It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
HARLEM — The NYPD has created a "wanted" poster for a Harlem couple who film cops conducting stop-and-frisks and post the videos on YouTube — branding them "professional agitators" who portray cops in a bad light and listing their home address, DNAinfo.com New York has learned.
Be aware that above subjects are known professional agitators," read the flyer, which bears the NYPD shield and a seal of the NYPD's Intelligence Division. It also gave the home address of the couple. "Above subjects MO is that they video tape officers performing routine stops and post on YouTube," the sign said. "Subjects purpose is to portray officers in a negative way and too deter officers from conducting there [sic] responsibilities
Someone is going to look at that and see my face on what looks like a wanted poster," said Gonzalez. "Anyone who doesn't know about our videos and know us will look at those mugshots, read about us being so-called agitators who interfere with police activity, and see criminals."
So much for community activism. If they can't arrest you for filming them, they are now publicly harrasing you.
But Gonzalez and Swaye see the flyer as an effort to "discredit" and "shame" them for protesting what they feel is a civil rights issue, while also potentially endangering them by putting their home address on the flyer.
Warning Don't film the police.
professional agitators
ColoradoJensedit on 2-7-2012 by ColoradoJens because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Ex_CT2
'...branding them "professional agitators" who portray cops in a bad light...'
If the cops are only doing their jobs in a lighthanded and professional manner, which is apparently what they'd have us believe, how would it be possible to portray them in a bad light? Are we to believe that they're editing the videos in a manner to make the cops look bad? If that's what they're doing, then I can't blame the cops; on the other hand, why would I believe that?
Why is it that I think it's the cops themselves who are portraying cops in a bad light?
Originally posted by Ex_CT2
reply to post by ColoradoJens
Accountability. Couldn't have said it better. There's a trend toward militarization of police forces since 9/11. Their hiring and training practices are changing. They're insisting upon instant obedience, and going to their tazers more and more often. The last thing they want is accountability.
And now stooping to this: Demonizing critics and publishing home addresses. And you have to ask yourself why? So that if a call comes in from that address--if the citizens at that address are under threat or in trouble--there's no particular hurry to get there? Makes you wonder....
Originally posted by ColoradoJens
reply to post by phroziac
It seems as if it is such a big issue for the cops...why are they so scared if what they are doing is legal? Is it really in their best interest to be posting people's addresses whom they disagree with? And it appears now if you are an activist in any fashion you are labled an "agitator". Sad, really.
CJ
Originally posted by ColoradoJens
reply to post by phroziac
Yep, you are right - and I always was told 6 over was the "acceptable limit"! Just think though, in every town is a "bad" neighborhood. Drugs, prostitution, murder, etc. How come the cops don't just park it there and nail all the obvious criminals? I think that might even be more dangerous than pulling over speeders - in other words, it ain't gonna happen.
CJ