Google Gets Dystopian: "Google Glasses" and the Surveillance State, page


Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times
Topic started on 5-7-2012 @ 02:31 PM by Anonymous404

Google Gets Dystopian: "Google Glasses" and the Surveillance State


www.alternet.org
In April, when word of Google Glass emerged (before the demo showed us exactly how easy, effective and hi-fi using the accessory actually could be), an ominous thread began on the official forum of the International Private Investigators Union. “Undercover Surveillance Just Got Easier,” it declared, “with the New Google Glasses.”
(visit the link for the full news article)


Related News Links:
www.mediabistro.com
www.extremetech.com
www.forbes.com
www.fastcodesign.com


reply posted on 5-7-2012 @ 02:31 PM by Anonymous404
With our government edging closer to watching our every move, do we really want everyone on the internet to be able to as well?

The article claims it could be easier to report crimes, but it will also make you easier to triangulate.

Remember a few months ago when the NSA said it was already buddying up to Google to get information on our search histories(
legaltimes.typepad.com...)? Well something tells me it's not going to slow down once they get a hold of our whereabouts, what we're seeing, and hearing.

This seems like a pretty cool invention, but do we really want to be tracked and recording everything we see?

I won't be purchasing a pair, at least not until I learn to hack the heck out of it and turn off some functions.

www.alternet.org
(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 5-7-2012 @ 02:48 PM by seeker1963
reply to post by Anonymous404



I read an article two days ago about this. Google seems to be really upset because someone in the porn industry said that they can't wait to try the glasses out in making POV porn!


reply posted on 5-7-2012 @ 03:07 PM by Mapkar
reply to post by CoolerAbdullah786



Not only that, but I'm curious as to how the wireless radio will function in these little doodads. If it's as internet intensive as it appears to be, I'm curious as to how the RF exposure will affect neural activity and such. Even low power exposure could pose a hazard overtime. It brings into question what the maximum permissible exposure limits are for the frequency they use, and how they handle them.


reply posted on 5-7-2012 @ 06:58 PM by MrSandman
Originally posted by Mapkar
reply to
post by CoolerAbdullah786



Not only that, but I'm curious as to how the wireless radio will function in these little doodads. If it's as internet intensive as it appears to be, I'm curious as to how the RF exposure will affect neural activity and such. Even low power exposure could pose a hazard overtime. It brings into question what the maximum permissible exposure limits are for the frequency they use, and how they handle them.


You make a good point. I wonder if we are already getting too much exposure with all the cell phones, towers wifi etc.


reply posted on 6-7-2012 @ 12:25 AM by Wertdagf
reply to post by Anonymous404



yep your just so awesome and interesting...

i cant wait to watch you all the time... /laugh
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Israel angered over IAEA vote on nuclear arsenal
  Posted 13 days ago with 79 member flags
Neil Armstrong dead at age 82 - report
  Posted 17 days ago with 63 member flags
Judge orders release of detained Marine veteran
  Posted 19 days ago with 58 member flags
Birds hold \'funerals\' for dead
  Posted 10 days ago with 55 member flags
TSA agents swarm Ron Paul\'s plane, demand explosives check
  Posted 11 days ago with 47 member flags
Mysterious Changes in Ocean Salt Spur NASA Expedition
  Posted 1 days ago with 36 member flags
Ga. Murder Case Uncovers Terror Plot by Soldiers
  Posted 15 days ago with 32 member flags