It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by aaron2209
reply to post by 13th Zodiac
It is based on the idea that over time business will see an expense that can be limited so will attempt to limit it.
What kind of business wouldn't try to cut costs?
Also we don't have referendums on every piece of legislation.edit on 30-6-2012 by aaron2209 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by aaron2209
reply to post by mainidh
So are you telling me that a business paying $500M a year in carbon tax (a number out of thin air) wouldn't look at that figure and think "Hmmm how can we lower this by utilising less pollution producing methods"?
That will be the first thing they do.
Originally posted by Romekje
Originally posted by aaron2209
reply to post by mainidh
So are you telling me that a business paying $500M a year in carbon tax (a number out of thin air) wouldn't look at that figure and think "Hmmm how can we lower this by utilising less pollution producing methods"?
That will be the first thing they do.
No, they won't.
They will simply adjust the price of their services/goods to compensate for the tax by billing it on the user side.
Originally posted by aaron2209
If those costs are all per week, then that equals $291.20 per year. If I'm getting a tax cut of $300 per year, I'm actually ahead.
The world will not end tomorrow because of the carbon tax.
Originally posted by aaron2209
Originally posted by stanguilles7
So, if you cut back your use of electricity, etc, do you still get to keep the $300 rebate? That could end up being a net gain for a lot of people, no?
Indeed but fear mongering is fun
Originally posted by BeforeTheHangmansNoose
reply to post by daaskapital
This pisses me right off.
You know what pisses me off more then the actual tax itself?
Is the fact that Gillard looked 22 million people in the eye and lied straight to their face. That is what i would equate to a stray dog coming into your house and dragging it's ass along your carpet then you being forced to pay to get it cleaned
Living in SA, we have the highest electricity bills on Earth and it's still increasing, i am looking forward to this tax, immensely.
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
it's sad
sad that we have to be threatened with a tax to realize we are killing the planet that gives us life
and sadder that the governements can't just stand up to them on their own, they have to go through the back door and force conservation via threats of taxes
Originally posted by Power_Semi
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
it's sad
sad that we have to be threatened with a tax to realize we are killing the planet that gives us life
and sadder that the governements can't just stand up to them on their own, they have to go through the back door and force conservation via threats of taxes
Oh get real, how on earth can a tax save the environment?
What next, the flu tax to try and stop people coming down with seasonal illnesses.
It's ridiculous, if you've swallowed the baloney of the environment that has been used to justify the creation of a carbon trading platform and tax then I feel sorry for you.
The carbon trading platform is basically trading in a hypothesis - carbon credits - something created from nothing and that you now have to pay for.
It will make those controlling the markets $Trillions - that is what it's all about.edit on 30-6-2012 by Power_Semi because: (no reason given)edit on 30-6-2012 by Power_Semi because: (no reason given)