It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Elimination of World Problems.

page: 1
3

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 30 2012 @ 04:15 PM
link   
Shouldn't the world work on solving and eliminating problems like hunger, health, shelter etc.. not sustaining them for profit of few? What do you think prevents us from being completely free from bondage of jobs, poverty, disease, hunger? Would it be possible to create a world where everyone is content and does what pleases them, and doesn't take joy in what could be/is considered bad for one for all and earth? What would this utopia entail, what ideals would lead the change?




posted on Jun, 30 2012 @ 04:25 PM
link   
Free/Socialized education, power and medicine.
Real democracy where people would have voting power on laws.
Focus on environment friendly and sustainable solutions for all daily needs.
Mechanize our industries, construction and transport.
Focus on well being, spirituality, science, sports and arts.
End wars with an honorable system of competition for unresolvable conflicts.



posted on Jun, 30 2012 @ 04:34 PM
link   
reply to post by metatronobody
 


The answer would certainly not be the New World Order and Agenda 21 .Socialism is not the answer either which would be the mechanism of the NWO . I feel a new much more important set of problems to solve will soon arrive in a world near you soon .



posted on Jun, 30 2012 @ 04:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by metatronobody

What do you think prevents us from being completely free from bondage of jobs, poverty, disease, hunger?
We do. (Humans)


Would it be possible to create a world where everyone is content and does what pleases them, and doesn't take joy in what could be/is considered bad for one for all and earth?
We are too greedy.


What would this utopia entail, what ideals would lead the change?
Worldwide Genocide
Eliminate humanity = No more problems.



posted on Jun, 30 2012 @ 05:26 PM
link   
reply to post by BrokenCircles
 


“In the hour of our Twilight we will be together soon, if we will be anything at all.” -Trent Reznor



posted on Jun, 30 2012 @ 06:18 PM
link   
You just kill all humans.

why do I have food in the shop that comes from All over the world?
all the unemploid could work on farms
and we would have all the food we need.
the rest could help others in need.

mankind will NOT help each othere.
no money in it...



posted on Jun, 30 2012 @ 06:39 PM
link   
reply to post by metatronobody
 


lol under the heading please get me started, as opposed to don't get me started...

Well we are hammering out a plan as we speak. Now its a global economic development plan, with something in it for everyone.
188 countries in the UN, and 188 countries in the IMF.
The New World Order committee.

And they have managed to raise 456 billion without America, thus far. As part of a global economic recovery plan but with eyes towards Europe and its financial banking problems.

So we are trying to hammer out a deal, since we are already in the process of rebuilding the Silk Road with the SCO. A deal to expand that globally. So to do that we need more hubs. So we could afford 90, 5 billion dollar trade hubs. To create employment. Now if we do this, we could use cloud distribution methods, and store surpluses, turn some crops into MRE's for emergencies, rather than see them spoil, and then rotate the surplus by distributing it to the poor. So these trade hubs, if they are to be tied to the Internet, as a shadow on the ground of the Internet, a physical Internet for Internet shopping, and trade and commerce,they need to reflect its values. And that means we count a lot on community spirit and goodwill.

So what did Stockton California in, is that no one keeps stock on hand anymore. Just in time inventory.
They want to drop ship from the manufacturer wherever possible. With on-line sales and in grocery products its difficult to compete maybe. I think its just a lack of markets and an improper marketing strategy.

But if we build 90 hubs, then we will need the same equipment in each, and save huge dollars which we can put towards the sciences to give the places a more Internet feel. How we do that is we get universities involved and they can use the facilities to do science. So we want conveyor belts and we want magic. But, we are willing to pay for it. They will bank the money they save, and then you can persuade them to try things.

As far as global food management and distribution and emergency food management it will work with the UN in that regard because the UN is in charge of that. So you see we want donated land, we want it to be the property of this global organization, and we want the G20 to mange it. A capitalist for profit organization that spends its profit on the public good.
It will have a small shipping department that will go head to head with Fed Ex and the rest and they can use the facilities as well. Toll fee. Retail space rentals pays for management and we try to get Internet billionaires to sit on the board for almost nothing. As their duty to mankind and so they can play and have fun.

edit on 30-6-2012 by Rocketman7 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 30 2012 @ 06:46 PM
link   
There is one solution which would solve a majority of our problems and create a world in which humans live in balance with the natural world. This solution would ensure plenty of work, food, medical care, shelter and all the other necessities of life. It would put an end to our reliance on the destruction of natural resources and likely lead to a more peaceful world where there is less dog eat dog competition among people of every class. The only problem is that no one likes this solution.

The one thing no one likes to mention is that a massive reduction in the worlds overall population would solve a great many of the problems we face today.

We wouldn't have to kill anyone, just reduce the amount of new people being born. If we could even limit everyone all over the world to just one child then we would see a decrease in population numbers and an increase in available resources.

I don't understand the need to have 3 or 4 or 5 children. Some people have 10+ At least 90% of these children will never grow up to contribute anything of value to future generations. Keep it to one child, let older generations pass, this will solve many problems.

Of course, no one likes this idea. Many probably think I'm evil for even mentioning it. I don't really care, I'm just being realistic.



posted on Jun, 30 2012 @ 06:59 PM
link   
reply to post by Rocketman7
 


So then how does the cloud system work to feed the hungry masses? 7 billion people almost eat every day.

Well you know when you are setting out to do a 500 billion dollar project, the last thing you want to do, in order for that project to succeed, is to not say you are going to give that money to the poor.

Its investor money, tax money, bank funds, to lend, to cover budgets, to keep people working and fed and to keep them from dying of sickness and hunger in Europe. You know.

And so we cannot focus on the ones that need help all at once when the way to help them, is to build a strong global business, and put the profits towards relief of all kinds.

If there was a Katrina, and you had hubs set up in a proper distribution system with nodes, the way cloud distribution works is that clouds form then it rains. If you drop off a can of beans on your way to work at the depot for Katrina, since the depots are so convenient and functionally spaced, and Twitter and Facebook are fast moving trend systems, other cans hit the depot, and you have tons and tons of food in no time at all all arriving like a flow.

There is no other system on earth, that can transmit 4 gigabit files to the country in hours. That shows you how much data you can move. Hundreds of thousands of people networking, and they all have pieces that each other need. So you can move goods the same way. The next level down from cloud distribution is way down there. from 4 gigabit to 4 megabit using P2P.

And the rules are the same for moving data or moving goods. Including food.

So for us to not do this, is to stare science in the face and not take advantage of a very well tested impervious network for trade and commerce.

edit on 30-6-2012 by Rocketman7 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 30 2012 @ 07:23 PM
link   
reply to post by Rocketman7
 


So then, in almost no time at all we have began to reconstruct the Silk Road, we have raised 456 billion and had several global conferences and are now drawing a line in the sand at Syria.

Strategic political boundary. However we can easily offset that need for well defined physical barrier, with a global trade network. A new one that everyone can enjoy building together. And we have some great ideas and part of that of course is to create jobs. Primarily in the case of, where they are needed meets economic opportunity.
Stockton, needed, unemployment 18 percent, city filed for bankruptcy, economic opportunity: center of California Farmland. Organic fresh produce or specialized produce is completely doable in that region, and getting it to market and delivering supplies and financing crops, is how America was made.

So Barack Obama I think would be the best man in America to get 44 billion into the IMF fund, to secure a position for the US in the new trade zone, which will provide a very high degree of service to business and commerce and banking, world-wide, with data centers close by for backups and point of sale systems with backup power generation for warehousing and security for the facilities.

A physical representation of Internet trade and commerce as close as we can come to maintaining that since the Internet has crossed borders and works.

So we are building your dad's Internet. A boring encrypted data network, but a fast efficient one, and a secure one for business and banking. And thats so we can ship things efficiently and people can just click to pay.

If Obama needs to find a place to come up with the money, trim 44 billion off the military budget of 6 trillion slated over the next 4 years. They usually have a reserve of about 600 billion. That they don't even budget against. They budget at 5.4 or similar even though we authorize 6 trillion.

Now the way that they get something for their money is they get to apply for jobs when they are out of the military. And we will try to employ them.
edit on 30-6-2012 by Rocketman7 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 1 2012 @ 08:55 PM
link   
Killing all humans is a bit extreme, I think.. Isnt there a better way, I mean we are humans after all, we can think we can fix things and make them better.

Do too many people profit from useless ideas/ creations and satisfaction for personal gains or interests, easy profit mechanisms like feeding on peoples weaknesses, fantasies and sensual temptations, draining our natural resources, instead of finding ways of ridding the world and peoples minds of such diseases?

Will the world will survive the perpetual descent into indulgence of selfish desires of its rapidly growing mass, if no one will fight for a selfless causes? What is a selfless, does it have to be, how can we make it rewarding and realize its benefits?

Overpopulation statement, makes some sence, what will happen if everyone keeps breeding uncontrollably and we have a society based on selfish consumerism, wont this destroy us from within, could this be compared to cancer? Why isnt there a limit on the uncontrollable baby making, atleast at this point?

Is war necessary? Can conflict be resolved without resorting to force?



posted on Jul, 1 2012 @ 11:36 PM
link   
reply to post by Shadowflux
 


I don't think we will have to worry about a population reduction . The upcoming Middle East War some call the Gog & Magog war will reduce population automatically as it becomes a global nuclear exchange . If not Fukushima doesn't get us first . Even if all else fails the food can only support so many people .



posted on Jul, 1 2012 @ 11:42 PM
link   
reply to post by Rocketman7
 


You do know that you are talking living under Socialism with this NWO you are talking about . The NWO advocates a drastic population reduction of 80 to 95 % . If you survive the plague they are working on so hard you will not be able to own a home or car and a great many other things . Google search < Agenda 21 > this is the NWO global guide line for your enslavement .



new topics

top topics



 
3

log in

join