posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 06:23 PM
OK, again at 10 09. Stuart Rhodes? He says the nose and ears match. The nose is similar. But the ears are completely different. The one on the
right has long ears and the bottom lobe is completely different, the one on the left is short compact ears with more flaps of skin than inner showing
and a completely different lobe.
Not to mention weight, bone structure around the eye area. So is he going on surface similarities?
In some cases like his beginning evidence I would say, yeah that seems like a good match, but he's throwing in cases that don't match.
The police officer and his wife is a match. That is a good match. However you can't match the women precisely based on the sunglasses, its all in
the eyes there. And the teeth, the one woman has less than even looking teeth.
The kids, the boy and the girl. Neither the boy nor the girl is a match.
The girls are completely different. But the boys have a similarity but their teeth and eyebrows are completely different. Also their width of face,
jaw and very importantly EARS. They are not the same whatsoever.
So while I think its true they do this, not sure on his examples.
edit on 8-7-2012 by Unity_99 because: (no reason given)