posted on Jul, 14 2012 @ 10:11 AM
Well it matters very much that we protect our rights to free speech, 100%.
However this is something else that anyone who writes something that under their new fascism may be deemed slanderous or libelous: slander or
libel does not exist for anything that a reasonable person would naturally think, and that is not a average unresearched person, that is specific to
what is reasonable to assume given your circumstances and your research.
So, if 9/11 was not an inside job (I'm using this as an example), and I knew it was while watching it live and when next spoke with my friend, she new
too. How did we know. Logic and reasoning. We knew that the cia/black op guerillas take out all democracies (the call them left) in South Amercia,
in the middle east, and set up dicatorships and kill all the educated or university students off (just good business decisions think, the shares go up
in the stockmarket, because they are all evil heartless demons in training). If you look at the history of the elite, and corporations and the
governments which break the trust of the people who hire them and cater to them, the chance of being wrong is less 1% by logic alone and the
actual events that have happened and been reported and investigated on the news media since I was a child.
Some of us can think perfectly well and connect dots just fine.
In this case: money is missing. The poster is certainly within his/her scope to suggest it was taken by whoever had proximity to the funds, and his
comment was NOT LIBEL OR SLANDER, BUT A REASONABLE OPINION.
If any judge were to find otherwise, go over their head and up the chain of command of (these employees, underscore that one to infinity, for they are
hired in a position of trust) to ensure they don't get to take away or water down our rights.
edit on 14-7-2012 by Unity_99 because: (no reason