It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by aBeneGesserit
reply to post by SWCCFAN
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." You see the commas they are independent clauses. The most important one is saved for last.
You are joking aren't you?
Here's me thinking that commas were punctuation, when in actual fact they denote independent clauses? No way! A comma denotes a pause in a sentence equivalent to taking a breath. If they were independent clauses they wouldn't be in the same sentence and those commas would be full-stops. If you can all twist your own constitution to fit your own ideas of 'rights' then no wonder you've got a load of twisters running the country.
Apart from that, here's a note from the same page of your constitution:
"4. In the Congressional Statutes at Large, Vol. 1, Page 97, the first and third commas are omitted, so that it reads:
"A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed."
"The question remains open of where those additional, and grammatically spurious, commas came from, but they do not change the legal meaning of the provision, and it would not be erroneous to omit them."
www.constitution.org...
So basically, whoever wrote the original just liked using commas and it still means that you have to be part of a well regulated militia, to have the right to bear arms.
I clicked on your link to the Militia Act 1903 but it wasn't that clear about the people as a militia so I looked up 'militia' and got this from Wiki:
"The reserve militia[3] or unorganized militia, also created by the Militia Act of 1903 which presently consist of every able-bodied man of at least 17 and under 45 years of age who are not members of the National Guard or Naval Militia. (that is, anyone who would be eligible for a draft)"
I understand what you meant now about the people being the militia but you would still be:
"subject to inspection by Regular Army officers, and had to meet certain standards."
So, even if you are separate from the National Guard, Reserve, and Land/Naval forces, the President would still be your Commander, so you would definitely be considered as committing treason.
If you formed your own militia, it wouldn't be "regulated" therefore it wouldn't be recognised by the US govt. and you would probably be treated in the same way as rioters would be. Or even worse, you'd end up in Guantanamo Bay.
If you all started a revolution over this issue and lost - the end result would be no gun ownership.
Which is apparently what they want anyway.
If you started the revolution and won - you'd end up keeping your gun ownership rights.
You'd all be cheering at your victory but nothing else will have changed. You'd be in the same position as before. Losing jobs, losing homes, watching the fat-cat bankers and financial parasites getting richer and richer- but that's ok because you've still got your guns.
Revolution is supposed to be for change - not to keep things as they are.
Originally posted by Americanist
reply to post by Golf66
How to respond... Even Crixus had a change of heart. We've been poisoned at the core.
Until something affected him personally he was not going to participate and was happy to die for his honor in the arena.
Originally posted by Americanist
And you missed my point. He was physically poisoned and left to die outside the arena... A play for the elitists. At the moment of clarity it occurred to him there was never any honor, period.
Originally posted by tangonine
Originally posted by Gwampo
I'm gonna go out and buy a gun with my next paycheck.
absolutely
And then conveniently lose it.
Originally posted by Gwampo
Originally posted by tangonine
Originally posted by Gwampo
I'm gonna go out and buy a gun with my next paycheck.
absolutely
And then conveniently lose it.
if I went out and got one that was "authorized" would they still try to take it?
Originally posted by METACOMET
Originally posted by Gwampo
Originally posted by tangonine
Originally posted by Gwampo
I'm gonna go out and buy a gun with my next paycheck.
absolutely
And then conveniently lose it.
if I went out and got one that was "authorized" would they still try to take it?
That might be asking the impossible. In just 19 months Americans purchased enough firearms to equip every single active duty soldier of the worlds top ten largest armys...and then some!
Recent statistics released by the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) report that for nineteen straight months, and that includes all of 2011, American men & women bought over 10,800,000 plus firearms. This number is based on the FBI National Instant Criminal Background Check System, better know as NICS. The final number of 10,800,000 is considered conservative by experts because this number does not account for the multiple purchase of guns at the same time or the guns bought and sold legally, person to person by US residents, which do not require a back ground check.
ACTIVE DUTY SOLDIERS OF THE WORLDS LARGEST MILITARIES
China 2,285,000
United States 1,468,000
India 1,325,000
North Korea 1,106,000
Russia Russian Federation 1,027,000
South Korea 687,000
Turkey 666,576
Pakistan 617,000
Iran 523,000
Egypt 468,500
Above Total = 10,173,076edit on 11-7-2012 by METACOMET because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Gwampo
Originally posted by tangonine
Originally posted by Gwampo
I'm gonna go out and buy a gun with my next paycheck.
absolutely
And then conveniently lose it.
if I went out and got one that was "authorized" would they still try to take it?
Originally posted by slapmyface
reply to post by links234
did you watch the whole thing?
Originally posted by links234
Originally posted by slapmyface
reply to post by links234
did you watch the whole thing?
No, you told me to start at 1:32...