Obama is facing more and more criticism regarding his Iran policy. Here is an example-
He is being criticised for waiting, that Iran is getting closer and closer to getting a nuclear weapon and yet he waits, trying to solve the Iran
Here is Obama's view-
Obama is making it clear that he does not want to rush to a war that would be bad for the economy, that would cost American lives etc.
There is no doubt many are 'beating the drums of war' against Iran, so is Obama waiting for something to happen to 'justify' giving the green
light for military action (by Israel for example), or is he actually resisting the very powerful lobby that has incredible influence over American
policy and government?
Here is Israeli PM addressing the very influential AIPAC this year, banging the war drums, and yet Obama is waiting. The question is, is he resisting
'The cost of stopping Iran, I think it's time we addressed the danger of not stopping Iran.'
I would guess that answers will depend largely upon party affiliation. The "R" folks will say he is afraid, a weak leader and so on. The "D"
folks will say he is doing everything in his power to avoid war because he's just awesome like that.
I think he's waiting for the time when we can intervene without looking like we started it. Doesn't seem to matter who the president is, we are
always looking for some place to take democracy to
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.