Poll - who won the V presidential debate?, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 5-10-2004 @ 10:36 PM by slank
Bush and Cheney are incompetent to handle the war on terror.
Bremer - Not enough troops on the ground.
Rumsfeld - No solid evidence linking Saddam with 911.
No WMDs.
The FBI not translating tapes:
Since Sept. 11, more than 123,000 hours of audio in languages associated with counterterrorism cases have not been reviewed.
cnn.aimtoday.cnn.com.../ff/story/0002%2F20040928%2F0636514838.htm&sc=rontz

Bush and Cheney are FAILURES on the war on terrorism.
They have NOT gotten Osama Bin Laden.
They are creating more terrorists in Iraq and creating a sanctuary for them there.

John F. Kerry and John Edwards will keep there focus on ACTUAL terrorists and not be sidetracked going after Daddie's leftover problem.

John F. Kerry and John Edwards will round up nuclear materials in the old Soviet Union in FOUR years, NOT THIRTEEN years.

John F. Kerry and John Edwards will not alienate the ENTIRE world against America.

I will breathe SO MUCH easier when they occupy the whitehouse.
.


reply posted on 5-10-2004 @ 10:39 PM by SomewhereinBetween
Originally posted by mad scientist
Originally posted by SomewhereinBetween

Despite this, and through most of the debate I thought it too close to call, but in the end, the last two questions in fact pulled Edwards ahead. His summary closed the deal. In true fashion he showed what it takes TO WIN, and how to win. His summation delivered to the average American hope, tugged at what is personal for them and declared he and Kerry understand.


Well what can you expect from an ambulance chaser who's job it is to tug on people's heart strings.


Let's examine that statement of yours.

You or your loved one is hit by a drunk driver, or impaired for the rest of your life by an incompetent doctor, or severely injured to the point that you cannot walk again because you were unfortunate enough to be driving that lemon where the tires blew on your car. What do you do, defend yourself against the trial lawyers representing the doctor's multi-billion dollar insurance company, or do you look to someone who also knows the law?

Now consider, if not for trial lawyers on the side of the injured party, who eexactly would protect you against the conglomerates, mega-corporations and professional incompetents, and what would force those conglomerates, mega-corporations and incompetent professionals to set appropriate standards and fix their flaws?

Next, explain to me exactly why trial lawyers are such anathema when they argue their case, and it is the judge and the jury which decides the outcome?

Finally, why blame the trial lawyers for the outrageous awards in a system where capitalism is next to Godliness?
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



DEA is Investigating Montana State Legislators Over State Laws
  Posted 12 days ago with 59 member flags
The CIA in Australia: America\'s Foreign Watergate
  Posted 2 days ago with 19 member flags
Who is really behind the birthers and what is their real motive?
  Posted 12 days ago with 11 member flags
ESF and Black op funding.
  Posted 10 days ago with 11 member flags
There is NO Media Bias in America
  Posted 11 days ago with 10 member flags