It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

democrats sold us out to corporations!

page: 3
14
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 14 2012 @ 03:44 PM
link   
We need to expose the real agenda this outfit stands for;

The Progressive Promise

Sounds similar to the commie manifesto with many brand new code words and double-winks.

I wonder if they actually do what they say ?

They have a whole long checklist.

Read between the lines.....

Or look the other way



posted on Jul, 14 2012 @ 03:50 PM
link   
Yeah! Damn that Commie Theodore Roosevelt!



posted on Jul, 14 2012 @ 03:57 PM
link   
» To sunset expiring provisions of the Patriot Act and bring remaining provisions into line with the U. S. Constitution.

» To protect the personal privacy of all Americans from unbridled police powers and unchecked government intrusion.

» To extend the Voting Rights Act and reform our electoral processes.

» To fight corporate consolidation of the media and ensure opportunity for all voices to be heard.

» To ensure enforcement of all legal rights in the workplace.

FROM the site given in xuenchen’s post .
WOW! Freedom! That really is communistic! Ummmmmmm what was your point again?
You probably did not expect someone to actually read the site you gave.



posted on Jul, 14 2012 @ 04:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by wittgenstein
» To sunset expiring provisions of the Patriot Act and bring remaining provisions into line with the U. S. Constitution.

» To protect the personal privacy of all Americans from unbridled police powers and unchecked government intrusion.

» To extend the Voting Rights Act and reform our electoral processes.

» To fight corporate consolidation of the media and ensure opportunity for all voices to be heard.

» To ensure enforcement of all legal rights in the workplace.

FROM the site given in xuenchen’s post .
WOW! Freedom! That really is communistic! Ummmmmmm what was your point again?
You probably did not expect someone to actually read the site you gave.




Sounds like they've been real successful.

Especially the one about the media


It's all cheap talk and no action (except when they shift into reverse)



posted on Jul, 14 2012 @ 04:06 PM
link   
So what was the point of giving that site? To simply quote someone and say that they are liers is not an argument.
And yes, they have been unsuccessful. Why? Because huge resources are spent by multinational corporations to deprive us of the freedom Progressives want to deliver.
Are you actually claiming that Progressives are running multinational corporations? Progressives rather then being part of the ruling elite are actually marginalized by the media. Look at the lies told about the Occupy Wall Street movement.
edit on 14-7-2012 by wittgenstein because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 14 2012 @ 04:13 PM
link   
It is a clever propaganda technique to silence a voice for freedom by claiming that that voice should be ignored because it is part of an incredibly complicated plot to undermine those freedoms that were expressed.
Unfortunately, most people are easily confused.


edit on 14-7-2012 by wittgenstein because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 14 2012 @ 04:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by wittgenstein
Agreed, both parties are owned. All this anti-government talk I find amusing. It is like attacking the puppet and ignoring the puppeteer.


Both parties are on the same side against us. They are given designated scripts to play good cop - bad cop so WE will take sides against each other instead of the real puppeteers behind both parties. The country has been run by the CIA and Joint Chiefs ever since Ike.

So do the best you can for you and your family and extend a helping hand to your other political party neighbor. It's not their fault, it's not your fault. Go have a BBQ together.



posted on Jul, 15 2012 @ 05:41 AM
link   
reply to post by wittgenstein
 

wow. you are so smart.
where did you find that website? wiki?
i've never been to that site before.
so informative.

so because teddy was president he wasn't a commie?
how about frankie?

who cares what they call themselves, or what anyone else calls them.
fact is they are all tyrants.

did i say i loved republicans?
no
i said screw democrats, all of them.
if you have a D next to your name. screw yourself.

here is a link for you. it refers to something your friend marx wrote.
see plank 2 .
your education
maybe you should read a book, instead of trolling the internet, and using wiki as a reference.
i see you claim to have a degree in philosophy.
so you must be one of those intellectual types, who knows all. a "mastermind".
otherwise know as a tyrant.

edit on 15-7-2012 by bjax9er because: add



posted on Jul, 15 2012 @ 08:51 AM
link   
“so because teddy was president he wasn't a commie?”
bjax9er
WOW! You really do believe that Theodore Roosevelt was a commie!

“wow. you are so smart.
where did you find that website? wiki?
i've never been to that site before.”
bjax9er
UMMM That Theodore Roosevelt was a progressive is common knowledge among educated Americans. PLEASE READ MORE HISTORY!!! Actually, you have once again proven my point! That Theodore Roosevelt was a Progressive is such common knowledge that even Wiki knows it.

“here is a link for you. it refers to something your friend marx wrote…. so you must be one of those intellectual types, who knows all. a "mastermind".
otherwise know as a tyrant.”
bjax9er
So I’m a Communist tyrant and an intellectual ( yep everyone that thinks is suspect). Is that all you got? Name-calling? Well I guess I will join Theodore_Roosevelt and all the other commies like Thomas Jefferson etc! After reading your posts, sarcastically calling people a genius,(“actually genius, the term "progressive" comes from the communist party inside the u.s.” bjax9er’s response to Osiris1953) , and never offering any evidence or logic, it is obvious that you are a name-calling troll. The irony is that you "insulted " Osiris1953 by proving your own ignorance of history!



edit on 15-7-2012 by wittgenstein because: (no reason given)

edit on 15-7-2012 by wittgenstein because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 15 2012 @ 09:02 AM
link   
www.sodahead.com...
www.dailykos.com...
I guess Thomas Jefferson and the other founding fathers were commies also!

edit on 15-7-2012 by wittgenstein because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 15 2012 @ 09:03 AM
link   
reply to post by captaintyinknots
 


Bingo!!!!!!!!!!! yes you are very much right, this didn't started with Obama it started with Regan, he was the first to give more power to the corporate growing mafia at the time under his presidency.

But truly the work started much earlier during the 70s that is when the agenda was formed and taking roots.

Now America is a corporate dictatorship where private interest money choses and pay for the political candidates we are given for elections

And is getting worst, with the corporate dictatorship running the government we the people have a lose battler as they are the ones that write and pass laws to benefit themselves and screw Americas hard working tax payer

This is a reality no fiction.



posted on Jul, 15 2012 @ 09:15 AM
link   
bjax9er
YIKES!!! Those commies are everywhere!
www.dailykos.com...



posted on Jul, 15 2012 @ 09:33 AM
link   
bjax9er
I guess the fall of the Soviet Union and its embrace of unregulated Capitalism was actually a very sophisticated plot to take over the world. I realize that you have a bizarre sense of history and the fact that almost every respected historian says that Communism lost the cold war will have no impact on you.
Do you actually believe that the CEOs of most international corporations believe in the redistribution of wealth from the rich to the poor? WOW!
What on earth does it mean to say that one is a Communist that does not believe in the principles you yourself outlined (in the site you gave)? Or are you saying that those are noble goals (such as the redistribution of wealth) but that Communists do not embrace them? What are you saying? Your posts are filled with historical lies ( one example, that Progressivism was invented by Commies) , but even worse there is no consistency or logic to your reasoning.



posted on Jul, 15 2012 @ 09:45 AM
link   
“so you must be one of those intellectual types, who knows all. a "mastermind".
otherwise know as a tyrant.”
bjax9er
Goof grief! I guess in your mind, I am a mastermind. I know that you should have used the word “known” instead of “know”. I guess that alone proves that I am evil!



posted on Jul, 15 2012 @ 10:18 AM
link   
“They are given designated scripts to play good cop -bad cop so WE will take sides against each other instead of the real puppeteers behind both parties.”
Tkwasny
I like your analogy. Dems are the good cop. They pretend to be on our side and throw us a bone occasionally. Republicans (at least the elite that control the party) believe in the golden rule (those that have the gold make the rules) and ruthless en.wikipedia.org... (bad cop). I hate the Dem elite, however, at least occasionally they throw an old dog like me a bone * and those ( for now) are my only choices.
* For example they are against en.wikipedia.org... . However, the Dems give us,
www.youtube.com...
( Was fox "news" ever fair and criticize Bush when he was in office?)
Anyway,
www.youtube.com...
To call Obama a Socialist ( or Romney) is absurd. They are owned by international elite capitalists not your community college professor.



posted on Jul, 15 2012 @ 03:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by wittgenstein
Agreed, both parties are owned. All this anti-government talk I find amusing. It is like attacking the puppet and ignoring the puppeteer.

oh my, i must have struck a nerve there.
i only resort to name calling after someone condescends me. like you and osiris.
why do lefties condescend and deflect when their way of thinking is compromised?

read this
and this

and the reason i chose your second post to quote is, because you have it backwards.
the corporations are not the problem. they are the result of the problem.
if politicians were not subject to re-election and lobbyists promising contributions. there would be no massive corporate powers running the show.
lawmakers could write a law tomorrow limiting their terms and abolishing lobbying forever.
can't you see it?
the progressives are using capitalism to destroy capitalism.

oh those evil rich corporations, who we take bribes and contributions from, in return for laws benefiting them.
they, those evil rich corporations should pay their fair share.
pitting the rich against the poor is the easiest way to whatever kind of "ism" you desire.
and using the law, to achieve those means, is the fastest way, next to violence.

it's the politicians, they are the tyrants.
always have been, since the beginning of time

“Democracy is the road to socialism.”
― Karl Marx

democrats sure do love to use the word democracy. even referring to our once great republic, as a democracy.

but i misspelled the word known.

i must be a moron.





posted on Jul, 15 2012 @ 04:12 PM
link   
“Should Corporations have a bill of rights? After all, Republicans consider them people”
muse7
I agree and realize that you are being sarcastic. So I’ll be sarcastic too. I will agree with Republicans that corporations are people if a Republican agrees to have one executed. In other words dissolved and its assets sold.
So bjax9er is it still your contention that Theodore Roosevelt and Thomas Jefferson were commies?




edit on 15-7-2012 by wittgenstein because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 15 2012 @ 06:18 PM
link   
reply to post by wittgenstein
 


well if the majority of FDR cabinet, were card carrying members of the CP. is it a stretch to say that teddy was probably of the same mind?

thomas jefferson was anything but a commie.
because he had a thought about how to keep aristocrats out of government, he is somehow against corporations.
he feared government. and he understood, as well as anyone, that money buys power.
he knew that corporations would try to buy the power of the government. they always do.
i think this statement is more of a question, than a statement

“I hope we shall…crush in its birth the aristocracy of our
moneyed corporations, which dare already to challenge our government to a
trial of strength and to bid defiance to the laws of our country.”

–Thomas Jefferson, letter to George Logan, November 12, 1816

how do we keep the money out of government? how do we keep the lawmakers from voting themselves more money and more power, and further empowering the aristocracy.
not how do we "crush" corporations

and as for executing corporations. for every corporation you execute, i get to execute a labor union.
sound fair?



new topics

top topics



 
14
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join