It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
RNC Chair Reince Priebus:
What do Finnish cars, Mexican solar panels, and Danish windmills have in common? They were all funded by your tax dollars.
Thanks to President Obama, taxpayer money, mostly in the form of stimulus funds, ended up in the hands of companies overseas. Instead of creating jobs in America, the stimulus and other Obama policies created jobs or sent money to Finland, New Zealand, Indonesia, India, Mexico, Germany, Australia, Switzerland, China, Denmark, South Korea, the Dominican Republic, Thailand, Vietnam, Italy, Russia, Luxembourg, El Salvador, Great Britain, Spain, Japan, and France.
How did this happen? Consider the example of Fisker Automotive. The company received $500 million in loan guarantees from the U.S. government to produce electric cars. Then they took their money and decided to produce their $100,000 electric sports cars in Finland.
President Obama's policies may be spurring job creation in Scandinavia. But here at home, twenty-three million Americans are struggling for work. Millions of middle class families can barely make ends meet.
The billions of dollars that went overseas largely had to be borrowed. In other words, President Obama borrowed money from countries like China to send money to... countries like China. It's that kind of reckless spending that led President Obama to rack up $5.6 trillion in debt over the last three and a half years, bringing our total national debt to $15.8 trillion.
Priebus will officially unveil all of this later today in the swing state of Iowa, and a website called "Obamanomics Outsourced" goes into great detail showing how your tax dollars and mine benefitted and created jobs in over a dozen countries not named America.
Mitt Romney’s financial company, Bain Capital, invested in a series of firms that specialized in relocating jobs done by American workers to new facilities in low-wage countries like China and India.
During the nearly 15 years that Romney was actively involved in running Bain, a private equity firm that he founded, it owned companies that were pioneers in the practice of shipping work from the United States to overseas call centers and factories making computer components, according to filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Originally posted by spinalremain
Let's say that the above post is incorrect and that all the monies went abroad, like you're stating, OP.
I'm having trouble understanding how Obama is responsible for what corporations decide to do? Your article expicilty states that the corporations "decided to..............."
Your OP is insinuating that Obama loves the idea of corporations taking taxpayer dollars to build somewhere else.
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
Disclosure forms reveal that Democratic National Committee chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz, a member of Congress from Florida, previously held funds with investments in Swiss banks, foreign drug companies, and the state bank of India. This revelation comes mere days after the Democratic chair attacked presumptive Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney for holding money in Swiss bank accounts in the past.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by TinkerHaus
Then he is still rewarding companies which leave the US to avoid taxation and higher wages, and also providing funds to foreign corporations operating within the US. It's the same as providing welfare for illegals who sneak over the border in the end.
How about rewarding honest US based companies which hire US citizens by giving them incentives?????
Also, it's not free enterprise when the govt gives taxpayer dollars to foreign corporations operating within the US borders. Do the taxpayers get dividends for their investment?edit on 10-7-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)
or do you just choose arguments based on politics?
Originally posted by spinalremain
reply to post by xuenchen
What you're asking for is for the administration to be psychic.
All the homework in the world cannot predict what some douchebag CEO is going to decide to do with bail out money. They can have an agreement to do such and such, but sorporate lawyers are the best. They make the laws fit their agenda.
Obama has absolutely no control over that, whether yo want to believe that or not.
Originally posted by spinalremain
reply to post by xuenchen
All the homework in the world cannot predict what some douchebag CEO is going to decide to do with bail out money.
Originally posted by TinkerHaus
Originally posted by spinalremain
reply to post by xuenchen
What you're asking for is for the administration to be psychic.
All the homework in the world cannot predict what some douchebag CEO is going to decide to do with bail out money. They can have an agreement to do such and such, but sorporate lawyers are the best. They make the laws fit their agenda.
Obama has absolutely no control over that, whether yo want to believe that or not.
Exactly, versus Romney who intentionally outsourced labor for corporate profit.
Both of them are scumbags, hypocrites, tyrants, profiteers. I just think the partisan view on these topics is ridiculous.
Originally posted by spinalremain
reply to post by groingrinder
Im pretty sure there's a thread for that. Complete with Bush's bailouts along with Obama's
Originally posted by SM2
Originally posted by TinkerHaus
Originally posted by spinalremain
reply to post by xuenchen
What you're asking for is for the administration to be psychic.
All the homework in the world cannot predict what some douchebag CEO is going to decide to do with bail out money. They can have an agreement to do such and such, but sorporate lawyers are the best. They make the laws fit their agenda.
Obama has absolutely no control over that, whether yo want to believe that or not.
Exactly, versus Romney who intentionally outsourced labor for corporate profit.
Both of them are scumbags, hypocrites, tyrants, profiteers. I just think the partisan view on these topics is ridiculous.
Actually, Romney had ceased running Bain Capital when they decided to outsource some departments of companies, such as tech support and customer service. So, while you are crying foul about information you perceive to be false, do some research before you start spouting out Obama campaign talking points. Oh and news flash for some folks out there....Bush is not the president, Obama is and at some point he has to own his policy making decisions .