Clashes at Republican Guards HQ near Damascus, reports of British forces in Syria

page: 3
41
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join

posted on Jun, 26 2012 @ 10:12 AM
link   
reply to post by thecrippler
 


No, the Syrian State media is claiming foreign born Arab fighters. They haven't come out and said anything about catching any westerners.




posted on Jun, 26 2012 @ 10:14 AM
link   
reply to post by Rocketman7
 


Pakistan will destroy Britain? Are you freaking kidding me?



That has really brightened my day! Was having a bad one too........

Sorry for going off topic OP but come on......that is just so



posted on Jun, 26 2012 @ 10:15 AM
link   
reply to post by Rocketman7
 


Ah yes, only the UK has ever been a bad, bad little country. Every other country on the face of the planet is whiter than white.

History is history mate, if we're gonna play that game I am sure I could paint your country out to a bunch of twats as well.

Also, what exactly is there in Syria we could possibly want to steal?



posted on Jun, 26 2012 @ 10:19 AM
link   

Originally posted by thecrippler
Fox news is talking about his too and quoting their article:

State-run news agency SANA confirmed clashes in the area, claiming that dozens of gunmen attacked civilians and troops in Hammah. SANA said troops fought the attackers, including foreign fighters, killing dozens of them and detaining others.

INCLUDING FOREIGN FIGHTERS, they say... So its at least feasable that these foreigners may be british...


When a country doesn't want to attack themselves, because they are too cowardly, they send in mercenaries.



posted on Jun, 26 2012 @ 10:19 AM
link   

Originally posted by slaine1978
reply to post by Juggernog
 


no
@ u


Its the truth and you know it. England couldnt tie a shoe without US support.



posted on Jun, 26 2012 @ 10:21 AM
link   
reply to post by Rocketman7
 


the sas/sbs
are not mercs



posted on Jun, 26 2012 @ 10:22 AM
link   
reply to post by Juggernog
 


check your history m8
and its not england its britiain


edit on 26/6/12 by slaine1978 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 26 2012 @ 10:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by Juggernog

Originally posted by slaine1978
reply to post by Juggernog
 


no
@ u


Its the truth and you know it. England couldnt tie a shoe without US support.


I thought it was the other way round. You guys told us to back of when we had Osama Bin Laden in our sights. The US couldn't face the horrifying consequences of a non-US military doing the job for them and told the UK SAS to back off.

Also the D-Day landings were nothing short of British Ingenuity, floating fortresses and some amazingly brilliant bluffs against the Axis.

The UK certainly doesn't need the little kid Brother the US to protect ourselves, is this what gets taught at US schools. Incredible, but not surprising. Silly Americans thinking they're the centre of the earth again.



posted on Jun, 26 2012 @ 10:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by slaine1978
reply to post by Juggernog
 


check your history m8
and its not england its britiain


edit on 26/6/12 by slaine1978 because: (no reason given)


The last thing they did unilaterally was the Falklands war, which they barely squeaked by.
England, Britian, UK, whatever.



posted on Jun, 26 2012 @ 10:35 AM
link   

Originally posted by Flavian
reply to post by Rocketman7
 


Pakistan will destroy Britain? Are you freaking kidding me?



That has really brightened my day! Was having a bad one too........

Sorry for going off topic OP but come on......that is just so


These countries are nuclear powers buddy.
Pakistan is a nuclear power.



posted on Jun, 26 2012 @ 10:36 AM
link   
reply to post by Juggernog
 


squeaked by lol? we kicked the crap out of them.
white flag over port stanley



posted on Jun, 26 2012 @ 10:38 AM
link   

Originally posted by Rocketman7

Originally posted by Flavian
reply to post by Rocketman7
 


Pakistan will destroy Britain? Are you freaking kidding me?



That has really brightened my day! Was having a bad one too........

Sorry for going off topic OP but come on......that is just so


These countries are nuclear powers buddy.
Pakistan is a nuclear power.



Read what I said again. Not just Pakistan, they have a coalition n that region against aggression by the west.

And since you obviously don't know much about the situation...

Pakistan.

They are the seventh largest in the world in terms of active troops.


There are 4 billion people in that region. Many of them nuclear powers. And frankly they have had enough of illegal operations by countries seeking to do them harm who wear white hats but do not even follow the Geneva convention.



posted on Jun, 26 2012 @ 10:39 AM
link   
Another ATS thread gone bad. I guess once the original topic has been debunked it always just spirals into a pissing match about something completely off topic.

Way to go kids!!!



posted on Jun, 26 2012 @ 10:40 AM
link   
reply to post by Rocketman7
 


so is the uk.
a far bigger nuclear power too people forget that,
and just coz we go into iraq and afghanistan
with a softly softly approach to win hearts and minds.
dosent mean we couldent kick our way through
and hammer our enemy if thats what was orderd.........



posted on Jun, 26 2012 @ 10:40 AM
link   

Originally posted by slaine1978
reply to post by Juggernog
 


squeaked by lol? we kicked the crap out of them.
white flag over port stanley




I wouldnt call this a route- but whatever, dont really care. Im just bored at work.

link

Casualties


Argentina – 649[88]
Ejército Argentino (Army) – 194 (16 officers, 35 Non-commissioned officers (NCO) and 143 conscript privates)[89]
Armada de la República Argentina (Navy) – 341 (including 321 in Belgrano and 4 naval aviators)
IMARA ( Marines ) – 34[90]
Fuerza Aérea Argentina (Air Force) – 55 (including 31 pilots and 14 ground crew)[91]
Gendarmería Nacional Argentina (Border Guard) – 7
Prefectura Naval Argentina (Coast Guard) – 2
Civilian sailors – 16

United Kingdom – A total of 255 British servicemen and 3 female Falklands Island civilians were killed during the Falklands War.[92]
Royal Navy – 86 + 2 Hong Kong laundrymen (see below)[93]
Royal Marines – 27 (2 officers, 14 NCOs and 11 marines)[94]
Royal Fleet Auxiliary – 4 + 6 Hong Kong sailors[95][96]
Merchant Navy – 6[95]
British Army – 123 (7 officers, 40 NCOs and 76 privates)[97][98][99]
Royal Air Force – 1 (1 officer)[95]
Falklands Islands civilians – 3 women killed by friendly fire[95]
edit on 26-6-2012 by Juggernog because: (no reason given)
edit on 26-6-2012 by Juggernog because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 26 2012 @ 10:41 AM
link   
reply to post by Rocketman7
 


No point in a pissing match.

Staying on topic, any other sources yet for British involvement? Or just more RT rubbish?
edit on 26-6-2012 by Flavian because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 26 2012 @ 10:46 AM
link   
reply to post by Juggernog
 


actualy 255 British, 650 Argentine, and 3 Falkland Islanders.

www.bbc.co.uk...


edit on 26/6/12 by slaine1978 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 26 2012 @ 10:51 AM
link   

Originally posted by rigel4
reply to post by DevilJonah
 


With any luck our commandos will get into the presidential palace, find the criminal Bashar,
and execute him. Doesn't matter what the Russians do then, because Assad will be dead
and can't be saved.

Russians government is nothing more than Mafioso..........


Clearly you are uneducated. It's not Assad Russia cares about.



posted on Jun, 26 2012 @ 10:51 AM
link   
The article states that unconfirmed reports of British troops helping.

The key word is unconfirmed.

It could just be a psych against the government troops. They know they will get their butts kicked if the Brits are involved.



posted on Jun, 26 2012 @ 10:53 AM
link   
reply to post by princeofpeace
 


You took the words right out of my mouth. I actually made a post about stuff like that! This forum is filled with a bunch of teenagers comparing shlong sizes! Screw the main points, its all about flexing the computer muscles and beating their chests with monkey pride!

Lets get back on topic..





new topics
top topics
 
41
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join