It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
As a result there seem to be fewer and fewer new claims of "chemtrails" existing. I think there has been some change of emphasis to now claiming that geoengineering is taking place via spraying of something - but even that has died down somewhat for the same reasons IMO - unsupported claims that cannot be sustained in a free discussion of evidence.
Originally posted by IpsissimusMagus
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
As a result there seem to be fewer and fewer new claims of "chemtrails" existing. I think there has been some change of emphasis to now claiming that geoengineering is taking place via spraying of something - but even that has died down somewhat for the same reasons IMO - unsupported claims that cannot be sustained in a free discussion of evidence.
I disagree.
I think the reason there are fewer claims on ATS is because this site has a limited amount of members. Most of the evidence has already been presented and people are tired of circular arguments with the the team of debunkers.
Neither side has enough evidence at the moment the prove their case. You have not dis-proven anything.
However, all the evidence I have seen presented here, leads me to think that Geoengineering is taking place and that chemtrails are being used in those experiments.
I have seen a large increase of people talking about chemtrails on facebook lately.
The fact that less discussions are taking place here only reflects a very small percentage of people. The reason for it may vary and there are many factors. The least of them being that anyone has been convinced by debunkers.
Most of the evidence has already been presented and people are tired of circular arguments with the the team of debunkers.
Originally posted by Phage
The data was obtained by performing a search for "chemtrails". The sample consists of 136 threads, the first being started on July 30, 2002 and the most recent on November 25, 2008. Here is a chart of the results, the y axis is the number of threads started and the x axis is the month in which the threads were initiated.
Originally posted by MountainLaurel
To outright disreguard the mountains of evidence that geo-engineering is at the very "Least" being tested is foolish....you don't have the "big guns" involved with something that isn't true......I agree, well said IPM......there is reason for great concern over this......
If you are after the truth why wouldn't you do so instead of whining?
As pointed out, there were 136 threads with the word "chemtrail" in the title for that period of time. What, do you think I should have included threads with the word "Nibiru" in the title? I then simply plotted the months in which those threads were started.
He states that the data is based on 136 threads posted within a 6 year period.
And there is something wrong with that? The dataset I used supported my hypothesis. That's the way basis science works (though I never claimed my method was scientific). If you think there is something wrong with the method feel free to say why (specifically). You will see that there were several criticisms within that thread.
You had a hypothesis and set out to prove it.
I provided the source of the data. It was quite clearly stated.
Study conducted by you alone. Using data from where?
Go ahead and enjoy your fake charts. I'm not wasting my time.