It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NorEaster
Originally posted by xyankee
reply to post by stanguilles7
That is were you are wrong. This was a county I once loved, but because of liberals and progressives, it has become a county I can't stand, and if we don't get back to the basics of what makes this county great, I want no part of it.
There are banana republics where a guy can have your version of the American Dream (no community responsibility whatsoever) just south of here. Mexico is good if you have enough cash, and so are some of the other Latin America countries. If you have the money, you can live like a king down there. Hell, on the west coast of mexico, there are entire cities that are populated by retired US ex-patriots living the Tea Party dream, with rent a cops to keep the brown skins in line.
If you can actually remember a time when this nation wasn't progressive, then you're probably as old and dusty as white dog sh*t anyway, so you should look into one of the these little hideaways. They love the white haired white folks. Good for steady money and low drama.
edit on 7/13/12 by xyankee because: (no reason given)
So it is conjecture to call it Statism when a representative of that State in the form of health and human services has mom's lunch replaced by corporate McNuggets because the State thinks it knows better about nutrition? Maybe it is you who should redefine what you think is normal. I guess that is what happens when society gets used to the outrageous interventions of the State.
“If a parent sends their child with a Coke and a Twinkie, the child care provider is going to need to provide a balanced lunch for the child,”
Oh yes, I was explaining the relationship between the State's desire to control and regulate our thoughts and the State's desire to control what we eat. It is well spelled out in Jonah Goldberg's book, "Liberal Fascism", where he explains that the nanny state or fascism has it's roots in the Progressive movement and the Progressives' desire to control every aspect of our lives "for our own good".
Yes Michelle and Obama are both Statists extroardinaire but reserve for themselves the best of everything.
2. The incident you described,only occurred once, and was deemed a misunderstanding. Clearly whoever was "inspecting" these lunches failed to do so properly and reasonably.
Originally posted by xyankee
reply to post by xyankee
Yea, your right, it is a real shame that you yuppy pussies, who have no idea of hard work, freedom, and honor of your fellow neighbors, came and screwed the entire country. Look at where the economy is, look at the amount of laws you need to prevent someone from being offended or god forbid inconvenienced by another.
you can take your political correctness that your type needs and stuff it in your @&&. It was honest, hard working, old men that built this country. So why don't you take your poor excuse of a man and go to mexico, we were here long before you.
Originally posted by Openeye
reply to post by Juggernog
If you have to ask you didn't read my post.
Again this only happened ONCEedit on 13-7-2012 by Openeye because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Juggernog
Originally posted by Openeye
reply to post by Juggernog
If you have to ask you didn't read my post.
Again this only happened ONCEedit on 13-7-2012 by Openeye because: (no reason given)
I read it and so what.
This is the beginning of a trend. Next it will be backpack inspections at the schools entrance, then patdowns.
Then, when schools complain that theyre overwhelmed and cant afford the expenses anymore, they will assign TSA agents to help them out.
Wait and see, its already been done at a HS prom
No one is going to be patting down preschoolers and kindergartners.
Originally posted by Kang69
Respect no one just because they have a high position of power. People always say respect the President.. blah blah. Yeah, respect the president while hes shoving his Marxist agenda down your throat. The whole Obama family is full of #. She shouldn't be shot, just sent to a desolate island where she can think long and hard.
1. Because there is no law that says that the children have to eat these so called "corporate McNuggets" over the food which was prepared for them by their parents.
. The incident you described,only occurred once, and was deemed a misunderstanding. Clearly whoever was "inspecting" these lunches failed to do so properly and reasonably.
Originally posted by Openeye
reply to post by Juggernog
I will say it again...conjecture.
No one is going to be patting down preschoolers and kindergartners.
Inspecting lunches to see if their parents are actually feeding them...reasonable.
And as for TSA style pat downs, those already go down at High Schools all over the country. Maybe that because at the high school I went to people got stabbed, and in others near where I lived shot. So metal detectors and random searches in high school may be reasonable if the environment warrants it.
No law and yet that employee made the child eat McNuggets instead of mom's lunch.
There must be a school policy somewhere that dictated this....
How do you know it's just once? Perhaps it was only reported once.
It's not the State's responsibility to make sure mom's home packed lunch is nutritionally balanced.