Ok, I can't see that this link has been posted yet (but I could be wrong ...).
news.bbc.co.uk...
"A web wise terror network
By Gordon Corera
BBC security correspondent
The capture of alleged al-Qaeda computer expert Mohamed Naem Noor Khan by the Pakistani authorities in July brought with it an unprecedented haul of
high-tech intelligence. "
----
I found it an interesting article. To be honest, not much of the thrust of it should come as too much of a surprise, but it's a useful and
referenced summary, and one that could provoke revised debate about familiar topics such as civil liberties vs security, online privacy, should
"information be free", that kind of thing.
A couple of immeditate thoughts that come to mind:
Is the risk of an unmoderated internet
sufficiently outweighed by the opportunity for detection and infiltration by government agencies ?
(No question in mind on this).
-or-
Who is better served by posting material on the internet - information warfare cuts both ways after all, and often one can't tell which message is
really intended for whom ... and whilst this is hardly a new strategy of course, the wide penetration of the internet gives this somewhat
increased potential over it's history.
Perhaps the most interesting point (for me) tho' - is that it makes much more explicit (to, what we'll describe as the more
casual observers
of world events), that the internet is [now] as much of a 'battle front' as anywhere else is ...
(Hmm, patched the holes in your server OS's lately ?).