False flag method Olympics 2012 update.

page: 33
23
<< 30  31  32    34 >>

log in

join

posted on Aug, 12 2012 @ 06:34 AM
link   

Originally posted by stumason
Why is this now a discussion about the legal system?


Try keep up mate.


the nonsense you and Harry come out with...


Ad hominems are poor show.




posted on Aug, 12 2012 @ 06:46 AM
link   

Originally posted by Wifibrains
Ok, it turned out dud, but it was not based on nothing.


Er, it was. You're opening post contained nothing but conjecture, coupled with an image or two pinched from the Daily Mail or Flikr and a huge dash of fanciful imagination.


Originally posted by Wifibrains
Did I add the poster? Did I do the numerology? Get your facts staight buddy. yes I did get off my arse....read the op..


No, you didn't, but your cohorts did and I am well within my rights to address them. Got off your arse? You went to the beach, saw a wreck from WW2 and have, somehow, come to the conclusion it is some sort of blackmail device to ensure the UK's co-operation with the NWO. Despite the fact if it was any danger to anyone, it would have been removed long ago..


Originally posted by Wifibrains
You never, you sent an email. Lol.


Oh, I did. Ask him, go on. Send him a mail yourself and ask him. If you were paying attention, you'd know who to contact.


Originally posted by Wifibrains
What others reasearch went into the op?


God, your English sucks.

Having been distracted by the plethora of dog crap in this thread, it would appear that no, there is no other research in your OP, that much is true. On review, it seems your OP is just conjecture and fanciful BS you made up instead, so apologies, you're making your own crap up not repeating someone else



Originally posted by Wifibrains
This pile of steaming dog mess is because you are here making it stink. So go away.


Awww... Again, upset with a dissenting opinion. Grow up, child.


Originally posted by Wifibrains
The three silly possibilities you post don't compare, though the first one is proberly true for you. Pussy.


Of course they compare, they are based on as much evidence as your OP! Face it, you're talking bollocks and are now desperately back peddling because, here we are at the end of the Olympics and there hasn't even been so much as a punch up!


reply to post by harryhaller
 


It's called a rhetorical question. Point being, this is not the place to go into a discussion about the English legal system. And it is nonsense! If you don't think it is, feel free to start a thread and I will gladly take you to task over it, but that discussion is not for here in this thread.



posted on Aug, 12 2012 @ 06:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by stumason

a discussion about the English legal system. And it is nonsense!


I agree entirely, no need for debate



posted on Aug, 12 2012 @ 07:02 AM
link   
Sending an email is not getting off your arse. So you stop talking bollocks.

The poem was what made me think some kind of warning was being given.

What was made up? What?

I'm not back peddeling at all, you had your facts wrong, telling you to check them is not back peddeling.

You clearly want an arguement. You clearly want to ridicule, you are clearly rude. And you tell me to grow up...child. How old are you.


I'll give you an arguement if you want. Come meet me. Don't hide behind your sheild.
edit on 12-8-2012 by Wifibrains because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 12 2012 @ 07:03 AM
link   
You know, if I was a terrorist or a member of the elite masturbating in front of a mirror whilst reclining on a bed of £50 notes, I'm not sure what I'd have to gain from bombing the Olympics.

Yes, I can buy into symbolism, magickal acts and the like (part of my academic background is semiotics rather than 'skepticism') but there's a problem with this. Anyone can read anything into anything. Yes, with research you can be informed and be aware of things that other people won't be or recognise a symbol that others won't (or rather recognise a specific interpretation of something), but you're also more likely to looking for things that might not be there in the first place. What's the Mark Twain quote about hammers and nails?

The problem with magickal acts is that you can make practically anything 'magickal'. In it's simplest of terms, just create a sigil and charge it. There's no mystery to it. The crappy Wenlock and Mandeville mascots, the Union Flag, the #ty 2012 logo: they could all be sigils being charged with the emotions of the masses. But then again, so could tube maps, coca-cola logos and water marked logo on internet porn could also be magickal in exactly the same way. My avatar at ATS could similarly be one. The stuff I've posted in the past that has really pissed-off various ATS demographics could be charging my little artwork with anger and frustration &c.

An elite or PTB doesn't needan opportunity like the Olympics to create and use symbolism. They own everything and everyone. It's not like they needa special occasion to do it. Let's be honest, the world situation was pretty much buggered back in 2008. There's very few people on here that believe whatever is happening in the world right now is a new thing that suddenly needs addressing in some way. People here believe it's aliens in early history, that it's all the fault of the British hundreds of years ago, or some purposely evil intent in the founding of America and so on. Why now? Why not the last Olympics? Why not the last American one (after all, America is the centre of the universe, right?)

An elite can build their symbolism anywhere they want and have probably done so. If it does exist, then it's in everything, everywhere and it always has been - not just some over-hyped sports day for rich people. Also, any elite actually probably like London and all that symbolism, the in-jokes in the architecture, the careful zoo-management of millions of people in London over the last however many years would be frightful waste. The rich and the powerful love tradition and history, more so when it's a kind of 'status' to show who they are and what they own. Ruining a London they own in a far more tangible way than the people living in it doesn't really make sense (even accounting for magickal acts and the like). Why destroy their own wealth and the people/insects they need to create even more wealth for them?

Also, if it's not an elite, and not just 'run of the mill' terrorists, if I was a terrorist I'm not sure why I'd bother with the Olympics at all. Obviously, I'm not saying I am a terrorist, although if I was a terrorist I'd probably say I wasn't a terrorist because that's the kind of thing a terrorist would say so people wouldn't think he was a terrorist*. Bombing the Olympics is counter-productive and unnecessary. Yes, I appreciate the need for 'statements' but you can create a pretty big statement far, far away from the watchful eyes focusing on the Olympics. Home grown British terrorists like the IRA* didn't just go for the bigger prize of London: some of the most shocking and 'symbolic' bombings were in places like Manchester and Birmingham. They even went for 'gold' in Brighton rather than in London.

Whilst all the extra police and army are in London, it means there are no longer elsewhere: massive holes in security in many British towns and cities at the moment. London's actually quieter than it usually is during the summer at the moment (tourism is up in Paris and Berlin too), which means lots of people in other places.

*for all Stewart Lee fans



posted on Aug, 12 2012 @ 07:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by Wifibrains
Sending an email is not getting off your arse. So you stop talking bollocks.


Actually making the effort to locate the person responsible is a damned site more than you or anyone else did!


Originally posted by Wifibrains
What was made up? What?


The bulk of you OP for starters. It was a fantasy you came up with.


Originally posted by Wifibrains
I'm not back peddeling at all, you had your facts wrong, telling you to check them is not back peddeling.


Pray tell, what facts did I have wrong? The fact it wasn't you you mentioned numbers or posters is neither here or there, the fact is they were referenced in this thread as evidence of something being "up". Clearly, this was bollocks. And for Christ's sake, try to be consistent with your spelling errors at least. You spell the same word differently in the same sentence.


Originally posted by Wifibrains
You clearly want an arguement. You clearly want to ridicule, you are clearly rude. And you tell me to grow up...child. How old are you.



Nope, I want the truth, not pages of garbage cluttering the website. Back in the day, ATS prided itself on it's content. Nowadays, any old crap seems to be able to fly... I am 30, not that it matters. If you're older, that is shameful on your part, matey.


Originally posted by Wifibrains
I'll give you an arguement if you want. Come meet me. Don't hide behind your sheild.
edit on 12-8-2012 by Wifibrains because: (no reason given)


I'm in Bracknell, right now, but if it takes you a while to get here, come to Wokingham after 1800hrs today. I'd be happy to meet you



posted on Aug, 12 2012 @ 07:46 AM
link   
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.



posted on Aug, 12 2012 @ 07:59 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Aug, 12 2012 @ 08:02 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Aug, 12 2012 @ 08:05 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Aug, 12 2012 @ 08:15 AM
link   
EDIT: Upon reflection, I am going to withdraw from this childishness..
edit on 12/8/12 by stumason because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 12 2012 @ 08:17 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Aug, 12 2012 @ 08:22 AM
link   

Originally posted by stumason
EDIT: Upon reflection, I am going to withdraw from this childishness..
edit on 12/8/12 by stumason because: (no reason given)


Thank you, then so will I.



posted on Aug, 12 2012 @ 08:23 AM
link   
reply to post by Wifibrains
 


I don't use a pseudonym for my username, it IS my name. If you check out the links on my sig, I believe one of them goes to one of my FB pages, where you can find me. No anonymity from me, matey.

And you seem to equate "ridicule" with a solid argument against what you're saying. Not once have you managed to counter anything anyone has said in this thread with anything close to solid evidence.



posted on Aug, 12 2012 @ 09:21 AM
link   
reply to post by stumason
 


No one has brought any solid evidence to counter against. They have countered the evidence within the thread with speculation. Ok you found the artist of the poster, the posters have their own thread, did you post your findings there? I'm sure they would be appreciated there. Though do you really expect the guy to admit to you if there was anything sinister in it? Coarse not. So what you found means nothing. It could be as much as a lie as you believe this thread to be, but you take him for his word. I've not lied, made anything up or fantasised over this. And I don't care about the believers or non believers, believing.

We got off on the wrong foot twice now in the same thread now. I've only been rude in defence, even still... I'm sorry... And I'll go one further just for you, and say... " my theory was wrong" but please don't think I believed in the theory. That's not why I started this thread... To get people to believe. I wanted to raise awareness on the danger that was apparent to me. If it was dud, so what. I did what I felt was right, but others thought it was wrong. What would you do? Listen to your heart? That's what I did.

Stumason, I never saw your signature, and I must say, not many would do that, especially on ats. it definately lends weight to you having nothing to hide. Which shows honesty is part of your nature. Mine too. Honest. I don't lie, I don't like liers, and I detest deceit and deception. This is why I've been hostile towards you and others here in this thread. You are trying to make it seem like a planned out fantacey full of lies, for what gain? It would have been terrible had the theory come to pass, I'm happy it did not. But I'm not happy that I've stuck my neck on a block, when all I was trying to do was warn people. I'm not going to let it bother me that I was wrong. I've already accepted that. What bothers me is the way others are handling the way they are saying, "you was wrong"

Those three words are sufficient. Words of advice should follow... Not ridicule and claims of charlatans at work.

I have not written this out in an argumentative tone, so please don't come back with something rude or condescending. I'll not start another conspiracey thread ever. I don't have any more, lol. And dont want any. It's not what i do. It's not what I'm about. And the heat for getting it wrong, although if it was right could save lives, is just not worth it. Maybe for hardcore conspirators and ats members it's all in a days work and good fun, but to be on this end, it's not fun.

I just thought the warning was worth sharing, was I wrong? Yes...... But I still feel I did the right thing. No matter how bad you guys want to make me feel for doing so.
edit on 12-8-2012 by Wifibrains because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 12 2012 @ 10:54 AM
link   

Originally posted by Wifibrains
reply to post by stumason
 


No one has brought any solid evidence to counter against.


No-one has presented any real evidence in support of the numerous (often self contradictory) allegations of false flag, alien intervention, natural disaster predictions .......

Lets let time prove it once and for all.

If nothing happens it proves that ATSers have rumbled whatever was meant to happen and in doing so prevented it, saving the world for the 41st time this week ...... If London blows up tonight, I admit I was wrong - and there $100 to a charity of your choice. Fair?



posted on Aug, 12 2012 @ 11:03 AM
link   

Originally posted by AndyMayhew
$100 to a charity of your choice. Fair?


Dollars? Dude, give real money, not that pretend Mickey Mouse stuff


I'll chip in a ton (£100 to those not in the know) as well for charity, as well as volunteer for the clean up after said disaster.



posted on Aug, 12 2012 @ 11:22 AM
link   
If you can afford £100 for charity, give it to them. Don't try and make it sound better by saying its for charity when it's only your ego talking.

www.justgiving.com...

Here's a charity of my choice. Is your heart as big as your mouth? Why wait to bet on something bad happening?
edit on 12-8-2012 by Wifibrains because: (no reason given)
edit on 12-8-2012 by Wifibrains because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 12 2012 @ 03:03 PM
link   
well the olympics are almost over, hope we cam put all this foolishness behind us

of course now that ive said that, alien terrorists dressed as the nwo will show up and bring tea and death camps



posted on Aug, 12 2012 @ 03:33 PM
link   
Well I am watching the closing ceremony of the London Olympics.

This thread represents another silly prediction of disaster and death that never materialised. Has any prediction on ATS ever come to pass?

Thankfully, it was three weeks of really good sport and (as predicted) all was calm.

Regards





new topics
top topics
 
23
<< 30  31  32    34 >>

log in

join