It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"We're dealing here with members of a secret society who presumably prefer each other in terms of advancing each other, recommending each other, appointing each other to public positions and enhancing each other's business deals," Nader said.
When it comes to election campaigns and elected offices, principles of openness are supposed to operate in a democratic society. A secret society of powerful personages running for office or holding office raises several important questions:
1. How inclusive is this oath of secrecy?
2. Does this oath extend to member�s political and business careers?
3. What are the sanctions for breeching the secrecy? Do they extend to members political and business responsibilities?
4. Are Bonesmen expected to preferentially advance or select people for responsible positions who are Skull and Bones Patriarchs rather than base their choices on the merits of the various applicants for positions?
5. What general subject matters and roles of Bonesmen are outside the oath of secrecy or code of silence?
6. How do Bonesmen rank the oath to Skull and Bones when they have to take oaths to public office?
7. When oaths conflict, which takes precedence? Which takes their allegiance?
These are questions that cannot be cavalierly dismissed by Mr. Bush and Mr. Kerry; if they cannot or will not answer them they should resign their membership in Skull and Bones publicly and immediately.
Originally posted by NuTroll
a prez does not have the same rights to privacy as the other citizens in some manners. this is one of them. they are not asking for info on the group itself persay as much as its influence on him as a individual.
Originally posted by 7th_Chakra
The president doesn't do his job anyway!!!
This administration the 'Presient' consists of about 10 people!
Originally posted by 7th_Chakra
Theron, I notice Naders character is being shot at, I find it hard to believe EVERYONE with something unfavourable to say about a secret group is a 'broken, poor, crazy, jelous, hateful' person.
He might be right, he might be wrong. Why are you 'trying' to break his character as you did mine regarding 'CHIP'????
I notice the character is something you seem to enjoy attacking. Why?
Originally posted by Jamuhn
I don't see how it's a bad thing to ask a politician whether he values his allegiance to America more than to the Skull and Bones society. It is easy for them to say no, but that's more of answer than we've had on this issue.
Originally posted by theron dunn
But in a free society, it must be PROVEN that what he is doing is contrary to law and ethics. If you demanded information from me that I felt you had no right to, I would not answer, and I would not expect Bush to answer Nader at all... the best I would give Nader is a cold stare, and that only long enough to move on...
Nader is a naddering nabob of negativity, and will try/do anything to get SOMEONE, SOMEWHERE to pay attention to him... and I certainly will not waste time on his publicity stunts... you seem an intelligent man, why are YOU wasting time with him?