Clashes at Republican Guards HQ near Damascus, reports of British forces in Syria, page 3


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 41 times


reply posted on 26-6-2012 @ 10:12 AM by stumason
reply to post by thecrippler



No, the Syrian State media is claiming foreign born Arab fighters. They haven't come out and said anything about catching any westerners.


reply posted on 26-6-2012 @ 10:14 AM by Flavian
reply to post by Rocketman7



Pakistan will destroy Britain? Are you freaking kidding me?



That has really brightened my day! Was having a bad one too........

Sorry for going off topic OP but come on......that is just so


reply posted on 26-6-2012 @ 10:15 AM by stumason
reply to post by Rocketman7



Ah yes, only the UK has ever been a bad, bad little country. Every other country on the face of the planet is whiter than white.

History is history mate, if we're gonna play that game I am sure I could paint your country out to a bunch of twats as well.

Also, what exactly is there in Syria we could possibly want to steal?



reply posted on 26-6-2012 @ 10:19 AM by Rocketman7
Originally posted by thecrippler
Fox news is
talking about his too and quoting their article:
State-run news agency SANA confirmed clashes in the area, claiming that dozens of gunmen attacked civilians and troops in Hammah. SANA said troops fought the attackers, including foreign fighters, killing dozens of them and detaining others.

INCLUDING FOREIGN FIGHTERS, they say... So its at least feasable that these foreigners may be british...


When a country doesn't want to attack themselves, because they are too cowardly, they send in mercenaries.


reply posted on 26-6-2012 @ 10:19 AM by Juggernog
Originally posted by slaine1978
reply to
post by Juggernog



no @ u


Its the truth and you know it. England couldnt tie a shoe without US support.


reply posted on 26-6-2012 @ 10:22 AM by slaine1978
reply to post by Juggernog



check your history m8
and its not england its britiain


edit on 26/6/12 by slaine1978 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 26-6-2012 @ 10:32 AM by mr-lizard
Originally posted by Juggernog
Originally posted by slaine1978
reply to
post by Juggernog



no @ u


Its the truth and you know it. England couldnt tie a shoe without US support.


I thought it was the other way round. You guys told us to back of when we had Osama Bin Laden in our sights. The US couldn't face the horrifying consequences of a non-US military doing the job for them and told the UK SAS to back off.

Also the D-Day landings were nothing short of British Ingenuity, floating fortresses and some amazingly brilliant bluffs against the Axis.

The UK certainly doesn't need the little kid Brother the US to protect ourselves, is this what gets taught at US schools. Incredible, but not surprising. Silly Americans thinking they're the centre of the earth again.


reply posted on 26-6-2012 @ 10:32 AM by Juggernog
Originally posted by slaine1978
reply to
post by Juggernog



check your history m8
and its not england its britiain


edit on 26/6/12 by slaine1978 because: (no reason given)


The last thing they did unilaterally was the Falklands war, which they barely squeaked by.
England, Britian, UK, whatever.


reply posted on 26-6-2012 @ 10:35 AM by Rocketman7
Originally posted by Flavian
reply to
post by Rocketman7



Pakistan will destroy Britain? Are you freaking kidding me?



That has really brightened my day! Was having a bad one too........

Sorry for going off topic OP but come on......that is just so


These countries are nuclear powers buddy.
Pakistan is a nuclear power.


reply posted on 26-6-2012 @ 10:36 AM by slaine1978
reply to post by Juggernog



squeaked by lol? we kicked the crap out of them.
white flag over port stanley


reply posted on 26-6-2012 @ 10:38 AM by Rocketman7
Originally posted by Rocketman7
Originally posted by Flavian
reply to
post by Rocketman7



Pakistan will destroy Britain? Are you freaking kidding me?



That has really brightened my day! Was having a bad one too........

Sorry for going off topic OP but come on......that is just so


These countries are nuclear powers buddy.
Pakistan is a nuclear power.



Read what I said again. Not just Pakistan, they have a coalition n that region against aggression by the west.

And since you obviously don't know much about the situation...

Pakistan.
They are the seventh largest in the world in terms of active troops.


There are 4 billion people in that region. Many of them nuclear powers. And frankly they have had enough of illegal operations by countries seeking to do them harm who wear white hats but do not even follow the Geneva convention.



reply posted on 26-6-2012 @ 10:40 AM by slaine1978
reply to post by Rocketman7



so is the uk.
a far bigger nuclear power too people forget that,
and just coz we go into iraq and afghanistan
with a softly softly approach to win hearts and minds.
dosent mean we couldent kick our way through
and hammer our enemy if thats what was orderd.........


reply posted on 26-6-2012 @ 10:40 AM by Juggernog
Originally posted by slaine1978
reply to
post by Juggernog



squeaked by lol? we kicked the crap out of them.
white flag over port stanley



I wouldnt call this a route- but whatever, dont really care. Im just bored at work.

link

Casualties

Argentina – 649[88]
Ejército Argentino (Army) – 194 (16 officers, 35 Non-commissioned officers (NCO) and 143 conscript privates)[89]
Armada de la República Argentina (Navy) – 341 (including 321 in Belgrano and 4 naval aviators)
IMARA ( Marines ) – 34[90]
Fuerza Aérea Argentina (Air Force) – 55 (including 31 pilots and 14 ground crew)[91]
Gendarmería Nacional Argentina (Border Guard) – 7
Prefectura Naval Argentina (Coast Guard) – 2
Civilian sailors – 16

United Kingdom – A total of 255 British servicemen and 3 female Falklands Island civilians were killed during the Falklands War.[92]
Royal Navy – 86 + 2 Hong Kong laundrymen (see below)[93]
Royal Marines – 27 (2 officers, 14 NCOs and 11 marines)[94]
Royal Fleet Auxiliary – 4 + 6 Hong Kong sailors[95][96]
Merchant Navy – 6[95]
British Army – 123 (7 officers, 40 NCOs and 76 privates)[97][98][99]
Royal Air Force – 1 (1 officer)[95]
Falklands Islands civilians – 3 women killed by friendly fire[95]
edit on 26-6-2012 by Juggernog because: (no reason given)
edit on 26-6-2012 by Juggernog because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 26-6-2012 @ 10:41 AM by Flavian
reply to post by Rocketman7



No point in a pissing match.

Staying on topic, any other sources yet for British involvement? Or just more RT rubbish?
edit on 26-6-2012 by Flavian because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 26-6-2012 @ 10:46 AM by slaine1978
reply to post by Juggernog



actualy 255 British, 650 Argentine, and 3 Falkland Islanders.

www.bbc.co.uk...


edit on 26/6/12 by slaine1978 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 26-6-2012 @ 10:51 AM by Ryanssuperman
Originally posted by rigel4
reply to
post by DevilJonah



With any luck our commandos will get into the presidential palace, find the criminal Bashar,
and execute him. Doesn't matter what the Russians do then, because Assad will be dead
and can't be saved.

Russians government is nothing more than Mafioso..........


Clearly you are uneducated. It's not Assad Russia cares about.


reply posted on 26-6-2012 @ 10:53 AM by imagineering
reply to post by princeofpeace



You took the words right out of my mouth. I actually made a post about stuff like that! This forum is filled with a bunch of teenagers comparing shlong sizes! Screw the main points, its all about flexing the computer muscles and beating their chests with monkey pride!

Lets get back on topic..
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Israel Uses a 13 Year Old Boy as a Human Shield
  Posted 15 days ago with 38 member flags
The Most Outrageous Hateful Rhetoric of All Time
  Posted 16 days ago with 37 member flags
US Preparing for a Post-Israel Middle East?
  Posted 12 days ago with 26 member flags
Iran Bashing, Terrorism and Who Chose The Chosen People, Anyway?
  Posted 16 days ago with 21 member flags