Originally posted by canyouhandletruth
We dont come from Apes! Here is how to prove it
No i am not religious
apes are a degeneration from human DNA
Of course we don't. Only those who identify themselves with apes believe such lies - they have a dark mind, and they try desperately to spread the
darkness. They fail of course, because such darkness doesn't exist in the whole Universe that could distinquish the light of the smallest of
Microevolution is a fact. Macroevolution is a false theory based on wrong conclusions.
Here is what a researcher said about it (I am not sure about his name, but it sounds something like Loyd or Floyd Thyne or Payne or something):
"The problem with that theory is that there is no science that can verify it as actually being possible for that to occur. You would need for a first
living thing, millions, perhaps hundreds of thousands at a minimum, perhaps millions at a maximum, of lipids (?) to make a membrane to hold that
living thing. You would need sidoplasm or something to give it substance within it's body. You would need five to ten strands of DNA at a minimum to
do the housekeeping required, to take nourishment from the environment, and to put waste back out from the body when the nourishment had been turned
into energy. It would have to be able to reproduce itself ad infinitum. All of that has to happen AT ONCE. It can't happen piecemeal, it can't be
put together in parts.
So when you just look at the very beginnings of life, you see that Darwinism isn't possible. Furthermore, in the ongoing fossil record that we have
for subsequent formation of life and species, they never developed one from another. That's what Darwin postulated, that macroevolution would be
possible, that seaworms could turn into fish, fish could turn into amphibians, amphibians could turn into reptiles, reptiles could turn into mammals
and birds, that gills could turn into lungs, that fins could turn into limbs -- there is no evidence of ANY of that, and yet it is absolutely required
by Darwin's theory.
All that Darwin saw on the Galapacos was microeveolution, which is evolution in parts of bodies - and he just assumed, he just guessed, he projected,
that whole bodies could change, given enough time. It was logical - it is logical, it just simply is not born out by the facts. We've had a hundred
and forty years to look for those - that evidence - it's not there, it's not going to be there, that's not how life develops on Earth.
Life seems to be - if you read the fossil record fairly and truly - life seems to be brought here in great loads, in great amounts, it is as if the
Earth is being Terraformed by some superior entity or entities somewhere else - but there seems to be a conscious ongoing program of development of
life on Earth - but it is not being developed here, in and of itself, in the Terrestrial - strictly withing the Terrestrial bounds.
There is some kind of outside intervention occurring, whether that is interpreted as Extra-Terrestrial or Divine, it's up to the individual, but it
is not happening entirely here."
Take from it what you will, but to me, it has always been clear that darwin's theories are wrong, and evolution didn't happen the way we are taught
it had (.. if ONLY we could find the 'missing link' - too bad that it doesn't exist)