Except none of them are the same. Allah is not God of the Bible, though they claim he is because "Allah" means God. That's retarded. My friend Charles is a pretty swell dude. I don't suppose it would be logical to claim he is the same as Charles Manson? No? Why not? They share the same name..

The Muslim's claim that Allah is the God of the Bible and that Islam arose from the religion of the prophets and apostles is refuted by solid, overwhelming archeological evidence. Islam is nothing more than a revival of the ancient Moon-god cult. It has taken the symbols, the rites, the ceremonies, and even the name of its god from the ancient pagan religion of the Moon-god. As such, it is sheer idolatry and must be rejected by all those who follow the Torah and Gospel.

I want to be proven wrong, it's what I need, it's what I seek, because what I want is the truth, not some comfortable explanation.

Originally posted by gosseyn
reply to post by Akragon

---

Well, you can skim through my posts and threads and see the subjects in which I am interested. For example in this thread, I said that there is no "good" and "evil" as absolute values imposed onto us by a entity/god, so far no one gave me an answer or tried to contradict me. Can you prove me wrong on that matter? I would appreciate that.

You see, that's the point, I don't have to chose between any set of belief systems, I don't need beliefs, I want knowledge, and if there is something that we don't know, I label it as "unknown" until further knowledge.

Here's what I posted earlier on the subject

"Of course morals are subjective, but what you seem to ignore is that we are all members of the same species, and because of that fact, we share a certain number of things.
To start, we share the same brain, with the same functions. Have you ever heard about empathy, or mirror neurons ? It's what enables us to feel inside us what others may feel inside them, it's what enables us also to learn through imitating, mimicking. Everything you listed is completely explainable within the natural world, without having to resort to a magical being.
There's no "good" or "evil", but there is only suffering/pain and well-being. "Do to others as you would have them do to you" is human philosophy, and not divine commandment. It is human philosophy derived from biological constraints.

Besides, and just for the fun, in a war it is acceptable to kill someone, you can even become a "hero" for doing so. It is acceptable to kill, lie, steal, destroy, if the "others" are considered enemies, so thanks to the subjective and geometrically variable nature of morals. Also, we have seen tribes where "having sex with everyone you see" is morally acceptable and even encouraged. "

Do you agree or disagree with that ?

Originally posted by windword
reply to post by RevelationGeneration

---

Nah, there's more evidence for Buddha than Jesus. There's even more evidence of Mohamed than the Biblical Jesus.

Originally posted by randyvs

---

The historicity of Jesus of Nazareth is practically indisputable

and only a FOOL would argue otherwise.

There is every bit as much to substantiate Xenu's existence, as there is Christ (nothing).

Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
reply to post by Cogito, Ergo Sum

---

Jesus certainly existed and that is a fact without a shadow of a doubt. If you want to claim otherwise you are going against everything we have written in history. In fact the radical absurd claim that he never existed is relatively new past 300 years since Darwinism took off, and then more recently with the zeitgeist deception. You do not have to believe he was God in the flesh, but claiming he never even existed is just plain dishonesty. If you can't be honest with yourself why should anyone take you seriously? Please think before you make such ill thought-out posts.I suggest you do some real unbiased research and you will discover the truth that he existed, still exists, and always has existed.