It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by michael1983l
reply to post by Mr Headshot
Yeah I am starting to get the picture here, Americans value their dollar more than they value their neighbours life. I get it now.
Originally posted by beezzer
Originally posted by michael1983l
That is where you are so wrong, healthcare is a right, just as the ability to breathe air is. Why would healthcare not be a right? Why would you not want to practice life preservation wherever possible? Is life that cheap to you that it has a pricetag?
To be honest I am flabberghasted by that comment, I never really knew that capitalism could make people regard life so cheaply.
Healthcare is not up to the government to grant or allow.
It is up to the individual.
Your argument would have the government determining what we can eat, drink, put in our bodies.
Your argument precludes the fact that our bodies are not ours, but instead, are property of the state.
Your "fail" reeks epically.
Why would you not want to practice life preservation wherever possible?
Originally posted by Mr Headshot
reply to post by michael1983l
I'm glad I'm not a member of a tribe.
Originally posted by michael1983l
reply to post by jhn7537
I think you will find that most countries national health services are doing exactly that already. It is America that is behind the times here and it has become apparent why, you have been programmed to be selfish and self significant so much so that your human regard for life has been erroded. I'm leaving this subject here now I think, theres no point arguing this out with you, I'm just glad I don't live in the USA.
Originally posted by Cosmic911
And, if I may, it is not capitalism that has made people regard life so cheaply. I find this statement biased by the author's preconceived notion of capitalism, therefore, this statement has failed to capture the intended credibility.
Based upon the author's following statement, I'm led to believe this person does not work in the healthcare industry. As a healthcare professional myself, I consider this statement naive; it lacks real-world experience that would negate the asking of such a question. I do not say this lightly or intend to offend the author.
Originally posted by michael1983l
reply to post by jhn7537
Theres some things to rightly complain about in your governments taxation, but keeping somebody alive just isn't one of them. I cannot believe how selfish some people can be when they are worried that some of their tax dollars might go towards keeping somebody alive and that they see no direct benefit from that. Reality check.... if you saw somebody knocked down in the street by a car, would you not help them just because thhey are poor?
I'm sorry but if this is how most American people think then God Bless the Fact I do not live in the USA.
Originally posted by Cosmic911
reply to post by beezzer
You clearly misunderstood my post. In fact, I concur with your post. My rebuttal was directed towards Michael19831, not you. It was his quote I was commenting on. Come on beezzer, if you can't keep up I'm sure it was confusing because I included both yours and his quotes.
Originally posted by Doodle19815
It is simple really, People don't like change. For better or worse.
Originally posted by michael1983l
Why would any civilized person complain about making primary healthcare available to all instead of just those that have the cash to pay for it?
How can a population of a developed nation like the USA complain about paying extra taxes for this when their current government invests more money in war than all other nations combines accross the globe?
Just saying.
If you have a job you can afford healthcare
If a person is making only $1,500 dollars, a fine or a payment of several hundred dollars is a big hit out of their paycheck.
Originally posted by QuantifedInfinity
Originally posted by michael1983l
reply to post by jhn7537
Theres some things to rightly complain about in your governments taxation, but keeping somebody alive just isn't one of them. I cannot believe how selfish some people can be when they are worried that some of their tax dollars might go towards keeping somebody alive and that they see no direct benefit from that. Reality check.... if you saw somebody knocked down in the street by a car, would you not help them just because thhey are poor?
I'm sorry but if this is how most American people think then God Bless the Fact I do not live in the USA.
Then why pray tell are you even commenting on a country you are not a part of?...
Your view is jaded, because you are already a part of a socialist system, WE--The--People.. "are not"...
Freedom is never "free"...
IN our country, liberals and lawyers, have done so much harm to our country, that if one was to help someone in the street, the lawyers of the person who was helped, would go after the person who helped for aggravated injuries, mental stress disorders, and loss of wages (and those are only the highlights)..
Then we have the opposite problems with conservatives, who think only of themselves at the expense of others (in this respect, the liberals and conservatives are the same )...
We have no balance, only the illusion of it..
Our Constitution does not allow for forced (fascists) health care policies.. you cannot force another to do what they wish not to do...
Freedom is not all roses and parties 24/7/365 ... it is bloody, callous at times, and very demanding of the inhabitants to maintain it's rights for all in this country..
It is up to the individuals to decide within the boundaries of the state they reside in, to help, setup organizations, work policies "locally", while the ONLY job the government has legally,, is to "insure sovereign u.s. citizens are afforded all the benefits of the Constitution, against all foreign "and" domestic enemies"..
A job it is sorely lacking in it's "true" duties...
All government (by Constitutional laws) is in violation of all Constitutional laws, and therefore are guilty of high treason..
But even now, it still requires "We--The--People" to correct this problem, simply because the laws are "ours" to protect, and insure are upheld...
We are the final solution... Not the government...edit on 30-6-2012 by QuantifedInfinity because: errors
Source
A good samaritan in legal terms refers to someone who renders aid in an emergency to an injured person on a voluntary basis. Usually, if a volunteer comes to the aid of an injured or ill person who is a stranger, the person giving the aid owes the stranger a duty of being reasonably careful. A person is not obligated by law to do first aid in most states, not unless it's part of a job description. However, some states will consider it an act of negligence though, if a person doesn't at least call for help. Generally, where an unconscious victim cannot respond, a good samaritan can help them on the grounds of implied consent. However, if the victim is conscious and can respond, a person should ask their permission to help them first.