It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Skyfloating
The article says the circumcised child was 4-years old. That appears to be a few steps harder than circumcising a newborn child. Maybe there should be an age-limit. Just an observation.
Circumcision might have various health benefits, including: Easier hygiene. Circumcision makes it simpler to wash the penis. Washing beneath the foreskin of an uncircumcised penis is generally easy, however. Decreased risk of urinary tract infections. The overall risk of urinary tract infections in males is low, but these infections might be more common in uncircumcised males. Severe infections early in life can lead to kidney problems later on. Prevention of penile problems. Occasionally, the foreskin on an uncircumcised penis can be difficult or impossible to retract (phimosis). This can lead to inflammation of the foreskin or head of the penis. Decreased risk of penile cancer. Although cancer of the penis is rare, it's less common in circumcised men. In addition, cervical cancer is less common in the female sexual partners of circumcised men. Decreased risk of sexually transmitted infections. Circumcised men might have a lower risk of certain sexually transmitted infections, including HIV. Still, safe sexual practices remain essential.
Originally posted by brukernavn
Out of those whom find circumcision wrong, inhumane, and abusive, I wonder how many of those same individuals are against abortion. Would be interesting to know.
Originally posted by Vardoger
Originally posted by brukernavn
Out of those whom find circumcision wrong, inhumane, and abusive, I wonder how many of those same individuals are against abortion. Would be interesting to know.
What the ...... does that have to do with this? It's not even related!
Good job Germany, hopefully this spreads.
Originally posted by brukernavn
Out of those whom find circumcision wrong, inhumane, and abusive, I wonder how many of those same individuals are against abortion. Would be interesting to know.
Originally posted by WorkingClassMan
Originally posted by brukernavn
Out of those whom find circumcision wrong, inhumane, and abusive, I wonder how many of those same individuals are against abortion. Would be interesting to know.
Can't see how the 2 have anything to do with each other but I have no issue with abortion and big problems with this if that helps.
I'll keep my skivvy thanks, Ban the archaic practice everywhere, performing cosmetic surgery on a baby for no good reason is barbaric and if it was not for religion "AGAIN" it would have been baned years ago.
If people are going to post about some supposed benefits many of which have alternatives like condoms and basic hygiene perhaps someone could post up stats on the Negatives like baby deaths or erectile problems for comparison.
If I got to puberty & found out Mr winkle didn't work dear lord I would show the snipers how a penis is removed.
As a non Muslim/Jew/? What is the exact purpose of this is it for ID purposes at the pearly gates or during the next war (like the Germans did). I thought all Abrahamic religions forbid mutilating marking the body in any way.edit on 28-6-2012 by WorkingClassMan because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by WorkingClassMan
Originally posted by brukernavn
Out of those whom find circumcision wrong, inhumane, and abusive, I wonder how many of those same individuals are against abortion. Would be interesting to know.
Can't see how the 2 have anything to do with each other but I have no issue with abortion and big problems with this if that helps.
I'll keep my skivvy thanks, Ban the archaic practice everywhere, performing cosmetic surgery on a baby for no good reason is barbaric and if it was not for religion "AGAIN" it would have been baned years ago.
If people are going to post about some supposed benefits many of which have alternatives like condoms and basic hygiene perhaps someone could post up stats on the Negatives like baby deaths or erectile problems for comparison.
If I got to puberty & found out Mr winkle didn't work dear lord I would show the snipers how a penis is removed.
As a non Muslim/Jew/? What is the exact purpose of this is it for ID purposes at the pearly gates or during the next war (like the Germans did). I thought all Abrahamic religions forbid mutilating marking the body in any way.edit on 28-6-2012 by WorkingClassMan because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by WorkingClassMan
Originally posted by brukernavn
Out of those whom find circumcision wrong, inhumane, and abusive, I wonder how many of those same individuals are against abortion. Would be interesting to know.
Can't see how the 2 have anything to do with each other but I have no issue with abortion and big problems with this if that helps.
I'll keep my skivvy thanks, Ban the archaic practice everywhere, performing cosmetic surgery on a baby for no good reason is barbaric and if it was not for religion "AGAIN" it would have been baned years ago.
If people are going to post about some supposed benefits many of which have alternatives like condoms and basic hygiene perhaps someone could post up stats on the Negatives like baby deaths or erectile problems for comparison.
If I got to puberty & found out Mr winkle didn't work dear lord I would show the snipers how a penis is removed.
As a non Muslim/Jew/? What is the exact purpose of this is it for ID purposes at the pearly gates or during the next war (like the Germans did). I thought all Abrahamic religions forbid mutilating marking the body in any way.edit on 28-6-2012 by WorkingClassMan because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by brukernavn
Out of those whom find circumcision wrong, inhumane, and abusive, I wonder how many of those same individuals are against abortion. Would be interesting to know.
Originally posted by eriktheawful
My late father was circumcised. His brother was circumcised. Both my grandfathers were circumcised.
All my male cousins were circumcised.
None of us are Jewish, and none of us had it done due to religious beliefs.
Back when I was born in the early 60's, it was a common belief that boys should be circumcised, and even promoted by the child care doctors back then.
It was still that way when I had my kids.
I understand that now it's not felt that way or even promoted by doctors anymore.
I don't feel mutilated. I just asked one of my sons if he felt mutilated and he looked at me like I had 2 heads.
It has never once interfered with my sex life (good lord no, hehehehe).
So while I understand many of you feel very deeply about this, please do not think of me as having been "mutilated". I don't feel that way.
As a mater of fact, I'm glad I don't have this extra piece of flabby skin in the way when I go to take a wiz or when I shower.
But that's just how I feel. I would never force anyone to have their child circumcised.
So for thousands of years, people have been having their sons circumcised. And for those thousands of years it was okay.
But now, anyone who was circumcised has been "mutilated", their parents are now "child abusers" (even though for how long doctors promoted this regardless of you religious preference or beliefs? Source), and now it's "Go Nanny State Government!" suddenly?
I would think you all would be a bit more concerned about things like:
10 year old girls who are only 32 pounds, that are locked in closets.
Children who are beaten to death, drowned, burned, etc.
What are the benefits of circumcision? There is some evidence that circumcision has health benefits, including: A decreased risk of urinary tract infections. A reduced risk of sexually transmitted diseases in men. Protection against penile cancer and a reduced risk of cervical cancer in female sex partners. Prevention of balanitis (inflammation of the glans) and balanoposthitis (inflammation of the glans and foreskin). Prevention of phimosis (the inability to retract the foreskin) and paraphimosis (the inability to return the foreskin to its original location). Circumcision also makes it easier to keep the end of the penis clean. Note: Some studies show that good hygiene can help prevent certain problems with the penis, including infections and swelling, even if the penis is not circumcised. In addition, using a condom during sex will help prevent STDs and other infections. What are the risks of circumcision? Like any surgical procedure, there are risks associated with circumcision. However, this risk is low. Problems associated with circumcision include: Pain Risk of bleeding and infection at the site of the circumcision Irritation of the glans Increased risk of meatitis (inflammation of the opening of the penis) Risk of injury to the penis
Originally posted by brukernavn
Originally posted by WorkingClassMan
Originally posted by brukernavn
Out of those whom find circumcision wrong, inhumane, and abusive, I wonder how many of those same individuals are against abortion. Would be interesting to know.
Can't see how the 2 have anything to do with each other but I have no issue with abortion and big problems with this if that helps.
I'll keep my skivvy thanks, Ban the archaic practice everywhere, performing cosmetic surgery on a baby for no good reason is barbaric and if it was not for religion "AGAIN" it would have been baned years ago.
If people are going to post about some supposed benefits many of which have alternatives like condoms and basic hygiene perhaps someone could post up stats on the Negatives like baby deaths or erectile problems for comparison.
If I got to puberty & found out Mr winkle didn't work dear lord I would show the snipers how a penis is removed.
As a non Muslim/Jew/? What is the exact purpose of this is it for ID purposes at the pearly gates or during the next war (like the Germans did). I thought all Abrahamic religions forbid mutilating marking the body in any way.edit on 28-6-2012 by WorkingClassMan because: (no reason given)
Oh, so it is not ok to perform a minor surgical operation on an infants genitals, but it is entirely ok, ethical, and moral to shove a pair of scissors into its brain, suck out the brains with a vacuum and remove the living human being from the uterus before birth. Thanks for your clarification. You are correct. Circumcision is MUCH more barbaric than slaughtering an unborn human.edit on 6/28/2012 by brukernavn because: Jævla quotes
Originally posted by Xaphan
I usually refrain from posting controversial articles such as this, but this one is an exception. I for one am glad to see this. Circumcising a child should be considered mutilation. A baby isn't old enough to make the decision as to whether he wants a piece of his penis clipped off or not.
Originally posted by brukernavn
Originally posted by WorkingClassMan
Originally posted by brukernavn
Out of those whom find circumcision wrong, inhumane, and abusive, I wonder how many of those same individuals are against abortion. Would be interesting to know.
Can't see how the 2 have anything to do with each other but I have no issue with abortion and big problems with this if that helps.
I'll keep my skivvy thanks, Ban the archaic practice everywhere, performing cosmetic surgery on a baby for no good reason is barbaric and if it was not for religion "AGAIN" it would have been baned years ago.
If people are going to post about some supposed benefits many of which have alternatives like condoms and basic hygiene perhaps someone could post up stats on the Negatives like baby deaths or erectile problems for comparison.
If I got to puberty & found out Mr winkle didn't work dear lord I would show the snipers how a penis is removed.
As a non Muslim/Jew/? What is the exact purpose of this is it for ID purposes at the pearly gates or during the next war (like the Germans did). I thought all Abrahamic religions forbid mutilating marking the body in any way.edit on 28-6-2012 by WorkingClassMan because: (no reason given)
Aside from where it says to not mark the body in remembrance of the dead, can you back up what you have said? I would like to see where it says such. Truly. Ha det bra.
Originally posted by JohnPhoenix
Originally posted by Xaphan
I usually refrain from posting controversial articles such as this, but this one is an exception. I for one am glad to see this. Circumcising a child should be considered mutilation. A baby isn't old enough to make the decision as to whether he wants a piece of his penis clipped off or not.
Are you Insane?
I'm Not Jewish or Muslim but I was circumcised as a child for health reasons. Back in '68 doctors were doing this routinely for health and sanitary reasons. It was recommended to parents for these reasons. It is still being done today for these reasons.
I guess German doctors just aren't too good with health issues. By German doctors not being able to perform this for health reasons they endanger the child's life. The risk may be small but has great potential to grow into a huge problem.edit on 28-6-2012 by JohnPhoenix because: sp