posted on Jul, 6 2012 @ 09:31 AM
The Ancient people had great knowledge. Well, they may not have exactly been people, possibly a little different humanoid being. At the time the
pyramids were built there were quite a few of them. I think they were built way before they say they were. Something happened to them and their
populations dwindled. They were what we considered gods. We are crossbred with them because we could, our exact race isn't that old.
What happened with evidence of these beings. I think they were concentrated on a large Island that blew up. They had missionaries all over the
world. These beings with elongated heads and a bigger body than ours, Giants, were extremely intelligent. What we looked like before the blending is
questionable and how smart we were is also questionable. It's easy to see many variations of beings just by looking at different humans. Maybe
humans were the monkey men at that time which may be something like pure Chinese of which very few exist.
Some of us are genetically cut with Neanderthal (European), others with Cro-magnum (Asian) and all races may be somewhat cut with these elongated
skull people. I've read much evidence but sometimes there are major conflicts with Paleontologists, Religions, and Genetic Researchers. I put more
faith in Genetic Researchers than Paleontologists and Archeologists because the DNA evidence is more reliable. Even then this Genetic science is in
it's infantile state but will evolve soon to show us the truth. I study the research and not the interpretations of the research. I find that those
who are interpreting it have monitary interests for their science incorporated into their interpretations.
I'm going to watch all these videos as time becomes available. This will lead me to much research to verify their stories. I always find interesting
stuff with this verification process, sometimes what I find invalidates much of the interpretations. I have studied many things known to us as facts
by science only to find flaws in the interpretations by highly praised officials of the sciences. I suppose that hideous Occam Razor caused the
results to be half truths. Then other conclusions in science are made off these half truths. This makes most evidence distorted in our scientific
societies unless you go back to the research papers.
Good thread but the movies and research will tie me up for a week. When I'm interested it is fun and I have a lot of interest in these things. Many
of the interpretations of these things where monitary gain for the science is removed is more accurate than the sciences themselves. It would be
speculation if I didn't research all of the articles content though. Desire for recognition and haste-fully filling a video with someone else's input
also causes problems though. Even if I find some of it is fiction I do not automatically discount the whole thing. There is always fiction in things
to make them sound more interesting.
I'm a diffusionist and have been studying this stuff for about four years on and off. It'll be interesting. I think I watched one or two of these
edit on 6-7-2012 by rickymouse because: (no reason given)