Originally posted by LUXUS
reply to post by michaelbrux
Lets put it this way, there are gods, there are humans and there are demigods (god/human hybrids). All that royalty is or ever was is a group of
people who trace their genealogy back to a demigod. That is what it means to have "royal blood". The ancient Greeks and other cultures did not hide
this fact but today it is not common knowledge to most.
I am having difficulties understanding Michael. Many opinions with no back drop of reference materials to review and get a better understanding of.
And you are correct. Those Bloodlines all flow through Cain and his descendants. And despite the presumptions "some" have in respects to the Flood,
the Bible is clear, this bloodline survived and is actually ruling this world today, while the "people" just ignore or outright dismiss this
startling fact. One just needs to ask Prince Charles.
You also noted earlier,
I believe the flood was localised and not global.
This is quite accurate. Looking through the following, it is
clear, many peoples survived and left the lore or the occurrence for their offspring. Review of the Part II stories that are available for those just
willing to look at them. Atlantis, the Antediluvian World
carries quite a number of these
stories. Someone was left over besides Noah and those within the Ark.
*** Note. Many dismiss Ignatius's work, but the Lore spoken of in Part II is a collection of this period, from Peoples, and not Ignatius's stories
of that period. Disclaimer
There is also the glaring statement of Genesis 7 that describes the flooding of the "face" of the earth. Well a face is just part of the body, is it
You also noted Hercules ,
Genesis 6:4 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the
daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.
and those of his kind. Yes, these
are the Mighty Men, Men of renown. Today, they are our Heroes in Big Screen Movies, and Comic Periodicals, but they are still, the spawn of the
If this is so it would mean the whole of the bible story about the flood is actually an account of the destruction of Atlantis!
This has one area of concern for me. Although I would like to agree with you, the TIME FRAME is skewed. 9000, B.C. is a rough time line for the
destruction of Atlantis, according to Plato's story. Noah entered the Ark somewhere around 2200 B.C.. to give or take. My math makes that 7000 years
of difference in general terms.
But I believe they are related in some measure. I dismiss Plato's Accounting of the Disappearance of Atlantis, I do not buy it at all.
The "remains" amount to Muddy Waters and "SUGGEST" that Atlantis Sunk, all the while, there was no witness to such an event. I would believe a
more factual event is that Atlantis was REMOVED, because it was not of this earth in the first place. It was the abode of the Throne of GOD, and
eventually the realm of the Fallen, when they left their place of habitation. You REMOVE something "Like" Atlantis from a watery area, and you will
have, what Plato describes.
I am still trying to understand the Time Frame, and rectify that to my own satisfaction, but to date, I haven't the time to spend working on that.
Right now, I am doing "NOD" of all places.