From what I understand Zarqawi's ties to Al Qaeda are questionable as well.

Originally posted by spngsambigpants
From what I understand Zarqawi's ties to Al Qaeda are questionable as well.

That could stand to reason. Why follow bin Laden when you can become your own equally nasty bad guy on the world scene? Follow bin Laden and if and when different terrorist groups get together, you have to negotiate from his position instead of your own.

Originally posted by Banshee
"He was in contact from Baghdad with Ansar al-Islam in the northeastern part of Iraq. He had a cell operating from Baghdad during that period, as well. So there are clearly ties between Iraq and -- between the regime, Saddam Hussein's regime and al Qaeda," McClellan told reporters.

Interesting that McClellan gave himself the opportunity to only make the connection between Iraq and Zarqawi, yet still chose to attempt to draw the connection between the Hussein regime and Zarqawi. He even corrects himself away from the general connection toward the direct one. Of course, if it is determined that this connection does not exist, the retraction will be quiet and out of the mainstream so the vast majority of American's will never hear differently. These guys are great at that.

.
I suppose this means we are supposed to take the Administration's assertions on 'faith'.

Thank Goodness I am not a believer.
.

The CIA has a lot of amends to make.

my view is 'they' were inept since after the 1st WTC bombing of 1993

The CIA will have to string together a series of correct analysis coups to regain my favorable nod. until then, the Agency is suspect of SLACKING