It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Maslo
reply to post by zeta55
By blowing up the baloon, with the galaxies drawn on the surface, yes all the galaxies are moving away from each other. I still conclude there is a central point.
Where on the surface of the baloon is the central point located then?
But, in the case of the universe, there is no hole through which air is being blown to inflate it.
What's being driven into a higher energy state by this dark energy? What is being excited so as to exert this pressure?
The space itself. Thats why its called the metric expansion of space.
Which means that you can't change space arbitrarily. It's akin to changing the size of the squares on a chess board - it does nothing to change the game, since the game deals in squares as the only metric.
No, there doesn't have to be. The pressure is exerted by the vacuum of space. The pressure causing the expansion exists within the surface of the sphere.
I think its more like adding more squares than changing their size (if we mean Planck volumes of space by squares).
Originally posted by Aim64C
You're talking in circles, here.
What sphere?
Perhaps more importantly - how does the vacuum of space exert pressure?
I'm not asking for your condescending, grade-school level answers to this stuff. I'm asking for a real theory - a real model.
Originally posted by Aim64C
You're talking in circles, here.
What sphere?
Perhaps more importantly - how does the vacuum of space exert pressure?
I'm not asking for your condescending, grade-school level answers to this stuff. I'm asking for a real theory - a real model.
Originally posted by Aim64C
What else could red-shift all those galaxies besides the Doppler effect?
Logically, this does not have to be answered. Experiments would have to verify red shift of light to be a reliable indication of velocity and distance at scale. Obviously - this is very difficult to do with our engineering and technological capabilities. Which is why I find it difficult to respect any individual who claims to be capable of knowing much about the cosmos - much less when they claim to know its origins or ultimate fate.
Originally posted by Aim64C
Then why tout the theory about as if it were fact?
Originally posted by Aim64C
Where's the evidence for dark matter? Dark energy? ...
Physicists can't even BEGIN to show you mathematical calculations showing how space would metrically expand (nothing that fits in with experimentally validated models of physics, at least).
Originally posted by frugal
I am still going with the lava lamp idea: Aren't the Milky Way Galaxy and the Andromeda Galaxy predicted to collide to gether during the next Two Billion years? This was in the internet news a month ago. Doesn't this rule out some of the expansion theory of everything moving apart? Clearly these galaxies are going to smash into one another. One galaxy is obviously moving faster than the other...or the gravity is pulling one galaxy in.
Adding more Planck volumes between objects doesn't exactly ring as any more plausible as conservation of energy would create multiple situations in which this volumetric expansion would have to be accompanied by changes of energy states that would trigger release of energy quanta and result in detectable phenomena.
Originally posted by wirehead
Originally posted by Aim64C
I'm not asking for your condescending, grade-school level answers to this stuff. I'm asking for a real theory - a real model.
Okay. We can write the metric of space as ds^2 = -c^2 dt + a(t)^2 * (dr^2 + S(r)^2 do^2)
where a(t) is a variable scale factor, S is a curve parameterization (0 for flat space, +1 for positive curvature, -1 for negative curvature, depending on your model.)
dt, dr and do are the differentials of time, distance and angular size, respectively, which contribute to the distance measure ds.
From this you can see that the spatial geodesic will scale with a(t). Now, we use Einstein's field equations to find the dynamics of this metric for different arrangements of matter and energy (different stress-energy tensors.) You find that matter will tend to contract the metric, which can either have started with a sufficient "escape velocity" to expand forever, or reach a standstill, or contract, depending.
You can write down equations describing the dynamics of the scale factor accordingly. By solving these equations, you'll then have your description of how space expands or contracts depending on the density and equation of state of the fields which inhabit the space. Then you can play around adding/subtracting matter, radiation, and a cosmological constant, and see how the universe behaves.