It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by paxnatus
I have a couple of questions for the ATS community:
Do you think doctors will be able to deliver adequate care to a patient based on time constraints, due to the overload of patients they will be expected to see?
Do you believe you will receive state of the art healthcare under Obama's govt. program?
Do you believe you will be in charge in deciding what procedures, test or surgeries you need or will that be mandated by the govt.?
Finally, do you believe you will receive the medication you may need for a particular illness?
edit on 7/10/2012 by paxnatus because: typo
Originally posted by xXxinfidelxXx
reply to post by LittleBlackEagle
The statistics prove you wrong at every turn. There's no need for me to post them here. They are readily available to the public and back my argument 100%. You are heavily misinformed.
Originally posted by yorkshirelad
Originally posted by paxnatus
I have a couple of questions for the ATS community:
Do you think doctors will be able to deliver adequate care to a patient based on time constraints, due to the overload of patients they will be expected to see?
Do you believe you will receive state of the art healthcare under Obama's govt. program?
Do you believe you will be in charge in deciding what procedures, test or surgeries you need or will that be mandated by the govt.?
Finally, do you believe you will receive the medication you may need for a particular illness?
edit on 7/10/2012 by paxnatus because: typo
I think the question should be :
Do you believe a person should be treated based on need or the size of their wallet?
The US system believes the wallet is the driver. All other western economies believe its is need. Every non hypocritical christian will agree with Jesus Christ ie need not money.
Originally posted by NavyDoc
Originally posted by yorkshirelad
Originally posted by paxnatus
I have a couple of questions for the ATS community:
Do you think doctors will be able to deliver adequate care to a patient based on time constraints, due to the overload of patients they will be expected to see?
Do you believe you will receive state of the art healthcare under Obama's govt. program?
Do you believe you will be in charge in deciding what procedures, test or surgeries you need or will that be mandated by the govt.?
Finally, do you believe you will receive the medication you may need for a particular illness?
edit on 7/10/2012 by paxnatus because: typo
I think the question should be :
Do you believe a person should be treated based on need or the size of their wallet?
The US system believes the wallet is the driver. All other western economies believe its is need. Every non hypocritical christian will agree with Jesus Christ ie need not money.
ANother question that is applicable is that should people be forced to provide for the needs of others? Christ talked a lot about individual charity but nowhere did he mention that the State should force charity on others either.
Regardless, we are supposed to have a secular government so WWJD should have nothing to do with the decisions of our elected representatives or a government officials.
Originally posted by NavyDoc
Originally posted by yorkshirelad
Originally posted by paxnatus
I have a couple of questions for the ATS community:
Do you think doctors will be able to deliver adequate care to a patient based on time constraints, due to the overload of patients they will be expected to see?
Do you believe you will receive state of the art healthcare under Obama's govt. program?
Do you believe you will be in charge in deciding what procedures, test or surgeries you need or will that be mandated by the govt.?
Finally, do you believe you will receive the medication you may need for a particular illness?
edit on 7/10/2012 by paxnatus because: typo
I think the question should be :
Do you believe a person should be treated based on need or the size of their wallet?
The US system believes the wallet is the driver. All other western economies believe its is need. Every non hypocritical christian will agree with Jesus Christ ie need not money.
ANother question that is applicable is that should people be forced to provide for the needs of others? Christ talked a lot about individual charity but nowhere did he mention that the State should force charity on others either.
Regardless, we are supposed to have a secular government so WWJD should have nothing to do with the decisions of our elected representatives or a government officials.
Originally posted by narwahl
Originally posted by NavyDoc
Originally posted by yorkshirelad
Originally posted by paxnatus
I have a couple of questions for the ATS community:
Do you think doctors will be able to deliver adequate care to a patient based on time constraints, due to the overload of patients they will be expected to see?
Do you believe you will receive state of the art healthcare under Obama's govt. program?
Do you believe you will be in charge in deciding what procedures, test or surgeries you need or will that be mandated by the govt.?
Finally, do you believe you will receive the medication you may need for a particular illness?
edit on 7/10/2012 by paxnatus because: typo
I think the question should be :
Do you believe a person should be treated based on need or the size of their wallet?
The US system believes the wallet is the driver. All other western economies believe its is need. Every non hypocritical christian will agree with Jesus Christ ie need not money.
ANother question that is applicable is that should people be forced to provide for the needs of others? Christ talked a lot about individual charity but nowhere did he mention that the State should force charity on others either.
Regardless, we are supposed to have a secular government so WWJD should have nothing to do with the decisions of our elected representatives or a government officials.
It is 2012. You own 6 factories.
It is 1917. Lenin and Trotzky finally manage to build a time machine. It travels to 2 places and times.
First they travel to 1945, Wolfsschanze, Berlin. Kill Hitler. It's 5 minutes before his suicide, so it doesn't really matter.
But hey. Build a time machine, kill hitler! Yay!
Next stop: One of your factories, 2012. Being paragons of communism they don't have a hard time to convince your workers that they should be the ones in control of the means of production! Trotzki institutes the death penalty to anybody not willing to defend the factory. Lenin meanwhile organizes the elections to the factory soviet.
Do you
a) Have to hire on your own dime people willing to reconquer the factory?
or
b) Have a right to request police to reinstitute your property rights, that you were unable to defend yoruself?
edit on 7/11/2012 by semperfortis because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by sirhumperdink
Originally posted by NavyDoc
Originally posted by yorkshirelad
Originally posted by paxnatus
I have a couple of questions for the ATS community:
Do you think doctors will be able to deliver adequate care to a patient based on time constraints, due to the overload of patients they will be expected to see?
Do you believe you will receive state of the art healthcare under Obama's govt. program?
Do you believe you will be in charge in deciding what procedures, test or surgeries you need or will that be mandated by the govt.?
Finally, do you believe you will receive the medication you may need for a particular illness?
edit on 7/10/2012 by paxnatus because: typo
I think the question should be :
Do you believe a person should be treated based on need or the size of their wallet?
The US system believes the wallet is the driver. All other western economies believe its is need. Every non hypocritical christian will agree with Jesus Christ ie need not money.
ANother question that is applicable is that should people be forced to provide for the needs of others? Christ talked a lot about individual charity but nowhere did he mention that the State should force charity on others either.
Regardless, we are supposed to have a secular government so WWJD should have nothing to do with the decisions of our elected representatives or a government officials.
if you live in a modern society where YOU benefit from the work of others through the use of roads, trash pick up, money spent on programs to help develop the technology you use everyday etc.
then yes you should be forced to provide for the needs of others
now if you want to go live in the woods living off the sweat of your brow only using things you produce yourself then no you shouldnt be forced to help anyone else
and you should have that option.
but if that option was available would you take it? (i really .....really doubt you would)
Originally posted by paxnatus
reply to post by paxnatus
Do you honestly believe doctors are going to treat patients for free.
Originally posted by PW229
Originally posted by paxnatus
reply to post by paxnatus
Do you honestly believe doctors are going to treat patients for free.
My grandfather was a Doctor and he would turn in his grave at your ignorance. Do not presume to tar the nature of the Doctor with your agenda.
Originally posted by NavyDoc
Originally posted by sirhumperdink
Originally posted by NavyDoc
Originally posted by yorkshirelad
Originally posted by paxnatus
I have a couple of questions for the ATS community:
Do you think doctors will be able to deliver adequate care to a patient based on time constraints, due to the overload of patients they will be expected to see?
Do you believe you will receive state of the art healthcare under Obama's govt. program?
Do you believe you will be in charge in deciding what procedures, test or surgeries you need or will that be mandated by the govt.?
Finally, do you believe you will receive the medication you may need for a particular illness?
edit on 7/10/2012 by paxnatus because: typo
I think the question should be :
Do you believe a person should be treated based on need or the size of their wallet?
The US system believes the wallet is the driver. All other western economies believe its is need. Every non hypocritical christian will agree with Jesus Christ ie need not money.
ANother question that is applicable is that should people be forced to provide for the needs of others? Christ talked a lot about individual charity but nowhere did he mention that the State should force charity on others either.
Regardless, we are supposed to have a secular government so WWJD should have nothing to do with the decisions of our elected representatives or a government officials.
if you live in a modern society where YOU benefit from the work of others through the use of roads, trash pick up, money spent on programs to help develop the technology you use everyday etc.
then yes you should be forced to provide for the needs of others
now if you want to go live in the woods living off the sweat of your brow only using things you produce yourself then no you shouldnt be forced to help anyone else
and you should have that option.
but if that option was available would you take it? (i really .....really doubt you would)
I live in a modern society where we all benefit from the effort and labors of others in an exchange of goods and services. How is having an equitable exchange of goods and services with another free individual comparable to forced provision of the needs of others? Here is an interesting thought: those productive people who are keeping up our modern society are not those people who are demanding that the state forces others to provide for their needs and, being productive people, would not need government intervention to have their basic needs met. That is the definition of a productive person.
Originally posted by PrinceDreamer
Originally posted by paxnatus
when I made the statement "doctors were not gonna go for this, they will quit", to another poster in another thread I was accused of believing just as Sarah Palin did in the "death panels".
Here you have the results of a nonpartisan and unbiased survey. 83% of the doctors in this country are considering another career!! Now, we will face a massive shortage.
....
I have a couple of questions for the ATS community:
Do you think doctors will be able to deliver adequate care to a patient based on time constraints, due to the overload of patients they will be expected to see?
Do you believe you will receive state of the art healthcare under Obama's govt. program?
Do you believe you will be in charge in deciding what procedures, test or surgeries you need or will that be mandated by the govt.?
Finally, do you believe you will receive the medication you may need for a particular illness?
Thanks as always for your time,
Pax
edit on 7/10/2012 by paxnatus because: typo
And you think this is a true reflection of the medical profession in America? You political bias is very evident here, and this is just a typical partisan scaremongering tactic.
Do you think doctors will be able to deliver adequate care to a patient based on time constraints, due to the overload of patients they will be expected to see?
They coped before Obamacare so why shouldn't they cope after it? I mean people who need medical attention seek medical attention so what's the difference? OH You mean the people who were completely unable to afford medical care before, who had to suffer continually because the medical profession priced them out of the market. Guess doctors are going to be forced to keep their Hippocratic Oath, damn they treat people ethically and honestly, real shame for the doctors that...
Do you believe you will receive state of the art healthcare under Obama's govt. program?
If your worried about your care, then get your own insurance, you are not force to only use Obamacare, you can supplement as well, at least everyone has access to some medical care and wont be turn away from hospitals because they didn't have the "right" insurance
Do you believe you will be in charge in deciding what procedures, test or surgeries you need or will that be mandated by the govt.?
I should imagine it is exactly like now, but governments making the decisions of cost value rather than insurance companies making cost decisions, read the small print on your insurance policy, see how much they can screw you over
Finally, do you believe you will receive the medication you may need for a particular illness?
I think pretty much most people will get their medication, the more experimental ones will be not supported and the overly costly, but then big pharma should not be charging so much, I mean it is all well and good blaming the government but lets face it is the corporate greed of big pharma and the medical companies that have driven America to this point, the exorbitant costs for even basic care is making the insurance companies mega rich is just pricing the bottom 50% out of any sort of medical care.
If there is going to be a huge shortage of doctors, then get on teh back of that other big corporate industry that is killing America, the education system. Make it affordable for people to train as doctors, hell there is enough unemployment I am sure many would like the opportunity for a decent career
Originally posted by NavyDoc
Originally posted by yorkshirelad
Originally posted by paxnatus
I have a couple of questions for the ATS community:
Do you think doctors will be able to deliver adequate care to a patient based on time constraints, due to the overload of patients they will be expected to see?
Do you believe you will receive state of the art healthcare under Obama's govt. program?
Do you believe you will be in charge in deciding what procedures, test or surgeries you need or will that be mandated by the govt.?
Finally, do you believe you will receive the medication you may need for a particular illness?
edit on 7/10/2012 by paxnatus because: typo
I think the question should be :
Do you believe a person should be treated based on need or the size of their wallet?
The US system believes the wallet is the driver. All other western economies believe its is need. Every non hypocritical christian will agree with Jesus Christ ie need not money.
ANother question that is applicable is that should people be forced to provide for the needs of others? Christ talked a lot about individual charity but nowhere did he mention that the State should force charity on others either.
Regardless, we are supposed to have a secular government so WWJD should have nothing to do with the decisions of our elected representatives or a government officials.