It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
This thread should draw the ire of quite a few OSers in short order. Reading sites across the net, Harrit is derided in the fashion typical of OSers here. I'd expect the same. 3,2,1.................
Originally posted by ahamarlin
Lilou Macé interviews Dr. Niels Harrit, Associate Professor Emeritus of Chemistry at the University of Copenhagen Denmark, Friday 29th of June 2012.
A scientist tells about his research of 911 and a reporter who let him talk. Very nice video: educate yourself!
youtu.be...
Source: Lilou Mace
Originally posted by psikeyhackr
Skyscrapers are not rocket science.
He says a TV journalist would not understand elemental physics. That is the travesty. Grade school kids should understand this trivia.
psik
Originally posted by GenRadek
Originally posted by psikeyhackr
Skyscrapers are not rocket science.
The comment of the month right here. well hell, then if that is the case, why cant anyone just go out and build a skyscraper? If it is just gradeschool physics, I'm surprised why people even bother going to grad school and PhDs in engineering to build skyscrapers.
Originally posted by exponent
reply to post by psikeyhackr
The irony is thick enough to chew.
Originally posted by -PLB-
reply to post by psikeyhackr
Lets see, you have no theory, you have no evidence, you don't have a model. Somehow, without any of that, you still just know that every expert is wrong and you are right. And you keep wondering why almost nobody takes you, or Harrit for that matter, seriously.
Did you ever consider that with absence of all the above, there is a very significant possibility that you are wrong? Or is that possibility not a part of your thinking process?
Originally posted by -PLB-
reply to post by psikeyhackr
Not understanding some (basic) concepts is not a theory. Why do you think that instead of you missing the required insight, almost the whole (academic) world is wrong? What makes you so special that you know better? These are the signs of lunacy.
Originally posted by Six Sigma
Does anyone know if Dr. Niels Harrit has commented on the paper that refuted his Thermite dust paper?
Originally posted by psikeyhackr
You mean like your elegant code coming up with pretty much that same answer as my code which you say is so crappy and that I admitted years ago was a kludge?
More psychological BS diverting things to ego games but I don't see any physical models from anybody that can completely collapse. Why don't you build an "elegant" model that can do it? Are you saying my ego can affect the behavoir of a physical model that anyone can duplicate anywhere for themselves?
What impressed me so much about what Harrit said was the significance of 9/11 to Western Civilization now. How do we run a technological society when so many people can't figure out such a simple lie and so many experts including "educators" must be at least refusing to talk about it?
...
If most people conclude airliners could not do it then what does that say about all of the "white papers" and "peer reviews". Organized lying?
psik
Originally posted by exponent
Originally posted by psikeyhackr
You mean like your elegant code coming up with pretty much that same answer as my code which you say is so crappy and that I admitted years ago was a kludge?
Do you want a biscuit because you didn't screw it up too badly? Your code was unreadable, your method flawed and inaccurate, accept it.
SORRY! It is just the results that matter to me.
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by psikeyhackr
SORRY! It is just the results that matter to me.
Thats your problem in one sentence. All you care about is achieving a result that confirms your bias. Not the integrity of the investigation.
Originally posted by exponent
No psikey. The whole world is not organised in one large conspiracy against you.