posted on Feb, 7 2013 @ 08:13 PM
I know that some people cannot accept this fact, but these animals really do exist. I promise, lol. Those of us lucky enough to have had a sighting
keep saying this, but I can understand that it is hard for some people to take on faith, although it is quite annoying sometimes. Some people have
sightings, but they still cannot accept what they saw. Some people have a "maybe" sighting, but many sightings are unmistakable, and leave no
question as to whether these animals exist. And in my opinion, there are many more of them than even most believers think there are.
I also believe that their population is growing to the point that sightings are going to increase as time goes on. Anyway, what really bothers me is
that there are people who say these animals do not exist. Why in the world would someone believe them, when they have seen nothing. I say they are
real because I've seen them, while someone else says they are not real because they haven't seen them. See how dumb that sounds? One cannot say
something does not exist because they have never seen it.
And once one really delves into the sighting reports, data, and physical evidence that is available, and I mean seriously studies it and looks for
whatever may be there, they will soon realize that they likelihood of these animals not existing is quite low. In fact, statistically speaking, it
would make more sense for these animals to exist than for all of the sighting reports and other evidence to be false at this point. Only a fraction of
reports make it to a research organization, and into a database, yet there are still thousands of reports that have been documented over the last few
A big part of the problem is that most people do not approach the subject from a serious point of view, and they are biased from the start. There has
been virtually no scientific mission undertaken to attempt to document these animals, and every single mission that has been undertaken is likely
doomed to failure, until a new approach is taken. This is not surprising once one learns, from available data, the nature of these animals. There is
just too much info to explain in one post, but a brief rundown on why these animals have not been documented scientifically is presented below.
These animals have exceptional awareness, on average, especially compared with other animals. They obviously have reasoning capacities, which gives
them an edge over all animals except humans. But in their environment they are superior to humans, as that is all they have had to put their reasoning
abilities toward. People complain about blurry pictures and videos, yet that too makes sense once one understands the situation. Most people out in
the woods who have sightings are not looking for bigfoot. If they have a camera, it is not likely to be a camera that is designed to film at any sort
of range. And coupled with the fact that a sasquatch is going to know the person is there long before the person knows the sasquatch is there, at
least the majority of the time, it stands to reason that hardly anyone will be in a position to capture good evidence.
Sasquatch seem to have hearing that is at least equal to that of humans, if not superior, as well as good eyesight, even in the dark. Especially in
the dark, considering they are relatively nocturnal. What they do have that is superior to humans is their sense of smell. Besides hearing someone
coming, this is their best tool as far as awareness is concerned. This is one of the factors that allows them to avoid camera traps so easily. They
simply associate anything that does not belong in their environment with humans. They either see, smell, or even hear the internal mechanisms of these
cameras, and are skittish towards them. The cases where camera trap evidence seems to be authentic virtually all share the characteristic of something
approaching from behind and attempting to move the camera trap around, presumably attempting to sort of pull it off the tree or just inspect it. I
think that one case had images that even showed the animal attempting to lick the camera.
There are many areas of sasquatch behavior that I could go into, but as I said, I just do not have the space here. And there really is good physical
evidence that has been gathered, people are just not aware of it. And if science is ever going to document this animal, which cannot be done simply by
someone taking video of the animals, there must be a change of approach. Any scientists who attempt to document sasquatch start off handicapped,
because they are assuming that sasquatch is like any other animal. Big mistake, because the methods used to document other animals cannot be used to
document sasquatch, as they are simply more intelligent than all other animals. The fact that we are even having this discussion is testament to their
woodcraft abilities and intelligence, since they have yet to be documented. Anyone who says these things are myth is just wrong.