It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Clinton Threatens Syria With a Catastrophic Assault, Claims Again that Syrian regime's 'days are n

page: 4
12
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 10:05 AM
link   
reply to post by Xcathdra
 


www.abovetopsecret.com...

clearly you made this statement,implicitly refering to me as if I am iranian .




posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 10:07 AM
link   

Originally posted by mkgandhas
Refute the facts?The syrian do not like muslim brotherhood and the West.They prefer Assad over them. But if better socialist alternative is given they will vote it over assad.Assad govt was corrupt and sheepishly obeyed the IMF reforms.

55% support Assad:

No really they dont. It easier to state they are afraid of assad since any disloyaltly results in death in that country, as we are seeing now.


Originally posted by mkgandhas
And General Wesley Clarke had stated in 2007 that Syria was targetted by USA for war and regime change.

www.youtube.com...

Your point? How long has IRans nuke program been going on? Thats right, it kicked back into high gear in 2003.



Originally posted by mkgandhas
So how can we trust american propaganda BS?

You dont seem to hvae a problem accepting the OP source, which is American. Does that mean when Western media prints something you dont agree with its propoganda and when they print something you do the source is valid and ok to use?

US media is not state controlled where as IUran and Syrias are so I wouldnt be so quick to launch into a tirade about US media and propoganda.


Originally posted by mkgandhas
reply to post by Xcathdra
 


www.abovetopsecret.com...

clearly you made this statement,implicitly refering to me as if I am iranian .

Your link goes to a post page. At no point have I stated or insinuated you are Iranian. You stated you werent and my reply to you was I could care less. You again felt the need to tell me you are from India, and again I could care less where you come from.
edit on 8-7-2012 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 10:07 AM
link   

Originally posted by mkgandhas
reply to post by Xcathdra
 


Refute the facts?The syrian do not like muslim brotherhood and the West.They prefer Assad over them. But if better socialist alternative is given they will vote it over assad.Assad govt was corrupt and sheepishly obeyed the IMF reforms.

55% support Assad:

www.gulf-times.com...

And General Wesley Clarke had stated in 2007 that Syria was targetted by USA for war and regime change.

www.youtube.com...

So how can we trust american propaganda BS?


Others who read the thread will come across our posts and some will decide to take the intiative and research and learn.


The Anglo-American empire is coming to an end and they know it.



posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 10:11 AM
link   

Originally posted by Xcathdra
How long has IRans nuke program been going on? Thats right, it kicked back into high gear in 2003.


Mind proving that? Oh I forgot it is simply another lie.



posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 10:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by ALF88

The Anglo-American empire is coming to an end and they know it.


Yet the Syrian and other Arab governments have been overthrown / actively being overthrown by their people. Iran is apparently intent on running the General George S. Custer defense.

Throw in a complete perversion of Islam to control the masses while oppressing women....

Yeah.. I dont think our days are number but you keep at it sparky.. You will eventually get one of your statements right.

With that, you kids have a good day.



posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 10:15 AM
link   

Originally posted by Xcathdra

Originally posted by mkgandhas
Refute the facts?The syrian do not like muslim brotherhood and the West.They prefer Assad over them. But if better socialist alternative is given they will vote it over assad.Assad govt was corrupt and sheepishly obeyed the IMF reforms.

55% support Assad:

No really they dont. It easier to state they are afraid of assad since any disloyaltly results in death in that country, as we are seeing now.


Originally posted by mkgandhas
And General Wesley Clarke had stated in 2007 that Syria was targetted by USA for war and regime change.

www.youtube.com...

Your point? How long has IRans nuke program been going on? Thats right, it kicked back into high gear in 2003.



Originally posted by mkgandhas
So how can we trust american propaganda BS?

You dont seem to hvae a problem accepting the OP source, which is American. Does that mean when Western media prints something you dont agree with its propoganda and when they print something you do the source is valid and ok to use?

US media is not state controlled where as IUran and Syrias are so I wouldnt be so quick to launch into a tirade about US media and propoganda.





No really they dont. It easier to state they are afraid of assad since any disloyaltly results in death in that country, as we are seeing now.


Lol,by who ?american sponsored al qaeda rebels? I suggest you talk to real syrians on facebook.I will give names
1)Es Al Assad
2)Cosnostra Jabbour
3)forex syria




These two are syrian friends and they would laugh at the BS you write.All have to say that they don't like Assad and regard him a weak leader but they dread muslim brotherhood,they prefer Dr. Qadri Jamil from the people's will party over Assad ,but muslim brotherhood no way.Also I have provided evidence that Assad is prefered over the islamic rebels or the muslim brotherhood terrorists




US media is not state controlled where as IUran and Syrias are so I wouldnt be so quick to launch into a tirade about US media and propoganda


US media is oiligarch controlled and USA is controlled by corporates,hence fascism and its much worse.
edit on 8-7-2012 by mkgandhas because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 10:23 AM
link   


Your point? How long has IRans nuke program been going on? Thats right, it kicked back into high gear in 2003.


Iran nuclear program cannot produce atomic bombs .for atom bomb 90% u-235 required. and Iran has bought tactical nukes from the black Market. Check General Yuri Balyuvkesy statement.

In explaining Russia's rationale, General Yuri Baluyevsky, the Russian Deputy Chief of Staff said at a press conference in June 2002, "Iran does have nuclear weapons. These are non-strategic nuclear weapons. I mean these are not ICBMs with a range of more than 5,500 kilometers... As for the danger of Iran's attack on the United States, the danger is zero." General Baluyevsky's extraordinary briefing implied that Iran had acquired its fissile material from another source so there was no reason for Russia not to complete the nuclear reactor at Bushehr.
edit on 8-7-2012 by mkgandhas because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 10:23 AM
link   

Originally posted by Xcathdra

Originally posted by ALF88

The Anglo-American empire is coming to an end and they know it.


Yet the Syrian and other Arab governments have been overthrown / actively being overthrown by their people. Iran is apparently intent on running the General George S. Custer defense.

Throw in a complete perversion of Islam to control the masses while oppressing women....

Yeah.. I dont think our days are number but you keep at it sparky.. You will eventually get one of your statements right.

With that, you kids have a good day.


Not that I am sad that you go, but before you do, what about my question, sweety?


Originally posted by ALF88

Originally posted by Xcathdra
How long has IRans nuke program been going on? Thats right, it kicked back into high gear in 2003.


Mind proving that? Oh I forgot it is simply another lie.


Must be a lie then. Thank you that is all the readers of this thread needed.

edit on 8-7-2012 by ALF88 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 10:32 AM
link   
yes I read the article on the teletext today about Mrs Clinton warning the Syrian government of the catastrophe, but this is the problem with America and Britain interfering with these Muslim nations, we don't understand them and to interfere we do it at our peril.
Reform of years of pain and losses in America and Britain have had in Afghanistan we will never win those people over even in the main city centre yesterday and woman was shot in the head and killed by terrorist groups that we cannot control, and no matter what amount of money given to the Afghanistan government it's all been taken on more weaponry in which particular troops rather than go to the people.
I really do believe that the only way that Britain and America will be made to keep their noses in their own troughs and businesses is that Russia China and Iran nuclear is a big kick, and from the way but I'm reading things and hearing things that time is approaching.
If Syria has indeed got chemical weapons, with Britain and America on the side of terrorists like Al Qaeda trying to attack Syria it may make desperate people use desperate measures, like your corner that the chances of it biting you are quite high.



posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 10:33 AM
link   
reply to post by mkgandhas
 


No body on this Earth will win a Nuclear War. I dont care how deep you dig or how high you fly. You wont make it. Mistake number one , thinking you can win in a Nuclear War.

When the first Nuke launches , hundreds will follow suite not just to that Nation that fired the Nuclear missile , but TO ALL nations who are considered hostile.

I dont think people understand what 500 25 - 100 megaton Nuclear Missiles will do to this planet. A single 100 Megaton Nuclear Missile would cause a Nuclear Winter. However , we expect some of these to be shot down. So you send many more than necessary.
edit on 8-7-2012 by milkyway12 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 10:35 AM
link   
reply to post by milkyway12
 


Population dispersal and civil defence can.Fukushima ,chernobyl are proof.and there are no 50 or 500 megaton bombs.Only hundreds of kilotons or a few megatons.



posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 10:37 AM
link   
reply to post by mkgandhas
 


50 Megaton bombs do exist. 100 Megaton Air Burst Nuclear Warheads do exist. I shouldnt say 100 Megatons , because it's not , however , the way it detonates is equivalent to a 100 Megaton Nuclear Warhead.

If i remember correctly , the way this is achieved is that is detonates several times over milliseconds , when you see one explosion , but there are actually 3 or 4 explosions. It feeds off it self and consumes the radiation used to pollute the Earth to Fuel the explosions. So now , you get a 2000 square KM death zone of heat , radiation , and blast spread.
edit on 8-7-2012 by milkyway12 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 10:41 AM
link   
reply to post by milkyway12
 


Evidence? are you refering to red mercury nukes? and air burst warheads are useless against underground installations.Ground burst is much more useful...
edit on 8-7-2012 by mkgandhas because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 10:45 AM
link   
reply to post by mkgandhas
 


Of course , it depends on the target. We wont only be killing everyone above the ground , but underground targets as well. There is a reason we have thousands of Nuclear Warheads with several Hundred ready to go at any moment.

I much rather Russia grow some balls and fight us with their military. However , if Nuclear war begins , its going to be because of Russia's weakness.

This is why we are sorrounding them with defense missiles , Russia cant win a War against NATO / US , so they will most likely launch Nukes.

--------------

However , our goal is not to wipe out the Human Population. So , if Nuclear war does happen. I wouldn't be surprised to see us Targeting only military installations and government buildings with smaller Megaton Warheads instead of blanketing the entire Nation.

Human Civilizations would most likely carry on , because hopefully Russia and we , the United States , are smart enough to target installations that only need to be taken out and not fall out shelters where civilians take cover.
edit on 8-7-2012 by milkyway12 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 11:03 AM
link   
reply to post by milkyway12
 


US strategy in cold war was to target civilian underground shelters in USSR as the military ones were too hardened and too deep during the cold war.and I am certain that US has no 100 mt warheads officially.Unless USA has access to grey aliens element 115 in mass quantities(bob lazar claimed that USA has it in small quantities) or has reverse engineered russian red mercury Ballotechnics ,I am doubtful.

Moscow has the largest number of civilian underground shelters more than 12000 and this is why NATO has aimed more than a 1000 thousand warheads on Moscow.

and i am doubtful that they are defense missiles(poland).I believe they are weapons of nuclear attack nature(IRBMs) to reduce strike time to 3 minutes and increase russian civilian deaths in event of war.

edit on 8-7-2012 by mkgandhas because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 11:06 AM
link   
reply to post by mkgandhas
 


And this is why every one loses.


By the way , there is never any structure to hardened.

The best defense in regards to Nukes , is secrecy.

-------------

Such as Area 51 ... if every one knows about Area 51 , do you think they are still testing black of the black projects at Area 51?

edit on 8-7-2012 by milkyway12 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 11:57 AM
link   
Keep voting for democrats or republicans and world war three will eventually happen.

Keep voting for democrats or republicans and everyone will be poor in a 100% privatised economy.

I find it troubling how some posters shift their opinions on current events faster than the lunar tides do on a daily basis. They crucify obama on meaningless stuff and stick WITH him in relation to corporate global imperialism.

When people say "it does not matter if you vote left or right" they mean democrats and republicans. As though the other 50 parties exist only in science fiction. The hypocrisy of the media and the trolls on ATS has punched a hole through the roof lately.

The best part of all is conservatives like Xcathdra(or whatever the hell HER name is) used to hate the muslim brotherhood and fear it. NOW SHE LOVES IT! lol, you are SOOO pathetic!



posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 12:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by PLASIFISK

Originally posted by mkgandhas
reply to post by PLASIFISK
 


I am not muslim either.Al qaeda is a CIA outfit. So muslim terrorists blow themselves for CIA.



And with that said you have just confirmed you are a retard.

Good day, terrorist.


Wow. That would be offensive even if you were correct, which you are not!

How old are you? Maybe 13? Learn some manners.

edit on 8/7/12 by EarthCitizen07 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 12:57 PM
link   
I want to see Russia, China, Iran make a massive attack on America, then Clinton would know what it's like saying stupid things like she says.



posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 01:06 PM
link   
reply to post by mkgandhas
 
Had to hop in her amidst all the bickering heated discussion to say thanks for sharing that video of Gen. Clark in 2007. That was incredibly enlightening, how I've never seen that before is a mystery to me...

Must learn more! Crazy to watch it coming true.
edit on 8-7-2012 by Sek82 because: manners correction. ;-P



new topics

top topics



 
12
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join