It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by poppycock
OP, you sure did go to some great lengths to debunk something that doesn't exist.
According to Sitchin, Nibiru (whose name was replaced with MARDUK in original legends by the Babylonian ruler of the same name in an attempt to co-opt the creation for himself, leading to some confusion among readers) collided catastrophically with Tiamat (a goddess in the Babylonian creation myth the Enûma Eliš), which he considers to be another planet once located between Mars and Jupiter. This collision supposedly formed the planet Earth, the asteroid belt, and the comets. Sitchin states that when struck by one of planet Nibiru's moons, Tiamat split in two, and then on a second pass Nibiru itself struck the broken fragments and one half of Tiamat became the asteroid belt. The second half, struck again by one of Nibiru's moons, was pushed into a new orbit and became today's planet Earth.
Originally posted by spacejosh
sorry you didn't prove anything to me you can believe all the"mainstream facts" you want people have been discrediting dr s a long time he interpreted what he read maybe you got some words wrong
When Sitchin wrote his books, only specialists could read the Sumerian language. However, sources such as the 2006 book Sumerian Lexicon[19] have made the language more accessible to non-experts. Ancient language scholar Michael S. Heiser[20] states he has found many inaccuracies in Sitchin's translations and challenges interested parties to use this book to check their validity.[15][21] Prof. Ronald H. Fritze,[22] author of the book Invented Knowledge: False History, Fake Science and Pseudo-religions,[22] mentions the example of Sitchin's claim that the Sumerian sign Din-Gir means "pure ones of the blazing rockets", adding that "Sitchin's assignment of meanings to ancient words is tendentious and frequently strained."[23] Fritze also commented on Sitchin's methodology, writing that "When critics have checked Sitchin's references, they have found that he frequently quotes out of context or truncates his quotes in a way that distorts evidence in order to prove his contentions. Evidence is presented selectively and contradictory evidence is ignored."[23]
Originally posted by ngchunter
Actually, because I'm not only a "believer" in science, but quite experienced at scientific investigation, I would have much more than just a "clue" if you were to tell me the orbital elements of "your planet." So let's hear them, what are they?
Originally posted by LoveandLightandRainbows
Originally posted by ngchunter
Actually, because I'm not only a "believer" in science, but quite experienced at scientific investigation, I would have much more than just a "clue" if you were to tell me the orbital elements of "your planet." So let's hear them, what are they?
As I said, Love, Light and Sound are the fabric of our soul. Until you learn these, nothing will I allow ro become known to you.
Namaste, LoveandLightandRainbows
Originally posted by eriktheawful
I know it's not me that you want to hear from, but as to the whole story about making the human race to have slaves to mine gold for them......
The whole thing reminds me of some "B" rated old Scifi movie. I remember the first book of his that I read, I was dumb founded thinking that someone in the library was having fun by putting a fiction book in the non-fiction area.
But again, this is just my personal opinion.
As I said, Love, Light and Sound are the fabric of our soul.
We know in our hearts that we must strive to use humor with reverence, and to be compassionate to others, even when we disagree with them.
I LIVE thre. I need no "astronomers" with your squinty eyed monoscopic views.
Deal with my denial of you.
Time, young, immatured Human to grow into your slippery skin.
Begone. I need you not.
Until you learn these, nothing will I allow ro become known to you.
Originally posted by poppycock
OP, you sure did go to some great lengths to debunk something that doesn't exist.
Seems suspicious to me that if there was no Niburu it would not be necessary to spend so much time debunking it.
Reminds me of all the full-timers working on 911 trying to uphold the miserably flawed OS.
Sigh...
Originally posted by ngchunter
Originally posted by chrisb9
reply to post by AndyMayhew
.
He had a valid criticism, care to address it? And you're dead wrong. If there were REAL photos of "Nibiru" and REAL coordinates that actually let other astronomers like me find it, then I'd believe it. But it's all nonsense, and your photo only reinforces that point.
As I said, Love, Light and Sound are the fabric of our soul.
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
Isn't that the truth! I'm so very thankful that you've taken the time to join us here and share with us your overflowing love and light. I have to admit, this outpouring touched me, We know in our hearts that we must strive to use humor with reverence, and to be compassionate to others, even when we disagree with them.
Originally posted by DenyObfuscationIndeed the light of this love is nearly blinding. What's your frequency? It appears to be very HIGH.
Originally posted by DenyObfuscationYou say you live there. Could I trouble you for the name of the wireless router you're using? Seems to have much better range than anything I can find here. TIA. Or if I misunderstood your location, I'd be fascinated to learn how you arrived here from there. Did you fly your own craft here? Pics would be so awesome. I haven't seen a "UFO" in over 30 years.
Yes, I am of the Other, Higher Frequencies
Originally posted by chrisb9
1.) That is "not my photo" That photo is an actual photo from the Neumayer Station 3 Webcam in Antartica. Here is the link to that webcam, you can visit that webcam yourself. It does not show up every day, as some days are cloudy etc. and what ever the exact alignment of the unknown object is. ----> .
Yes, I am of the Other, Higher Frequencies