It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mbkennel
Remember, the '1 in X million' chance refers to statistical fluctuations assuming each group's assumed model for background. There is always systematic error (i.e. somebody making a mistake or inaccuracies in the model) so you shouldn't take the interpretation of X sigma too seriously.
Yes, they haven't verified all the properties, but it really looks like a real Higgs more than anything else.
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
I am aware, I think the data is much more supportive than 5 sigma, but I am going with worse possible scenario in which each set of data must stand on its own. I have yet to see a statistiscal analysis done combining the two independent teams, so I only want to go with what is known, not probable.
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
Secondly...there are MANY forms of IQ...
As for my statements on whether this is the Higgs-Boson...I have a very confident feeling it will prove not to be or at the very least...not what they think it is.
Originally posted by Moduli
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
I am aware, I think the data is much more supportive than 5 sigma, but I am going with worse possible scenario in which each set of data must stand on its own. I have yet to see a statistiscal analysis done combining the two independent teams, so I only want to go with what is known, not probable.
You don't just get to randomly decide to ignore data. You're required to combine them, it doesn't make sense not to once you have both sets of data. The reason you haven't seen the combined quote in the media is because the media doesn't know this, and the scientists think it's so obvious they did not bother to add the two numbers together for anyone else because that's trivial arithmetic .
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by Moduli
ALRIGHT! Someone here GET'S IT! THEY HAVE NOT A CLUE WHICH ONE!
Split Infinity
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by Moduli
ALRIGHT! Someone here GET'S IT! THEY HAVE NOT A CLUE WHICH ONE!
Split Infinity
The guy you said gets it disagrees with you. You claim it is NOT the Higgs, it is. The only question is whether it fits nice and neat into the theories or if it has unforseen properties that will bring new questions. Either way you are wrong, it acts the way the Higgs is predicted to act. For someone with a 172 IQ you just don't get it. Then again, you know what they say about tough guys? It can be translated into smart guys too.
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
reply to post by SplitInfinity
Now that I can see, and brings us back to the "why"? Why is there mass? Is the photon itself being attached with mass through some process, or is there an effect taking place that is creating mass while the photon itself is massless still?
I guess we shall see! All secrets find the light of day eventually. Well, almost all.