reply to post by dogstar23
I'm not looking for the top thread, I'm just one man that is looking to give back what is lost to all.
We are told we need oxygen to live right? Wrong. It turns out that oxygen has a the right amount of electrons to keep us running. This is why orthodox
scientist refuse the fact that we are electrical beings.
I'll get you through the basics of how it works. Your lungs act like sponges for electrons, when you breath in, your taking the positive charge of the
oxygen and when you breath out your exhaling something stronger, CO2.
So in a basic sense, O2, is a positive charge,
Your lungs are a positive charge,
You take in the O2, and the blood passes through the lungs. They were previously a negative charge, now a positive due to the exchange.
Because of the exchange, the blood is repelled away from the lungs and the CO2 is exhaled out.
But to the Main Reason Why We Can Live Without Oxygen.
Like I said on how we are electrical being, and like electricity it needs a source. We can live without food or water even air. But because I'm typing
this, I'm forced back to the basic breath in and breath out.
If there was a source so strong on the outside that was giving all of this (real word) life-force, then there will be no need for food, water, or
How so? Like oxygen, it has a positive charge, if you stop breathing, you'll feel cut off from your source, and will feel like dying. But if there was
an everlasting source, then breathing is a burden.
Monks, people that focus only on meditation, and any of those who feel at peace, have the chance to never breath for however long they want.
But if scientist really want to do this, then do it with an outside source.
This may be a lot to take in, but I question; Why do I have to rely on a needle that injects a possible poison when I can do it in my room in a week,
edit on 30-6-2012 by FreedomCommander because: (no reason given)