New site tells what you -- and everyone else -- is doing - Scary Stuff

page: 6
46
<< 3  4  5    7 >>

log in

join

posted on Jun, 28 2012 @ 07:23 PM
link   
i don't think people quite get what this site is doing.
they aren't playing big brother, they are pointing out to people to stop posting stupid crap on facebook because ,anyone can find it if they want to
they are really saying "Stop being an idiot! stop posting stuff that makes you look like an idiot, you are making the IQ level of the planet go down!"

i thought the idea was pretty darn clear from the text "we know what you;re doing... and we think you should stop"

i guess they needed to be clearer with "your facebook posts are embarrassing please stop posting on facebook or the internet, no one wants to read your stupidity."
edit on 28-6-2012 by demongoat because: (no reason given)
edit on 28-6-2012 by demongoat because: (no reason given)




posted on Jun, 28 2012 @ 08:14 PM
link   
The Whos doing drugs has the Least number of posts in it

where as the Whos hungover has the most post in it.

Kinda tells you something.



posted on Jun, 28 2012 @ 09:15 PM
link   
What is the difference between doing drugs and being hungover?



posted on Jun, 28 2012 @ 09:34 PM
link   
OMG!!!!!!
Stuff that people post publicly online...

...is being posted for the public...
...online!!!!

Wait, what am I upset about again?



posted on Jun, 29 2012 @ 07:39 AM
link   
reply to post by habitforming
 



Wait, what am I upset about again?

Conservatives.
As I recall.



posted on Jun, 29 2012 @ 07:47 AM
link   
Everyone on Facebook either:

A: Drinks all the time.

or

B: Aspartame, what's that?

That is all.



posted on Jun, 29 2012 @ 09:37 AM
link   

Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by habitforming
 



Wait, what am I upset about again?

Conservatives.
As I recall.


I don't get upset about conservatives, at all. 25% of the time they say things which make me think, and which I'll consider intelligent, and the other 75% they make me laugh; so they tend to be good value either way.



posted on Jun, 29 2012 @ 12:26 PM
link   
reply to post by petrus4
 



That is a good way to look at things petrus4!



posted on Jun, 29 2012 @ 05:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by jeantherapy
What is the difference between doing drugs and being hungover?


A few hours of time?



posted on Jun, 29 2012 @ 05:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by doom27
i always like how people are all "OMG NO USE FACEBOOK PRIVACY!!!"

I have one and guess what, fake name, fake birthday, fake addresses/schools, fake pictures. Its for the dumbasses who want to talk on facebook and only that. Why don't you just encourage to use false info instead?


I don't use the site but I have seen a few "accounts". I guess my question to you is what's in it for you? If you aren't using it as intended what else is on there that is worth signing up for? Games or something? Serious question btw. As I said I know enough about the site to know I personally will never use it and that's it.



posted on Jun, 29 2012 @ 05:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by habitforming
 



Wait, what am I upset about again?

Conservatives.
As I recall.


I do not know any conservatives. What does that have to do with this thread?



posted on Jun, 29 2012 @ 06:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by habitforming

Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by habitforming
 



Wait, what am I upset about again?

Conservatives.
As I recall.


I do not know any conservatives. What does that have to do with this thread?
You asked a wide open question, I provided a possible answer.
You say the answer is incorrect, that's good enough for me.



posted on Jun, 29 2012 @ 06:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by butcherguy
You asked a wide open question, I provided a possible answer.

No I did not. I posted a response in this particular thread and my question was obviously in that context before you snipped it. So you had to go out of your way to give me a stupid off topic answer.

You say the answer is incorrect, that's good enough for me.

I do not even know what you are talking about.
Do you know what the topic of this thread is?
Do you know who I asked that question to?
Do you know what it pertained to?



posted on Jun, 29 2012 @ 06:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by habitforming

Originally posted by butcherguy
You asked a wide open question, I provided a possible answer.

No I did not. I posted a response in this particular thread and my question was obviously in that context before you snipped it. So you had to go out of your way to give me a stupid off topic answer.

You say the answer is incorrect, that's good enough for me.

I do not even know what you are talking about.
Do you know what the topic of this thread is?
Do you know who I asked that question to?
Do you know what it pertained to?
Are you okay? Don't want you to have an apoplexy or anything.

I read the thread before you posted. I read the title first, so yes I'm aware of the topic.
I have to guess that you asked the question of the OP, as you did not hit the reply button to place that post.
Fact is you belittled the OP by implying that his thread is silly for making a point of the problems associated with 'sharing' of information by social networks.
With that post of yours, you made the point that there was very little point to the thread. By doing so, you made your question very wide open. You read your own post, right? Or did the guy on the shift before you write it?



posted on Jun, 29 2012 @ 07:04 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jun, 29 2012 @ 07:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by butcherguy
Are you okay? Don't want you to have an apoplexy or anything.


Really? Because I asked you four questions? School must have been hell for you, constantly worrying about each teacher that had more than 3 questions for you.


I read the thread before you posted. I read the title first, so yes I'm aware of the topic.


So what does your reply about conservatives have to do with the thread or my post?


I have to guess that you asked the question of the OP, as you did not hit the reply button to place that post.


You do not have to guess. I did indeed hit the reply button.
How about you tell me what other button you think I hit?
I replied directly to the OP, not you.


Fact is you belittled the OP by implying that his thread is silly for making a point of the problems associated with 'sharing' of information by social networks.

You opinions are not facts.
How about you tell me what is serious about a website that posts information people already posted online themselves?


With that post of yours, you made the point that there was very little point to the thread.


That is how I feel. I am sorry if I accidentally expressed myself.


By doing so, you made your question very wide open.


How does that hold up to any logic?
I replied to one person and asked them a question. That question was part of a larger post in this thread. You have to be a complete moron to think I was asking about anything other than the topic.


You read your own post, right? Or did the guy on the shift before you write it?


You think people get paid to post in threads like this?
Running short on tinfoil?



posted on Jun, 29 2012 @ 07:47 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jun, 29 2012 @ 07:52 PM
link   
reply to post by habitforming
 




You do not have to guess. I did indeed hit the reply button. How about you tell me what other button you think I hit? I replied directly to the OP, not you.

Sorry, I wasn't clear enough. You did not hit 'reply' on a particular post. You hit the post reply button, which is quite generic. Look up. See how I replied to you? It says so on the post! If you had replied 'directly' to the OP, it would say that above your post. Go back and look at your first post. Who was it to?



posted on Jun, 29 2012 @ 07:55 PM
link   
reply to post by habitforming
 



I replied to one person and asked them a question. That question was part of a larger post in this thread. You have to be a complete moron to think I was asking about anything other than the topic.
You can certainly follow the logic, and if you are resorting to calling me a moron, that shows how weak your argument is. Go back and read it again if you didn't have time to digest it.



posted on Jun, 29 2012 @ 07:58 PM
link   
reply to post by habitforming
 





Really? Because I asked you four questions? School must have been hell for you, constantly worrying about each teacher that had more than 3 questions for you.
You seemed to be a bit troubled and I was genuinely worried.

The teacher thing wasn't funny, I gave one a stroke in 7th grade.





top topics
 
46
<< 3  4  5    7 >>

log in

join