Tony Robinson calls out British banking system. Must Watch. "Not Even Human"

reply to post by mee30


Like I said it matters not who prints it but who dictates its value

reply to post by VoidHawk


you have to start some where, id love to go rampaging down the street screaming "hang em high" but experience shows that no-one takes you seriously.

Originally posted by discolo
reply to post by VoidHawk

 

you have to start some where, id love to go rampaging down the street screaming "hang em high" but experience shows that no-one takes you seriously.

Indeed like Alex Jones says, whether you hate him or not, IT IS AN INFO WAR, like anonymous say, you cannot shoot the truth, the rampaging will come but first the facts. Join the fight WE ARE UNSTOPPABLE

and listen to this www.youtube.com...

TPTB infiltrated and killed the 60s movements They will not this time, WE SHALL OVERCOME

He could do us all a favour and do a series called "Black Adder Goe's Banking"

Originally posted by VoidHawk
Tony Robinson is doing the same as the rest of the worlds media, Blaming it on the banks.

Why?

Because the banking system as we know it is on its way out, so who better to blame than a system which is already doomed.

Tony Robinson just proved to me that he's joined the other side.

Something we should all remember.
IF ITS ON THE BBC YOU WERE MEANT TO SEE IT.

Tony Robinson has mostly worked with independant TV for years, not that it matters that much. The programme was BBC's question time, it's not live, but recorded earlier in the night with a live audience who also pose the questions which will be selected, but the texting is live as the programme is aired, not perfect by any means, but better than most. If he's joined the other side, whatever that is, he might be a little short like me, the sums are relative but, he got it got it completely right when he said, that they, (the bankers) are living in a different world and were bailed out with our money. I just don't see anything in what he said is long term providential to him in his current position, but just being honest.

reply to post by trustnothing


Yeah but that's what I've been getting at the whole time too lol... Banks are able to lend out money they don't have so they are playing the role that the government is supposed to play. I'm not just talking about the bank of england here either but smaller banks lending out money in personal loans and mortgages.

Even though I believe that the government should be done away with also...

reply to post by JailTales


1st thing i thought off actually!

reply to post by FawnyKate


I like it, his greatest role in fact, well at least he was a socialist then I guess/servant slave - Baldric in Blackadder to non UK folks

reply to post by Lightbringer38


OMG! Baldrick is speaking out! Excellent news, I haven't even watched it yet but the fact that T. Robinson is speaking out makes me ecstatic! Will comment further if I have anything else to add. Thanks for posting.

Wow, finaly a cunning plan from this great man.

his knowledge of money has improved.



jokes aside that was one of the best question time speeches i've seen.

reply to post by mee30


Indeed, a private company charging the gov to print money is one thing, a private bank doing such and then lending the gov the money at interest is just, well you know, we are on the same page here. Like I said it is the value, over used example being Soros, he devalued the pound and his vulture friends were able to buy up industy etc cheap due to the Rothschild led privitisation, same happened in Russia except they elected a hero, these Oligarch #s are being hunted. How can someone go from 0 net worth when they are born to owning siberian Oil without corruption hmmm

As I said to someone tonight, the only way to regulate government now is with a gun, they have legislated regulation out. Revolution is coming, choose your tunes.

reply to post by Lightbringer38


Ok, having watched the video, it is all still rhetoric. I admire the man for speaking out but this will change nothing. People love to applaud truth but will never make a concerted effort to change things. It makes me sad.

Originally posted by FawnyKate
He could do us all a favour and do a series called "Black Adder Goe's Banking"

And maybe he could provided "a cunning plan" for the naughty banks

Originally posted by Wide-Eyes
reply to post by Lightbringer38

 

Ok, having watched the video, it is all still rhetoric. I admire the man for speaking out but this will change nothing. People love to applaud truth but will never make a concerted effort to change things. It makes me sad.

Like I said Robinson is a prominent socialist, real labour. I prefer more direct attacks like Nigel Farage but id still never vote for either. I am Scottish, our plan is we get SNP in to get rid of English rule then kick them the # out after first term. After that it could be fun

Originally posted by thedoctorswife

Originally posted by FawnyKate
He could do us all a favour and do a series called "Black Adder Goe's Banking"

And maybe he could provided "a cunning plan" for the naughty banks

Now that is just management speak now

I don't think as some poster intimated that, Tony Robinson allows for the banks to continue as is, when he said that they should get us out of it, To me it meant that they are responsible, and no longer should have the privileges which they still enjoy at this time. They got our money in the bailout, that is where it ends after that money is gone.

reply to post by trustnothing


Yes it certainly seems we are ... I'm not exactly into the whole violent revolution though to be honest, i mean dude they hot nukes! lol Get a nuke or 2 and we might be in business, until then I'll just stick with peaceful non-compliance. I think a great deal can be learned from what ghandi did...

I've already started my rebellion and already came up against TPTB, I've even had the threat of my children being removed! I've not registered my son so they say he does not exist! lol Funny because I see him everyday... His name is anon so they say he has no name! But his name is anon, like how can he not have a name if it is anon?

Long story dude but yeah s**t has already gone down for me. We have come through it somewhat now and they have left us alone for the time being.

reply to post by smurfy


I didn't say he wants them to continue as they are now but to expect the banks who helped cause the problem to now fix the problem they caused is ludicrous. Same as expecting the government to solve the problems that they cause. Just do away with both of them so they stop causing bloody problems! This will be a good start...

His comment was like the people that think "if only we can get nice people into power"... It won't make one blind bit of difference as they would soon be corrupted.

Originally posted by mee30
reply to post by mtnshredder

 

Perhaps, i know he was limited by time but my point was he was sparked to speak out because of the interest rate fixing that has recently been revealed right? But my point is the system is criminal even without that. Ans yes I know it is a worldwide issue and that there is money floating round and round the same few.

The government is not held hostage by the banks. The government can print it's own money if it wanted to with no problems at all. Hell it could even do away with the pound if it wanted to. Just look at the euro, how many countries did it? Of course I'm not saying the euro is/was a good idea. That system is just like the one we have, and there are many more corruptions going on inside and around it... But hopefully you see my point.

The government could quite easily of let the banks fail, it might of hurt some people short term but it would of helped the system as a whole and made the banks that survived all the more responsible ( even though they should all be done away with in my opinion ).

We need a radical rethink into how business is done.

Tony said the banks should get us out of it. So he is still clinging to the idea of banks right? He wasn't calling for an end to them. Really what he pointed at was the tiniest of problems concerning the current system, kind of like complaining that a serial killer was getting blood all over the streets, and then saying that the killer should start to clean it all up so the place doesn't look a mess. While totally ignoring the fact that he is killing tons of people! lol

Hope you can see my points here...

The government could quite easily of let the banks fail, it might of hurt some people short term but it would of helped the system as a whole

Who's system? Definitely not mine and probably not yours. I don't think at least at this point in time, that the majority of elected officials are going to bite the hand that feeds them, not going to happen. 50% of congress in the US are millionaires and I'm sure similar stats would also apply to parliament and the upper political echelon in the UK. They are going to do their best to see that the banks do not fail. If the banks fail so do they. That's the biggest hurdle IMO, getting past the vested interest of our elected politicians and the people that keep them in champagne and caviar. We are very far off from seeing that happen. I would like to think otherwise but I don't.

Take a look at some of the corporate Board of Directors and the dots really start connecting to how bought and paid for our government's are.

I do see some of the points you are trying to make though, not trying to be ignorant to the issue. The fact that it's one big mud puddle was no doubt by design. We may have to agree to disagree but the banks own our gov IMO. Lobbyist have killed democracy among politics in todays world.

reply to post by mtnshredder

And what about that last statement about them getting us into it they should get us out of it? Well that isn't really true now is it! The government bailed the #ers out! They didn't steal our money, the government gave it to them! Shouldn't they be sharing some blame here tony?

From my very first comment on page 2... We do not disagree my friend i think you have taken me out of context. I agree with you 100%. I merely was saying they COULD. What I'm saying is actually backing up what you just said because the fact that they are NOT doing what I described points to their guilt in all this...

Why on earth is the government loaning money of these scumbags then giving it back to them with interest? Then giving them even more in bailouts? Like WTF! It makes no sense! For a start why don't the government just print it's own money interest free? Because they are all a bunch of crooks! The whole system is a giant ponzi scheme scam!

Also from my first comment on page 2... Perhaps you missed this one? Maybe it would of put the rest of what I said into context a little...

They are indeed all a bunch pf criminals, perhaps I threw you a little by saying that the banks do not own the government. What I meant by that really is that IF the government was truly for us they could do this and that... But yeah they are one in the same.

Sorry for the confusion.