Originally posted by Ookie
OK. So they've done it again. They have made a really shoddy remake. "Total Recall". And what did they do? They took out the boobies. No bare 3 breasted woman, no Sharon Stone topless, nothing. This is getting to be a trend and it ruining movies. I watched "I Robot" and had to look at Will Smith's bare butt yet again, but when it was time to see the cute leading lady in, the shower did not show anything. WTF? Then in "I am Legend" we had to sit through Will Smith's bare butt again. But not a glimpse of the leading ladie's boobs. In "Omega Man" we got to see the hot little black chick's boobs. It was part of what made that movie better than the new one.
I know that film makers are trying to get a PG-13 rating, but we can be subjected to a man's bare ass but not a boob? How is that right in any way? Boobs should be required in EVERY movie. Especially these awful chick flicks. It would make them bearable for the men who are forced to sit through them. I was forced to sit through "Mama Mia" and had to be subjected to that tripe, yet not one of the women in the movie showed a thing! How can that be legal?
They are going to have to bring back female nudity in movies before people start seeing movies again. I am so sick of being forced to see naked men and no boobs. "Terminator 3" Showed us once again Arnold Swartzenegger nude, but when it came time to see the hot female terminator it was too dark to see anything. How is that right? How does that sell tickets to movies made for men? Most men are not perverts who want to see other men nude. They want the boobies. But we do not get the boobies. Are ALL filmmakers queer?
I am not even going to try to see the new "Total Recall" movie because of the lack of boobs. It just would not be right. In fact, unless I am certain there will be boobs in a movie, I will not go see it at all. I suggest we all boycott it and all other movies that won't give men what they want. If you're a man and do not want to see the leading ladies boobs then you're gay and you're opinion doesn't count.
I even watched "Eurotrip" the other day hoping to see the cute chick's boobs. All we saw was her back. Big deal. What a let down. Then it was "Death Race 2000". No boobs again. The original had both Sylvester Stallone getting beat up by Kung-Fu guy and boobs. Made it a classic. The new one? It sucked. "Fast Times at Ridgemont High" had plenty of boobs. But if they remake it I can promise it will suck because there won't be any boobs. Even "16 Candles" had boobs. "Weird Science" had boobs. But new movies? No way. No freaking way.
I do not get it. Why ruin good movies by not showing the boobs? There should be a law that no actress can be in more than 2 movies without a boob scene that shows more than a side boob. I went and endured "I love you Beth Cooper" because of the promise that cute little chick from Heroes was topless in it. What did we get? NOTHING. I wanted my money back but they would not give it to me just because there were no boobs in it.
Can anyone explain why females won't do the right thing and show us the goods anymore? I just can't comprehend why so many classic movies have to be ruined by not having nudity. It just makes no sense.
Originally posted by pierregustavetoutant
Doesn't netflix have an adult only section?
I agree. more boobs = better film
Originally posted by TheLieWeLive
How about "Harold and Kumar Escape From Guantanamo Bay"?
The bottomless party scene.
I didn't expect that.
edit on 11-7-2012 by TheLieWeLive because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Manhater
Yeah, I'm having hard time looking for a movie on Netflix myself.
Least I don't have your problem
You know it's not all about boobs ya know...
Dang, go to a strip bar.
edit on 11-7-2012 by Manhater because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ManicDepresive1
They "SUCK" because it the same regurgitated B.S. that we have seen before... Is their no writers with an.......how does Spongebob say it... "IMAGINATION" anymore?