It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
LIMA — Archeologists in Peru have discovered a sundial, an underground tunnel and a reception room in a complex dating back to the Wari civilization, El Comercio newspaper reported Sunday.
One of the relics is believed to be a precursor to an Incan sundial, while 18 niches painted in white on the walls may have held ancestral mummies, Joseph Ochatoma, leading the excavation, told the newspaper.
Ochatoma added that the reception room is shaped like the letter "D" and is surrounded by platforms.
The discovery was made several months ago but only disclosed recently.
The complex, situated in the the Andean region of Ayacucho was discovered in 1931. The first excavations there began in 1942 but were cut short due to budget shortfalls.
I think of all the Ancient Cultures and Civilizations of the Americas the two that impress me the most are the Inca's of Peru and the Olmec of Mexico.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
reply to post by Hanslune
No offense Hans but you kind of butchered what I wrote there.
I qualified what you quoted me with the following...
I think of all the Ancient Cultures and Civilizations of the Americas the two that impress me the most are the Inca's of Peru and the Olmec of Mexico.
Seems a bit out of context.
Originally posted by Hanslune
redacted! Sorry Slayer misread that
Originally posted by Hanslune
Now the Olmecs are another case. For them I have to ask, where did they state that?
Originally posted by SLAYER69
I did not misread that. You gave an opinion on something you quoted out of context just like you're doing again here...
They both have mysterious ruins that are credited to them yet, they both talk about a "previous time" when others created certain locations which they themselves came upon in their earliest history
Originally posted by SLAYER69
reply to post by Hanslune
I don't know who starred your reply and why [Obviously an overzealous fan] because that's a piss poor recovery attempt. You know what you wrote and then edited it out after I called you on it.
I was referring to the Incas when they were asked by the Spanish about places such as Tiahuanaco & Puma Punku etc. While the Olmec are often given credit for locations that are unlike other Olmec sites and not like anything they are known to have created.
Is there anything on this thread's topic you'd like to contribute or are you going to play that tired old game of dissecting misquotes and or taking things out of context while attempting to portray yourself as being more knowledgeable?
Originally posted by Hanslune
So what do you think the Inca's meant when they told the Spanish that? Something other than known cultures made x and y?edit on 3/7/12 by Hanslune because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Hanslune
Now the Olmecs are another case. For them I have to ask, where did they state that? There were pre-Olmec societies and cultures in the area where the Olmec homeland is -but not granted the title civilizations by archaeologists
Link
The Olmecs existed as a fully-fledged civilisation in Mesoamerica from approx' 1,600 BC - 400 BC, with evidence of 'pre-Olmec' activity in the region since 2,500 BC, but it wasn't until around 1,500 BC that they became the dominant power in Mesoamerica.
Originally posted by Stonesplitter
Originally posted by Hanslune
Now the Olmecs are another case. For them I have to ask, where did they state that? There were pre-Olmec societies and cultures in the area where the Olmec homeland is -but not granted the title civilizations by archaeologists
Link
The Olmecs existed as a fully-fledged civilisation in Mesoamerica from approx' 1,600 BC - 400 BC, with evidence of 'pre-Olmec' activity in the region since 2,500 BC, but it wasn't until around 1,500 BC that they became the dominant power in Mesoamerica.
Not really sure what you're asking as you seem a bit vague, but........yeah, they were a civilization.
They both have mysterious ruins that are credited to them yet, they both talk about a "previous time" when others created certain locations which they themselves came upon in their earliest history
Originally posted by SLAYER69
reply to post by Hanslune
I don't know who starred your reply and why [Obviously an overzealous fan] because that's a piss poor recovery attempt. You know what you wrote and then edited it out after I called you on it.
I was referring to the Incas when they were asked by the Spanish about places such as Tiahuanaco & Puma Punku etc. While the Olmec are often given credit for locations that are unlike other Olmec sites and not like anything they are known to have created.
Is there anything on this thread's topic you'd like to contribute or are you going to play that tired old game of dissecting misquotes and or taking things out of context while attempting to portray yourself as being more knowledgeable?
That game gets pretty old...