It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Russia today dispatched six warships to its naval base in Syria in a move that is likely to spark concern in the West.
A flotilla led by an anti-submarine destroyer have sailed from the Arctic port of Severomorsk to Tartus.
However, military sources claim the deployment is nothing to do with the growing tensions in the country where the crackdown by government troops against opposition forces has intensified in recent weeks
Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk...
Originally posted by mkgandhas
reply to post by Xcathdra
And neither will NATO risk a nuclear war over Assad .That should be clear.That is why VDV brigades are there.Plus there are Russian SSN's in mediterran sea carrying tactical nukes. Also some of VDV brigades have WMD .
Originally posted by Manhater
Would they make up their dang minds. First they send helios, then it gets stopped, then it goes back to Syria, then Russia stop selling weapons to Syria, and now they are sending Warships? Heck, this is worse then day of our lives.edit on 10-7-2012 by Manhater because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
I think this is all a puppet show to be honest
All members of the UN Security Council are all in cahoots with each other
Originally posted by Xcathdra
reply to post by rigel4
3 of the vessels are transports with Russian Marines. The lead warship is an antisubmarine destroyer and the vessels in tartous are joining the fllet after they sailing vessels refuel and ressuply. They are suppose to patrol the med until Spetember. The Marines are suppose to be used to secure Russian vessels / added security in Tartous.
This is nothing new and Russia discussed this option a few months back.
As for all out WMD comment from another poster - Please live in the now and understand the politics involved. The constant invocation of wmd use does nothing but support the position that you are lost when it comes to geopolitical issues and results from those actions.
Russia is not going to risk wwIII over Assad or for Ahmadenijad for that matter.
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
I think this is all a puppet show to be honest
All members of the UN Security Council are all in cahoots with each other
Originally posted by cerebralassassins
We could just as easily say would " Obama risk going to ww3 over Assad or Ahmadenijad".
Originally posted by cerebralassassins
I don't see how Russia defending its only naval base in the Med be anything other than defending its geopolitical interests.
Originally posted by cerebralassassins
If anyone is to attack that particular naval base then it is obvious that they are attacking first and not the other way around. therefore i would not blame the Russian federation in responding with whatever military response it see's as appropriate.
Originally posted by Ben81
No move from China yet ?
The easy fix for that would be for Turley to deny Russia access through the Bosphorus straights.