Clashes at Republican Guards HQ near Damascus, reports of British forces in Syria

page: 7
41
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join

posted on Jun, 26 2012 @ 05:25 PM
link   
reply to post by Alternative4u
 


Maybe your contact should get another crystal ball because the one he's using seems a bit faulty at the moment. Russia isn't going to attack anyone and neither is China. The West keeps those countries alive with our investments - if we pulled out all our cash they'd be canabalising each other within a week.




posted on Jun, 26 2012 @ 05:41 PM
link   
reply to post by DevilJonah
 


Pretty misleading title! Unconfirmed troops mentioned what five times and that is only for spec ops troops. RT is full of pooh.



posted on Jun, 26 2012 @ 06:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by Gauss
About bleedin' time somebody does something.

Of course, with doing something also comes the responsibility of keeping the more fanatical rebel groups out of the new government. Sigh... I miss the Cold War. Things were much more simple back in those days.


WHAT this is how they are going to kill us all, and there was never a Cold War it was to keep you all in fear



posted on Jun, 26 2012 @ 06:53 PM
link   
Well there's not much on twitter except the same old regurgitated rubbish. Debka isn't exactly well known for being correct and it appears that's where PressTV and RT got their stories from


If British SF's weren't on the ground I'd be very surprised.
edit on 26/6/12 by Dark Vengeance because: typo



posted on Jun, 26 2012 @ 07:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by Hopeforeveryone
reply to post by Alternative4u
 


Maybe your contact should get another crystal ball because the one he's using seems a bit faulty at the moment. Russia isn't going to attack anyone and neither is China. The West keeps those countries alive with our investments - if we pulled out all our cash they'd be canabalising each other within a week.


LOL - what planet are you on?

Our investments to them? Pulled out all OUR cash?

Man, we owe them TRILLIONS for THEIR investment in US.

All we're giving them is bits of paper with IOU written on them.



posted on Jun, 26 2012 @ 07:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by Hopeforeveryone
reply to post by Alternative4u
 


Maybe your contact should get another crystal ball because the one he's using seems a bit faulty at the moment. Russia isn't going to attack anyone and neither is China. The West keeps those countries alive with our investments - if we pulled out all our cash they'd be canabalising each other within a week.


HA! Aha ha haha hahaha... Good one! You're joking, right? What parallel universe did you come from if you're not? You must have accidentally walked through a black hole or something.

Guess who the US owes money to? That's right.



posted on Jun, 26 2012 @ 07:53 PM
link   
reply to post by Power_Semi
 


Sure, look up the statistics for how much the Western countries have invested in China and Russia over the last 30 years and how much Russia and china have invested in the western economies, then get back to me on that one. The end of the cold war was down to economics, guess who won that one.

If we tank as a source for China's products - they're stuffed, they're totally dependant on the west and they know it.
edit on 26-6-2012 by Hopeforeveryone because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 26 2012 @ 07:54 PM
link   
reply to post by rigel4
 



With any luck our commandos will get into the presidential palace, find the criminal Bashar,
and execute him.

You make me sick.




posted on Jun, 26 2012 @ 08:03 PM
link   
How to get everyone used to the idea of war with Syria:

British Troops Invade Syria - Happening Now!



And the propaganda mill turns and turns...



posted on Jun, 26 2012 @ 08:05 PM
link   
reply to post by ThisIsNotReality
 


Us owes china about 1 trillion in government bonds, about the same as japan. Don't know how you guys managed to get 104% of your gdp in debt - outstanding, hasnt been that bad since ww2.



posted on Jun, 26 2012 @ 08:16 PM
link   



posted on Jun, 26 2012 @ 08:21 PM
link   
edit on 26-6-2012 by SLAYER69 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 26 2012 @ 08:31 PM
link   
Maybe all will chill out. What with our knowledge of past conflicts and the futility of escalation, maybe everyone will just posture and relax. Massive destruction maybe too much to contemplate or initiate Negotiations reign and we talk. Nah, probably not Killings like a cancer, out of control growth. Guns are blazing, People are dying in Syria, and likely soon in Turkey And from there everyone's in on it.However I'm thinking All Out is going to be difficult to achieve. Starts and stops, hot spots, cool spots.Big events followed by lack of events. China's winding down. Russia's got cash. And the United States is on the other side of the world, with basically farmland and water, and a small little, well armed partner in the area. Pay attention. History may require you to look back and wonder how it all happened. Notice how many maybes I got in here?



posted on Jun, 26 2012 @ 08:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by darkbake
reply to post by DevilJonah
 


China and Russia and Syria and Iran are planning on doing some war games this summer, so probably.

War games are a euphemism. They are planning a war. And so do their adversaries.
Japan and Switzerland are the open factors until August in the world scenario - in different ways.



posted on Jun, 26 2012 @ 09:03 PM
link   
Wow this thread is telling, post complete garbage and get 7 pages and 24 flags. That's embracing ignorance.



posted on Jun, 26 2012 @ 09:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by Power_Semi

Originally posted by Hopeforeveryone
reply to post by Alternative4u
 


Maybe your contact should get another crystal ball because the one he's using seems a bit faulty at the moment. Russia isn't going to attack anyone and neither is China. The West keeps those countries alive with our investments - if we pulled out all our cash they'd be canabalising each other within a week.


LOL - what planet are you on?

Our investments to them? Pulled out all OUR cash?

Man, we owe them TRILLIONS for THEIR investment in US.

All we're giving them is bits of paper with IOU written on them.



Originally posted by ThisIsNotReality

Originally posted by Hopeforeveryone
reply to post by Alternative4u
 


Maybe your contact should get another crystal ball because the one he's using seems a bit faulty at the moment. Russia isn't going to attack anyone and neither is China. The West keeps those countries alive with our investments - if we pulled out all our cash they'd be canabalising each other within a week.


HA! Aha ha haha hahaha... Good one! You're joking, right? What parallel universe did you come from if you're not? You must have accidentally walked through a black hole or something.

Guess who the US owes money to? That's right.


ATS member Hopeforeveryone is correct...


China is already the biggest foreign buyer of U.S. government debt with holdings of more than $1.1 trillion as early 2011. But U.S. statistics showed just $2.3 billion in Chinese direct investments in companies with operations in the United States at the end of 2009, the report said.

That is approximately 0.1 percent of the $2.3 trillion in total foreign direct investment, or FDI, in the United States.

China's share is less than many smaller countries such as Mexico, Saudi Arabia, South Korea, Brazil and India and dwarfed by the biggest foreign investors in the United States, such as Britain, Japan and Germany, the report said.

However, Chinese investment in the United States already is increasing, likely rising by more than $5 billion in 2010 and supporting more than 10,000 American jobs, the report said.

U.S. companies have about $50 billion invested in China, compared to the low level of Chinese investment here.



Report urges U.S. open door to China investment flood



posted on Jun, 26 2012 @ 09:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by Trajan
It is a fact they train harder than other nations because we have no conflicts with other nations.

That makes absolutely no sense. What would be the point of training so hard if you have no conflicts with other nations? The IRA is a joke.


10,500 Active and 9,800 Reserves isn't so bad if that is what you are getting at. We don't fight conventional warfare. We fight guerrilla warfare and only fight in static defences under UN missions.
your 10,500 troops opposed to 500,000 Army Soldiers (That's only Army.. don't forget Marines and both their reservists).. let me know how that works out for you. That's almost like the ratio of the Chinese Army against the U.S.

The Army isn't trained in "conventional warfare".. thanks to OEF and OIF the entire manual has changed. By the way, the U.S. Special Forces have taught countries to fight guerrilla warfare for years.. what makes the IRA better?

We have the most battle hardened force in the world, regardless of wars we've lost/won.


That said, if you want to nit pick about numbers then so be it. But just remember that the Irish Brigades take some of the lowest casualty rates in any EU Battlegroups. :-)
I guess we're just supposed to take your word for it right?


You clearly had no idea of what your military standard is.

Depends on who you are training with. Obviously you haven't ever trained with a real division like 82nd Airborne or 101st Airborne, not to mention the SF Groups that occupy as well.

I train with U.S. Marines (your so called Elites) as part of Ireland's PFP programme with NATO, and let me tell you, they are nowhere near the level of Britain's regular or territorial army.

No you don't. If you truly knew any Marines, you wouldn't say that.. at least to their faces, luckily here you have a computer screen to hide behind

edit on 26-6-2012 by 31Bravo because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 26 2012 @ 09:24 PM
link   
reply to post by Drunkenparrot
 


Thanks for noticing ! I merey posted that up in reply to someone suggesting Russia and China were about to attack - hilarious i know ! War is mainly about money and there's no money in it for China and Russia, quite the opposite. Doom porn enthusiasts will latch onto any chance to see the world burn.

Does amuse me that the totally wrong guys get stars while the guys with the correct information get none - very telling about belief systems that.
edit on 26-6-2012 by Hopeforeveryone because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 26 2012 @ 09:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by Flavian
reply to post by DevilJonah
 


Any other sources than RT?

Can't find any UK sources saying British troops involved in any action in Syria? Makes me doubt the credibility of the story to be honest. Rightly or wrongly, our media usually bangs the drum for any action involving our forces.


man how dumb are you? American soldiers were already dying in Egypt and the media was still calling for intervention. Sorry but England's army is no different from any other nwo army. They'll do whatever they are told and kill innocent people so the few can have their way. Like it or not the Russian sect of the NWO is the most straight forward out there.
edit on 26-6-2012 by Zedux because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 26 2012 @ 09:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by Hopeforeveryone
reply to post by Power_Semi
 


Sure, look up the statistics for how much the Western countries have invested in China and Russia over the last 30 years and how much Russia and china have invested in the western economies, then get back to me on that one. The end of the cold war was down to economics, guess who won that one.

If we tank as a source for China's products - they're stuffed, they're totally dependant on the west and they know it.
edit on 26-6-2012 by Hopeforeveryone because: (no reason given)


THANK GOD the US still possesses it's major productive capacities right!? Oh no, that all went to China.

Hilarious threat you got there too, like going to a supermarket and yelling; "WITHOUT ME YOU WILL ALL BE BROKE, HAHA!"

Meanwhile, Hopeforeveryone starves to death.

They have the productive capacity and the consumers to buy it, do you think any Chinese company would give a rat's ass if you started a boycot? They'd have a good laugh, the times have changed, without them, you have ZIT, NADA, NO-THING. You are dependent on them for everything, not the other way around, they have products, you need/want products. You don't buy products? Other people will.





new topics
top topics
 
41
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join