It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Originally posted by macman
There is no Utopia. Society should not try to rule everyone, for the sake of a few. Again, collective/hivementality.
It suprises me how some long time military member, which is all about duty and honor, can THEN turn around and say exactly what I quoted you as saying. Are you selective in 'duty and honor' as long as you know you are representing the bottom line of corporations and the hell with ordinary citizens? It sure seems so and it is horrible logic.
Common sense and discipline go a long way. Nevermind you probably never finished west point or annapolis, and I am talking to some low ranked corporal with a dishonorable discharge.edit on 10/7/12 by EarthCitizen07 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Originally posted by NavyDoc
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
They make fun of people who do not have jobs, constantly mocking them into the ground and abusing them, pretending to be totally oblivious of the actual causes. They pretend to have no idea what global free trade is/was, what tariffs are, the extent of banks and wall street extortion against the non-wealthy.
It is a lost cause in america. What really suprises me is that some people have no morals, no decency, no common sense, nothing. They are totally in it for THEMSELVES which exemplifies selfishness and borders with evil. The higher up you go the more this superiority complex reigns supreme.
Who is more selfish? Someone who wants to keep what they earn to take care of themselves and their family or someone who wants to take what they did not earn from someone else to take care of a family they will not take care of themselves?
Those "evil wealthy" are some of the most generous people out there and America leads the world in individual charitible giving. There is a radical difference between individual charity and forced charity. Conservatives laud the former and hate the latter.
I believe your sarcasm fell on deaf ears. I am well aware of trust funds, shell companies, tax haven nations, make-believe tax deductions, hedge funds, digging in your backyard and filling bags with $100 bills, using freeman on the land logic, etc. I could not care less if the highest bracket is 39% WHEN there are more loopholes in the tax code than prime grade swiss cheese.
Wealthy people are no saints. Just because they donate money to build libraries, to research cures for diseases, to build sport faciliites, or whatever other donations they make it is peanuts compared to the billions they keep locked up in secure accounts. You must be ignorant or gullible(probably both) to not see how they use donations as smoke screens for tax evasion and sympathy. I heard the masons are charitable as well, does that mean they are good little boys?
Originally posted by NavyDoc
They invest that money in hopes of either growing it or living off the dividends. That infuses wealth into the economy.
Originally posted by habitforming
Originally posted by NavyDoc
They invest that money in hopes of either growing it or living off the dividends. That infuses wealth into the economy.
My economics teacher and I want to know how that works.
Originally posted by NavyDoc
And by the same tolken, wealthy people are not evil by the very nature of being wealthy. In addition, they do not sit on piles of money like Scrooge McDuck--you don't become wealthy or stay wealthy for long doing that. They invest that money in hopes of either growing it or living off the dividends. That infuses wealth into the economy.
You are right that our leftist, progressive income tax system that penalizes success inspires people to seek out ways to protect their assets and politicians to create exemptions and loopholes to buy votes. This is why a flat tax that everyone pays on income with no exeptions or a national sales tax are much fairer and streamlined options than the system we have now.
So is it possible for you to have a discussion with someone without resorting to insults? Just curious.
Originally posted by NavyDoc
Sounds like he needs a little Adam Smith. When a wealthy person buys a yacht, or a second house, or a nice meal, that money supports homebuilders, architects, waiters, chefs, etc and goes into the economy.
When a wealthy person invests in the market, in hopes of increasing his wealth, that money is used as venture capital, used by companies to expand, to purchase raw materiels, to advertise, and so forth, and goes into the economy.
Your econ teacher understands how the market works, I hope.
How many wealthy people does your econ teacher know who sit on a pile of cash like Scrooge McDuck and neither spend nor invest it nor even earn a little interest on it? Even a deposit into a simple savings account goes out there in the economy in the form of loans. Where does your econ prof think simple interest comes from?