It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
`
Originally posted by WhisperingWinds
reply to post by IpsissimusMagus
Is it really the countries that are rich, or just the shareholders of companies/corporations in those countries?
and are the shareholders of these corporations all citizens of that country? But I guessing they would all pay taxes on income anyhow ? (oh wait, not if they know how to avoid it )
Seems misleading to say the richest countries, when it seems more like the richest individuals/or share holders of corporations within the country,and some may not even be citizens?
I know diddly squat about economics, so maybe you could explain to me how that list was derived, and and what it means in terms of the country.
I can understand if the answer would take too long to explain..but I am curious.
edit on 2-7-2012 by WhisperingWinds because: (no reason given)edit on 2-7-2012 by WhisperingWinds because: (no reason given)
www.cia.gov...
This entry records a country's net trade in goods and services, plus net earnings from rents, interest, profits, and dividends, and net transfer payments (such as pension funds and worker remittances) to and from the rest of the world during the period specified. These figures are calculated on an exchange rate basis, i.e., not in purchasing power parity (PPP) terms.
www.cia.gov...
GDP (purchasing power parity):
GDP real growth rate:
GDP - per capita (PPP):
Labor force:
Unemployment rate:
Distribution of family income - Gini Index:
Investment (gross fixed):
Taxes and other revenues:
Budget surplus (+) or deficit:
Public debt:
Inflation rate (consumer prices):
Central bank discount rate:
Commercial bank prime lending rate:
Stock of broad money:
Stock of narrow money:
Stock of domestic credit:
Market value of publicly traded shares:
Industrial production growth rate:
Electricity - production:
Electricity - consumption:
Electricity - exports:
Electricity - imports:
Oil - production:
Oil - consumption:
Oil - exports:
Oil - imports:
Oil - proved reserves:
Natural gas - production:
Natural gas - consumption:
Natural gas - exports:
Natural gas - imports:
Natural gas - proved reserves:
Current account balance:
Exports:
Imports:
Reserves of foreign exchange and gold:
Debt - external:
Stock of direct foreign investment - at home:
Stock of direct foreign investment - abroad:
Originally posted by steve1709
reply to post by Manhater
G'day manhater
Thanks for asking the question. Have you noticed that there are a lot of answers that are really NON answers? It sort of shows that maybe some people are really only worried about the ficticious "they". In other words, some people seem to THINK there must be a group or just go along with everybody else but don't really have a clue if there are TPTB or not. Just a thought. My answer is .... I have no idea. So sorry I can't help you out.
The archetype of "Tragedy and Hope" is the work of Procopius, a courtier in the time of the Byzantine emperor Justinian, whose official history, the " De Aedificiis," celebrated the accomplishments of his monarch - but who supplemented it with a secret history, the "Anecdota," in which he spilled the dirt on the emperor and his wife Theodora.
Much of the interest in Quigley's book centers around his dirt-spilling account of the machinations of international bankers and of the organizations they formed to exert influence behind-the-scenes on political and diplomatic activity, such as the Round Table, the Royal Institute of International Affairs and the Council on Foreign Relations.
While his discussion of these matters occupies a fairly small number of the book's 1300-odd pages, it has drawn the attention of so-called "conspiracy theorists," mostly on the political right (e.g. the John Birch Society) but also some on the left, such as the sociologist G. William Domhoff, who pursue much the same theme - that the domestic and international policy of the United States (and other countries) are manipulated by a "power élite" in a way that makes their supposed democracy largely a sham.
www.youtube.com...
Although geographically separate, the city-states of London, the Vatican, and the District of Colombia are one interlocking empire called Empire of The City. The flag of Washington's District of Colombia has three red stars, one for each city-state in the three city empire.
This Corporate Empire of three city-states controls the world economically through London's inner-city, militarily through the District of Colombia, and spiritually through the Vatican. From the mystery religions of ancient Egypt to the Zionist role in 9/11, Ring Of Power unrevises 4000 years of revisionist human history with never -- before -- seen revelations.
Ring Of Power puzzles together the pieces of a giant puzzle into one BIG PICTURE documentary series. ABOUT THE PRODUCER: The Producer is an experienced, award winning documentary filmmaker who, as a child, learned that her father was a member of the secretive cult of Freemasonry.
From the mystery religions of ancient Egypt to the Zionist role in 9/11, "Ring Of Power" unrevises 4000 years of revisionist human history with never - before - seen revelations. "Ring Of Power" puzzles together the pieces of a giant puzzle into one BIG PICTURE documentary series. The Producer is an experienced, award winning documentary filmmaker who, as a child, learned that her father was a member of the secretive cult of Freemasonry.
She recalls many arguments between her parents over her father's secret meetings and the exclusion of women from the brotherhood. The Masonic ring that her father wore had been passed down from father to son over the generations. When she asked her father about the meaning of the letter "G" and the compass and square on his ring, she got no response. As an adult, she decided to investigate. That investigation grew into four years of intensive research into the identity and history of the diabolical globalists who she calls the "Ring Of Power". Their goal is one World Empire and one world ruler.
Episode I: 9/11 THE UNTOLD STORY (38 min.) Half the world believes Muslims were responsible for 9/11. The other half believes Israeli Zionists were responsible. Whos right?
Episode II: HIDDEN EMPIRE (22 min.) The worlds most powerful empire is not the U.S.A. It is an empire that insiders call Empire Of The City.
Episode III: TRAIL OF THE PHARAOHS (25 min.) Did the Biblical Abraham really live to be 175? Did Moses really turn staffs into snakes and rivers into blood?
Episode IV: GOD AND THE QUEEN (30 min.) Genealogy charts show that British and French royalty are descendants of Mary Magdalene and Jesus Christ. Is it true?
Episode V: ALL THE QUEENS MEN (22 min.) How rich and powerful is Queen Elizabeth II?«
Episode VI: THE GODFATHERS (30 min.) They scammed control of the Bank of England and the U.S. Federal Reserve, then they found GOD -- Gold, Oil and Drugs.
Episode VII: CHEATING AT MONOPOLY (52 min.) How many people would play a game of monopoly if the banker was cheating and fixing the rules? Over 6 billion.
Episode VIII: ASSES OF EVIL (29 min.) The New World Order Mafia are invisible rulers who make puppets out of politicians, heroes out of villains and villains out of heroes.
Episode IX: KING OF HEARTS (22 min.) The ultimate goal of "insiders" is to disarm the world and create one world empire under one world ruler. Who is he?
Episode X: SOLUTIONS (28 min.) Protesting and writing letters to deaf politicians doesn't work. What does work?
Originally posted by EvilSadamClone
Dude, STOP OVERLOADING US WITH TOO MUCH INFORMATION!
PLEASE!
Nobody's going to watch a five hour long video. People have trouble watching a twenty minute long video.
You don't have to overload us with really large bright and shiny pictures either.
To be certain, there is a lot of information out there that people should watch and read about, but most people on a forum like this don't have long attention spans and want to keep things summarized and short and sweet.
edit on 2-7-2012 by EvilSadamClone because: (no reason given)
I was going to say the same thing.
Originally posted by Manhater
Well, technically. It was both.
I don't believe in this nonsense.
But if you do, okay by me..
Originally posted by seenavv
Originally posted by Manhater
Well, technically. It was both.
I don't believe in this nonsense.
But if you do, okay by me..
your name clearly fits your attitude
it's only nonsense for those who haven't done the research