It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In short: there is enough information in that small bit of image to deduce that it is a triangle shaped object.
LASCO C2, the orange picture, has a shutter speed of about 26 seconds.
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
You think a spacecraft travelling fast enough to only appear in one image, not in the images recorded minutes before or after, basically stops for 26 seconds to pose for SOHO? Really?
Sure, why not? Appearantly cosmic rays are doing that.
Cosmic rays: High energy particles from the solar wind, and from the galaxy as a whole, whip around the SOHO spacecraft and interact with the detectors. These produce spots and streaks on the detector ranging from a single pixel, to large streaks that span a large fraction of the image.
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
No, they're not. No one is saying these images show cosmic rays traveling through space. They are strikes on the CCD sensor.
Cosmic rays: High energy particles from the solar wind, and from the galaxy as a whole, whip around the SOHO spacecraft and interact with the detectors. These produce spots and streaks on the detector ranging from a single pixel, to large streaks that span a large fraction of the image.
SOHO
Yes, I am acutely aware of how CCD devices work.
Sure, why not? Appearantly cosmic rays are doing that.
The "official" explaination given by NASA for this is much like the "lint" on the lens. An occasional event giving the impression of an "object". I've already stated elsewhere that this is wholly BS on NASA's part (class 100 clean rooms and all that). And while this is an explaination that can be easily received by the masses, it is hardly truth.
Given the randomness of cosmic rays and other "energies", a single occurance of such a shape is virtually impossible
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
when I asked if you thought a spacecraft stopped to pose for SOHO? There's nothing similar between a cosmic ray strike on the sensor and an imaginary triangle flying through space and pausing for publicity.
"The "official" explaination given by NASA for this is much like the "lint" on the lens. An occasional event giving the impression of an "object". I've already stated elsewhere that this is wholly BS on NASA's part (class 100 clean rooms and all that). And while this is an explaination that can be easily received by the masses, it is hardly truth."
but if you post a link to an existing thread of your choice on this subject I'd be happy to debate it there.
Says who? This is simply your own speculative fantasy.
About your suggested science experiment, what in the hell are you trying to say and why leave the lens cap on?
In theory, you should be able to "see" nearly the same random cosmic ray "strikes" on your camera's CCD.
I put it that way because neither needs to "stop and pose". And, just what would be the differences?
I don't wish to debate something that should never happen. I said this to illustrate that NASA is not above lying about the technology and/or its assembly methods to avoid trying to answer a question they can't answer.
Originally posted by kerazeesicko
This is so freaking annoying....when someone who knows absolutely nothing about what they are looking at decides to start a thread about SOHO...and claim it is ET.
If you have no damn clue as to how to interpret something ...ASK..instead of making a thread claiming alien ships are near the sun.
Posted by Anathema, myself, in the Original Post.
Here is a newly posted image from earlier today of what appears to be some sort of craft, anomaly or image artifact near the Sun. Its info says its from SOHO Lasco C2 June 24 2012. Curious as to what you all think. I am no expert on SOHO or its images so I have no idea what this is. Hopefully one of you can shed some light on the matter. Thanks.
- Anath3ma
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
You don't see the difference? The cosmic rays seen in the image are strikes on the sensor, not seen out flying around in space. Would a craft appear so sharp in the image with a 26 second exposure? What's it matter really, I'm talking to someone who believes in 2 sided triangles?
But you did and you are. If you think that fiber is really something outside the instrument in space then post a link to the thread of your choice.
if you truly wish to ignore the math involved here
Please understand, I'm not saying it is an Andromedan Starship, only that the ship may be a possibility.
the probability of an image like that being cosmic rays is orders of magnitude less. Making it far more likely to be an object.
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
The 1 mm fiber, I really don't care what you buy about it or not, or what shouldn't be. Name the thread where you want me to shred your delusions of that fiber being anything out in space for 6-1/2 years or drop it.
the probability of an image like that being cosmic rays is orders of magnitude less. Making it far more likely to be an object.
We're done.
Would a craft appear so sharp in the image with a 26 second exposure?
You call that "sharp"?!?? I'm sorry man, but, if you truly wish to ignore the math involved here, perhaps I should just let you go back to sleep.
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
Where's the math on that? Not concerned with your odds making.