It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by CaptGizmo
Ok now that's out of the way..Watch the insurance fraud and rates sky rocket now. Mark my words insurance fraud is going to be the next big crime wave to hit this country. Not to mention the insurance companies will raise the rates. It is all orchestrated. You didn't think the disgusting corruption of the health industry was going to stop did you....no it is going to get much worse ...watch.
Originally posted by jjf3rd77
Originally posted by haarvik
reply to post by Alxandro
Down 160 points as of right now.
Let's see how low it can go!
Yes. See Obama. Businesses do not want this!!! Almost every stock I watch is down. 146 points now. It's only mid day.
Originally posted by underduck
I think some of you guys are missing the point. This is a HUGE human rights victory. Giving everyone right to health care is far more important than any petty squabbles we have with the current or past administrations.
Georgia Gov. Nathan Deal says President Barack Obama's health care overhaul
is the largest tax increase in the U.S. history.www.independentmail.com...
Originally posted by burntheships
When is a tax not a tax???
The largest tax increase in U.S. History!
Georgia Gov. Nathan Deal says President Barack Obama's health care overhaul
is the largest tax increase in the U.S. history.www.independentmail.com...
1. Revenue Act of 1942: 5.04 percent of GDP;
2. Revenue Act of 1961: 2.2 percent of GDP;
3. Current Tax Payment Act of 1943: 1.13 percent of GDP;
4. Revenue and Expenditure Control Act of 1968: 1.09 percent of GDP;
5. Excess Profits Tax of 1950: .97 percent of GDP;
And here are the top five tax increases from the "modern" era of 1968-2006:
1. Revenue and Expenditure Control Act of 1968: 1.09 percent of GDP;
2. Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982: .8 percent of GDP;
3(t): Crude Oil Windfall Profit Tax Act of 1980: .5 percent of GDP
3(t): Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993; .5 percent of GDP;
5: Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990; .49 percent of GDP
But Roberts’ really brilliant move was to uphold the individual mandate under Congress’s taxing authority and explicitly to reject its constitutionality under the commerce clause. As Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg pointed out in her opinion, there was no reason for Roberts to rule on the commerce clause question, because a majority agreed that the act was a constitutional tax penalty.
Roberts did so regardless to create with the four conservative dissenters a majority view that a health insurance mandate violates the commerce clause. This result is in keeping with Roberts’ conservative view of restricting federal power and leaves him free to vote to strike down progressive federal legislation as unauthorized by the commerce clause. Moreover, by characterizing the individual mandate as a tax, Roberts hands Republicans a facile campaign cry that Obamacare Means New Taxes — and that Democrats are the party of taxation.
Finally, his decision allows Roberts to falsely paint himself as a neutral arbiter whose principled constitutional interpretations cannot be overridden by his politics. He implies that he thinks the law is a bad idea by adding a note at the end of his decision that the court expresses no opinion on its wisdom. If the court is not expressing an opinion, there would be no need to say so. But Roberts adds the line to underscore what a principled jurist he is voting that the law is constitutional even though he disapproves of it.
The reality, of course, is that Roberts has permitted the implementation of a conservative health-care regime, energized the Republican base, preserved his ability to vote against liberal congressional measures as violating the commerce clause and aggrandized himself as an apolitical Chief Justice. I tip my hat to his evil genius.
Originally posted by SyphonX
Originally posted by underduck
I think some of you guys are missing the point. This is a HUGE human rights victory. Giving everyone right to health care is far more important than any petty squabbles we have with the current or past administrations.
I'm confused.
You mind explaining to me how it's a "human rights" victory, if it's being forced as a tax on people.. and actually not given to you at all.
Basically, you are becoming a "forced customer" to the companies that everyone hates.
Human rights victory my ass, and I couldn't care less about partisanship.
Originally posted by jtap66
Single-payer, Medicaid for all.
Originally posted by marg6043
reply to post by burntheships
"The word tax can make many tax payers uneasy but add IRS as a enforcers and that will spark mass panic, pecially when use as a political tool this november"
Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by muzzleflash
And federal 'excise taxes'.
as in the ones on your phone bill, cable bill, etc.......
Originally posted by macman
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
Go back and read his statement released this morning.