It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A mysterious ancient building in Syria, described as a 'landscape for the dead' could be as old as 10,000 years ago - far older than the Great Pyramid. But scientists have been unable to explore the ruins, unearthed in 2009, because of the conflict in the region. The strange stone formations were uncovered in 2009, by archaeologist Robert Mason of the Royal Ontario Museum, who came across stone lines, circles, and tombs in a near-lifeless area of desert. Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk... 1yrFGhhEJ
In a talk in 2010, Mason said he felt like he’d stumbled onto England’s Salisbury Plain, where Stonehenge is located, leading to the formations being dubbed “Syria’s Stonehenge.” Mason also talked about the monastery, Deir Mar Musa. Early work on the building likely began in the late 4th or early 5th century. It was occupied until the 1800s, though damaged repeatedly by earthquakes. Following refurbishment in the 1980s and 1990s, it became active again. Mason thinks the monastery was originally a Roman watchtower that was partially destroyed by an earthquake and then rebuilt. The compound was enlarged, with new structures added until it reached the size of the modern complex, clinging to a dry cliff face in the desert about 50 miles north of Damascus. Mason was searching Roman watchtowers when he came across the stone lines, circles, and possible tombs.
Originally posted by WorkingClassMan
Really sh%$s me when things like this can't be available for investigation and the world to see, so much history lost already I just hope someone has marked it to avoid on any upcoming bombing raids.
I'm sure someone has had a decent look through by now.
Originally posted by kdog1982
I don't know about a "stonehenge".
Maybe a roman watchtower?
phys.org...
Originally posted by BulletShogun
Originally posted by kdog1982
I don't know about a "stonehenge".
Maybe a roman watchtower?
phys.org...
Bit big for a watchtower.
Originally posted by kdog1982
Originally posted by BulletShogun
Originally posted by kdog1982
I don't know about a "stonehenge".
Maybe a roman watchtower?
phys.org...
Bit big for a watchtower.
I see you did not quote the quote........
Maybe you should read the article.
The oldest structures belong to what archaeologists call the early Pre-Pottery Neolithic A period, which ended around 9000 B.C. Strangely enough, the later remains, which date to the Pre-Pottery Neolithic B period, or about 8000 B.C., are less elaborate. The earliest levels contain most of the T-shaped pillars and animal sculptures.
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
www.dailymail.co.uk...
Originally posted by Shadow Herder
Originally posted by WorkingClassMan
Really sh%$s me when things like this can't be available for investigation and the world to see, so much history lost already I just hope someone has marked it to avoid on any upcoming bombing raids.
I'm sure someone has had a decent look through by now.
Some of the worlds greatest archaeological sites lay beneath some of the worlds greatest cities. Truth.
Originally posted by BulletShogun
Looks nice. I wonder what we could learn from this.
It looks like it would be residential housing of the day but i know some idiot will call it some super temple to some god nobody knows about