2012 Presidential Election: Make your own Electoral College Map (early predictions)

page: 2
6
<< 1   >>

log in

join

posted on Jul, 16 2012 @ 12:18 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 




posted on Jul, 16 2012 @ 12:27 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jul, 16 2012 @ 12:34 PM
link   
reply to post by xuenchen
 


The Valued Added Tax is alive and well in Europe.

Paul Krugman let the cat out of the bag a few years ago.

--------
The Electoral College Map would change significantly if that truth was spoken

by Obama.



posted on Aug, 9 2012 @ 06:17 PM
link   
It's been about a month since I made this post...so I thought a little update was due.

Here is the RCP Electoral College Map as of right now.



You'll notice there have been some changes since the original post.

Obama has gone from 221 to 247...a net gain of 26 (MI and WI) electoral votes and puts him only 23 away from the 270 needed to win.

Romney has gone from 181 to 191...a net gain of 10 (MO) electoral votes and puts him 79 electoral votes away from 270.

It's really not looking good for Romney. There are only 100 electoral votes that are not counted as leaning toward Obmaa or Romney already...and Romney needs 79 of those 100 to win. Not impossible...but he has a very narrow path to be able to pull this off.

There is still a lot of time left...but things seem to keep moving in Obama's favor.



posted on Aug, 10 2012 @ 09:38 AM
link   

Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
It's been about a month since I made this post...so I thought a little update was due.

Here is the RCP Electoral College Map as of right now.



You'll notice there have been some changes since the original post.

Obama has gone from 221 to 247...a net gain of 26 (MI and WI) electoral votes and puts him only 23 away from the 270 needed to win.

Romney has gone from 181 to 191...a net gain of 10 (MO) electoral votes and puts him 79 electoral votes away from 270.

It's really not looking good for Romney. There are only 100 electoral votes that are not counted as leaning toward Obmaa or Romney already...and Romney needs 79 of those 100 to win. Not impossible...but he has a very narrow path to be able to pull this off.

There is still a lot of time left...but things seem to keep moving in Obama's favor.


I wouldn't start dancing in the end zone just yet.


They have some different numbers over at USA Today.com.

Obama 196 --- Romney 191

- USA Today Electoral Tracker - Obama in trouble



posted on Aug, 10 2012 @ 10:19 AM
link   
reply to post by Eurisko2012
 



I wouldn't start dancing in the end zone just yet.

They have some different numbers over at USA Today.com.

Obama 196 --- Romney 191


No one is dancing...just presenting facts.

USA Today haven't moved WI, MI, PA, and NM into the Obama column yet...that is their choice...and I guess it's your choice to find the best poll to back up your own beliefs.

RCP uses all polls and averages them...I use RCP for everything...you jump around to whatever poll currently favors the person you support.


But just for your own reference...here is the current RCP averages for the States USA Today hasn't move to Obama yet.

WI - Obama +5.4
MI - Obama +6.3
PA - Obama +7.0
NM - Obama +10.7
edit on 10-8-2012 by OutKast Searcher because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 10 2012 @ 10:24 AM
link   
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
 


There is the truth. RCP uses ALL polls.

Most of the polls are shamelessly - stacked - with Democrats.


You're better off going to USA Today for a clear picture of where we are.

BTW, i see Romney taking North Carolina, Virginia, Florida, Ohio, Wisconsin

and Colorado.

That adds up to 285 Electoral Votes for President Mitt Romney.


He only need 270.



posted on Aug, 10 2012 @ 10:51 AM
link   
reply to post by Eurisko2012
 


You are free to have your own bias.


And your analysis of how the electoral votes will end up is certainly a valid prediction...it will be interesting to see how it all turns out.





top topics
 
6
<< 1   >>

log in

join