It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by creepyalien
All government should be totally transparent.
and All people in government.
why do they need to hide their bank accounts?
only if the are getting illegal money.
Originally posted by nosacrificenofreedom
Originally posted by N3k9Ni
Originally posted by TWISTEDWORDS
reply to post by N3k9Ni
aINT GOING TO HAPPEN, i WOULDN'T GET MY HOPES UP FOR THIS PASSING AND GETTING SIGNED.
If you wouldn't, then don't. Your choice.
I am interested in seeing if this gains any ground.
Do you really think the most powerful interest group in the world would allow us the sheeple to see the corruption,
KAOs and theft in plain view?
If we were allowed to view the feds transactions, would'nt this show what a farce the global banking system is to those in denial?
In that case would'nt the global banking system tumble especially considering the holdings of worthless derivatives the fed now holds?
I hope i'm wrong on all these opinions but i doubt it!edit on 3-7-2012 by nosacrificenofreedom because: misspelled correction!
Originally posted by txraised254
reply to post by rjbaggins
If Paul's bill passed it would remove those restrictions so you could have a FULL audit of the feds instead of a partial. I hope this bill gets passed...they want to know what I do with my money I want to know what they do with theirs.
Originally posted by MidnightTide
if it eventually passes the full House and then becomes law in unaltered or unamended form, will eliminate from Fed audits...
You think they want the mass public to know they have been sending trillions to their banker buddies?
Originally posted by wagnificent
Originally posted by MidnightTide
if it eventually passes the full House and then becomes law in unaltered or unamended form, will eliminate from Fed audits...
HR 459 was unanimously passed by the government oversight and reform committee, and it already has enough co-sponsors to ensure that it passes in the House in its present form. I agree that we have to wait for the Senate to get their act together (and for Obama to put his stamp on it), but I imagine that there is something going on that is motivating all these politicians in the House to pass this bill. Whatever that motivation is, it may light a fire under some Senator's buttocks too.
You think they want the mass public to know they have been sending trillions to their banker buddies?
I think there may be something scarier than banker buddies happening already... at least it seems that way in the House.