It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Dr Mengele
If you are serious about researching into the White Pride / White Power scene, I suggest you take a look at this website: www....[hate-site-nolink]/
ltd602
As I recall, Hitler used the exact same phrase 'racial instinct" in his Mein Kampf
dr mengele
A few of my own personal thoughts, read at your own risk!
The White race
Socrates, Aristotle, Plato, Homer, Tacitus, Julius Ceaser,
Now, why, as a white man, should I be ashamed of my skin, culture & heritage?
Is it not time for the black race to move on and perhaps THANK the white man for giving him a chance to live in this great country?
What has Martin Luther King, as a ever done for YOU as a white man?
EQUALITY IS EARNT!
What have they contributed? Crime, drugs and other atrocities.
Now don't get me wrong, I am not racist.
Originally posted by Dr Mengele
Quote: America is made better by immigration.
My girlfriend was gangraped by 13 mexicans.
My sister was gangraped by 2 blacks.
I've had 3 cars stolen by mexicans / blacks, I've been mugged 5 times.
It might be bad luck, but It serves me right for living in Mexifornia.
1500 border jumpers a day... thats a good thing? I think not.
Originally posted by Dr Mengele
Personal thoughts aside, I am not a member of the KKK nor will I ever be. However I have contacts within the KKK that provide me with information, some of which you may be interested in.
Scope and History: The Ku Klux Klan was founded in 1865 in Pulaski, Tennessee. Started by a small group of confederate veterans, the Klan quickley attracted whites who feared the new social order that came with the end of slavery and the new social poitions of blacks. Unable to come to grips with the new realities of the post-Civil War South, Kan members resorted to a compaign of terror and violence against former slaves.
*SNIP*
www.texaspolicecentral.com
The following is reprinted with permission from Avra Shapiro, Director, Public Relations, Simon Wiesenthal Center, Los Angeles CA.
Originally posted by Dr Mengele
[some junk about "the bell curve']
Even if you believe in the relevance of IQ tests it still is apparent
that the difference in scores between groups can easily be accounted by
environmental factors. Mind you, I am not arguing that there is no
genetic component in this, my training is in biochemistry and medicine
so I am well aware of the influence of biology, but there is ample
evidence that environment plays a profound role in the development of
intelligence.
Research in neurobiology has elegantly shown that mice which are reared
with less stimulation grow up to be less intelligent than the ones who
had lots of environmental stimulation.
Anyone claiming that one's genetic heritage determines 40-
80% of their intelligence must necessarily base that
determination on a scientific genetic analysis - not a color
card. I would be very interested to see how the genetic makeup of
Hispanics differ from that of Portuguese, or Poles, and how that
of Jews differs from that of French, or Berbers. And, I suppose,
if Jews have a particular genetic makeup, how about Muslims, or
Hare Krishnas?
No, these are not people interested in exploring ideas.
Their wholly discredited "Eugenics"
Fischer found that IQ gaps exist between dominant and subordinate groups in
a society. There is an IQ gap between blacks and whites in America, natives
and Koreans in Japan, Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews in Israel, and
Protestants and Catholics in Northern Ireland. When economic conditions
improve for the subordinated groups, the gaps close
One source for the research funding was The Pioneer Fund, a neo-Nazi group that is a big booster of eugenics - a philosophy that maintains "genetically unfit'' individuals or races are a threat to society.
"the person who did most of the research for the bell curve":
"What is called forhere is not genocide, the killing off of the population of incompetent cultures. But we do need to think realistically in terms of the `phasing out' of such peoples...Evolutionary progress means the extinction of the less competent. To think otherwise is mere sentimentality.''
The researchers that provided the data for the claim that the IQs of blacks are 15 points lower than whites - R. Travis Osborne, Frank C.J. McGurk and Audrey Shuey - all have received money from The Pioneer Fund. For example, Osborne got about $400,000 from Pioneer to do a study on black genetic nferiority that favored the restoration of school segregation.
> > Hans Eysenck, University of London
An old standby in the race/IQ controversy. Taken to
citing Cyril Burt's manufactured "statistics". Recipient
of Pioneer Fund grants.
> > Robert A. Gordon, Johns Hopkins University
> >
> > Linda S. Gottfredsen, University of Delaware
Both Pioneer Fund recipients.
> > Seymour W. Itzkoff, Smith College
Pioneer Fund recipient.
> > Arthur R. Jensen, U.C. Berkeley
Pioneer Fund recipient. [and, as someone else notes, he is a professor of literature as his signature on anything invovling biology and neurochemistry is completely meaningless, iow, he's a filler]
> > Richard Lynn, University of Ulster at Coleraine
Pioneer Fund recipient.[as mentioned by a seperate person above, this person was, well, part of the bell curve 'study' in the first place]
> > R. Travis Osborne, University of Georgia
Pioneer Fund recipient.
[snip]
> > J. Philippe Rushton U. of Western Ontario
Pioneer Fund recipient. Did a "study" of how penis size is
inversely related to intelligence. Guess he must feel an
urge to excuse his inadequacy. A most unseemly and horrid
work; you can find it on the net if you look. How such a
paper _ever_ got published, I haven't the slightest.
If you scratch the surface of almost any of the prominent race scientists of recent decades, you will find the same well-endowed institution: the Pioneer Fund. Established in 1937 to "improve the character of the American people" by promoting the study of eugenics and the procreation of descendants of the original white colonial stock, Pioneer has funded many of the leading Anglo-American race scientists of the last several decades.
they make no effort to control for collinearity of their chief explanatory variables; nor do they provide sensitivity tests, or explore alternative model specifications and estimators (on these and related problems, see Heckman 1995; and especially Currie and Thomas 1999). They also fail to distinguish clearly between the concepts of heritability and genetic determination (on this see Block 1995).
These are critical failings, to be sure. But more troubling to my mind is their objectionably simplistic policy analysis.
Nothing is wrong with Scientific American. Its editors, like most
intelligent thinkers about science, have pegged TBC for what it is:
psuedoscientific racist propaganda replete with discredited studies, bad
methodology and unjustified conclusions. Clearly the most influential
piece of psuedoscience written recently.
You need to take a long hard look at _Mankind Quarterly_, the
unrefereed journal published by the Pioneer Institute (whose racist
agenda is well known) from which many of these studies are drawn. I was
just down at the library looking at its articles, some of which are merely
innocuous while others are so bad they're downright funny. I suggest
also that you read Gould's _Mismeasure of Man_ and another excellent book
on IQ testing, _The Politics of IQ_.
Then read TBC again, noting its shifting definitions of race and
intelligence and the bogus, 19th-century hereditarian theory of IQ which
underlies it. Murry et al have written a propaganda piece which is sheer
nonsense, though its use of language is devious and subtle enough to
approach brilliance.
Disturbing as I find the anachronism of "The Bell Curve," I am even more distressed by its pervasive disingenuousness. The authors omit facts, misuse statistical methods, and seem unwilling to admit the consequences of their own words.
Originally posted by LL1
Show your friend's father this I'm sure he'll love it....
Originally posted by theron dunn
We3ll, NOT that i am defending those racist sobs, but we MUST allow them to exist, else free speech is a hollow thing. Free speech is defending to the death another man's right to call for with his every breath that which you would give your last breath to oppose...
Originally posted by Mirthful Me
Originally posted by Dr Mengele
Personal thoughts aside, I am not a member of the KKK nor will I ever be. However I have contacts within the KKK that provide me with information, some of which you may be interested in.
Scope and History: The Ku Klux Klan was founded in 1865 in Pulaski, Tennessee. Started by a small group of confederate veterans, the Klan quickley attracted whites who feared the new social order that came with the end of slavery and the new social poitions of blacks. Unable to come to grips with the new realities of the post-Civil War South, Kan members resorted to a compaign of terror and violence against former slaves.
*SNIP*
Impressive. Do your "contacts" happen to be to be this website?
www.texaspolicecentral.com...
Because your post is a copy and paste from it (sans spelling errors).