Originally posted by conwaylemmon
How do you know to which legitimate questions I was referring? I mentioned no gov't disinformation, planted aircraft wreckage, or fake eyewitnesses.
I'm not going to give specific examples, because you won't consider them, although you will claim that you have considered them, and proven them
I have no idea what "legitimate questions" you were referring to. That's why I was asking what these "legitimate questions" were that you
claimed to have. The point is that unless you've discovered something new that hasn't been seen in the last ten years, odds are there is a
legitimate answer to your legitimate question. The problem is that time and time again, the truthers refuse to accept the answers as being
legitimate. It would be one thing if they could offer a logical reason, but by and large it's entirely becuase they accuse it of "being planted by
sinister secret agents" which is simply an exercise in pitiful excuse making for why they shouldn't believe what others tell them.
If you can show something to the contrary that you won't fall back upon the "it''s been planted by sinister secret agents" excuse, by all means,
please post it.
I'm forming my theories based on many sources, yes. I believe that I have the ability to form logical, reasoned conclusions based on the information
that I have seen. and I trust my own judgement. Either way I'm being conned. You're theory could be the correct theory, and if it is, I'm being
conned by the loony conspiracy websites and a lot of well meaning scientists. If your theory is incorrect, and mine is at least partially correct, I
am being conned by my government. Hmm...Who has conned me before?
If you're going to go that route then you need to ask yourself, who has historically hijacked passenger aircraft for political/religious agendas,
murdered innocent civilians for what we in the west would consider frivolous reasons to the poiut of being surreal, and have thrown their own lives
away in suicide attacks against their perceived enemies. That Is what the 9/11 attack was, after all. Islamic fundamentalists can't NOT be on the
top of the list of suspects...particularly when we see they're not being particularly repentent about their blind devotion to theology even after the
attack. Who was it that rioted over cartoons of Mohammed in Danish newspapers, again?
Theories have nothing to do with it; it's what the evidence actually shows, and there's an enormous amount of evidence showing it was in fact a
legitimate terrorist attack and preciously scant evidence showing it was a staged event...and the ones providing the preciously scant evidence, like
Gage, Jones, and Avery, have been caught red handed at presenting false evidence in the past. I will givve you all the evidence of that as you would
you try to get the police to investigate. You tell all of your family and friends you go on internet forums that might relate. Most say
"doctors don't poison children". It comes out on the news that some loony is accusing doctors of killing babies. The Discovery Health channel has
a show on how doctors pledge the hippocratic oath and can't possibly kill. I could go on. but I would like to ask you to sincerely answer this: Would
you demand that her body be exhumed for further investigation
Yes I would, absolutely...but then your analogy doesn't apply here because the hospital attendent informing me of the impropriety is by definition a
whistleblower, and a whistleblower is by definition someone willing to come forward and offer evidence. I dont need to tell you that despite the ever
growing pool of people accused of being involved in this conspiracy and/or coverup, not a single whistleblower came forward exposing this to be a
staged event. No timetables, no documents, no tangible lists of conspirators, not even a prostitute coming forward revealing a customer told her how
the explosives were smuggled into the buildings. ZERO. Using your own analogy, all we have in this case is some guy calling me up telling me
"everything I know about my daughter's death is wrong and he'll tell me the REAL truth if I give him my money". I look into his credentials and
find out he doesn't even work at the hospital- he flips burgers for a living and has no connection to the hospital whatsoever. In that case, what
would YOU do- believe everything he says completely and without question, or brush him off as a self serving con artist trying to use your grief to
rip you off?
If you're going to theorize these alternative conspiracy stories, that's one thing, but at least use analogies that actually apply.