did

mods why has this been moved?
xploder



posted on Jul, 13 2012 @ 12:08 AM
link   

Originally posted by morder1
If this is the case, arent we all in trouble already for reading the list a few weeks back?

I still dont see how they can have a right to track you, because of something you clicked on, and maybe or maybe didnt read


the order and meaning of the words,
it was obviosly "placed" into the text
it was scary to put together the out of place words into a semi readable sequence

mods if you doubt me ill u2u the link!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

xploder



posted on Jul, 13 2012 @ 12:12 AM
link   
reply to post by XPLodER
 





i swear if you read the article you would freak out, i know i did


Dude share it. I'm not even remotely worried about reading text on a page. You've sufficiently warned people. It sort of seems like your making this up but I recall trusting you for some reason.



posted on Jul, 13 2012 @ 12:18 AM
link   

Originally posted by Domo1
reply to post by XPLodER
 





i swear if you read the article you would freak out, i know i did


Dude share it. I'm not even remotely worried about reading text on a page. You've sufficiently warned people. It sort of seems like your making this up but I recall trusting you for some reason.


here is a screeny as proof
if the mods ok it i will post the link



xploder



posted on Jul, 13 2012 @ 12:20 AM
link   
reply to post by Domo1
 


this is creepy,
there are words on the page that are out of place and dont belong in there at all
you can find them because they are out of place and out of context for the article

note the originating article (source) shows no out of place words

xploder



posted on Jul, 13 2012 @ 12:25 AM
link   
reply to post by XPLodER
 


Mkay that's creepy. I almost wonder if it's just the author being a smart ass about those buzzwords. It certainly rubbed me the wrong way. Good find. Or the author copier I suppose.

This should be taken out of Skunk Works now. I want to scrounge some more.
edit on 13-7-2012 by Domo1 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 13 2012 @ 12:35 AM
link   
reply to post by Domo1
 


i too want this taken out of skunk untill we can asertain if this was intentional by the author,
or weather this was inserted after publication

please can i get an answer mods?

xploder



posted on Jul, 13 2012 @ 12:37 AM
link   
reply to post by XPLodER
 


I would just go and hit ALERT on your OP and ask. Now that there is something tangible it should be changed, at least until more info is forthcoming. Going to attempt to contact author?



posted on Jul, 13 2012 @ 12:39 AM
link   
reply to post by Domo1
 


best way to proove how much that 2 billion dollar data is needed,
is to inflate figaurs of people reading pages with those words on them

NSA, you see a ten fold increase of people reading terrorist propaganda has occoured,
senate intelligence comity we better triple your budget then

lol


xploder



posted on Jul, 13 2012 @ 12:41 AM
link   
reply to post by Domo1
 


the author is listed as anonomous on the source sight
not sure if this is an over reaction on my part,
but my creep meter is going off

xp



posted on Jul, 13 2012 @ 12:45 AM
link   
reply to post by Domo1
 


i remember reading about document tracking the govenment is using that is white on white,
the idea behind it was to track the desimination of information and to track its spread

xploder



new topics

top topics



 
4
<<   2 >>

log in

join