was it a plane?

www.youtube.com...


that is all

reply to post by shaneslaughta


Yes it was a plane. That is all.

reply to post by shaneslaughta


And to think, people like you call others "sheeple". Does it make you feel good to be sucked into believing a HOAX video is real?

i believe what i see. i believe that anything you dont like to see is called hoax. you all put your head into the sand as it is easier that trying to uncover the truth.


www.youtube.com...

I'm gonna pretend I didn't come in on this thread and go a feed the pigs, did you know they fly to

You do not need to see video footage of it happening to know that it was not a plane. The whole says it all. You do not need to find more evidence then the footage of the towers to know that the planes did not bring down those 3 towers.

you all make comments and yet you leave no proof to the contrary.

Originally posted by shaneslaughta
you all make comments and yet you leave no proof to the contrary.

B.B.B.But Fox News told me it was an Airplane! No one seems to have seen it, but Fox News told me, so obviously it is true!

Seriously, 9/11 should be a non-issue at this point, the only people still believing that arab / muslim terrorists and their leader who was hiding in a cave, concocted the most elaborate attack on America, are those who are easily and willfully led on.

I understand it, I do. It was a very emotional / traumatic time, and dealing with those emotions can be hard. I mean, how does one deal with knowing their government allowed 3000 of their citizens get murdered, so that we could perpetuate illegal wars for profit, while depopulating the earth.

Peace.

reply to post by Infi8nity


Yessssss! Well said!

The pen- a - gone jet one is weird, here's why. I seen an airliner specialist talking on a youtube video about this. He has been working on major jets for ages. He understands all there flight capabilities. And what he said was that a jumbo jet simply can't fly narrowly above the ground like that. It's impossible.

Sure a jet can land, so it's got it's landing gear down, enginees drawn back to a minimal thrust, flapps completely down, but even then think about this where's the nose of the jumbo jet? Way way up? Like 5 stores higher than the rest of the jet. That way the back landing gear hit first, then the front comes down. So do you see how different that is than a Jet flying 100 % horizontally to the ground?

Jumbo jets can't fly 100% horizontally along the ground. The reason is that there's some kind of air pressure bubble that would happen just below the jet and the ground. Something to do with physics that guy was saying. He said that the Jet simply can't fly like that in real life. The air pressure between the ground and the belly of the jet would be too high. The minimum cealling of these jets is like 100 ft or something for actual flight. Also there's no debree of the jet. There would be jet parts everywhere if that was a jet.

Also one other thing. This has to do with all the jets. They were 767's if I got it right. A 767 I believe is equipt with a computer system that doesn't allow the pilot to do certain things. It won't allow the pilot to fly directly into a high rise building. It won't allow the pilot to fly the jet too low to the ground. Like you drop the plane and at 1000 ft something kicks in and says Mimimum ceiling reached. This isn't a crop duster that you can do whatever you want with it. The computer system is designed to take over in many cases. Like if a pilot has a heart attack. The plane can make it to the destination and even land itself if it doesn't get a responce from the pilot. Google that if you don't believe me. Most jumbo jets land themselves, especially in bad weather. In good weather the pilot will land it manually in order to practice a manual landing so that if the computer ever fails they can land it manually. So all this stuff about people flying planes into buildings I think is complete BS.

Like if we saw the jet land into the pent gone that's one thing. But it didn't it flew in as they claim. So it wasn't a jet. It likely was a dummy missile. Then a charge set off inside the building.

its sad but true, msm has spoon fed the populous into believing there dribble. it really is a dumbing down of the masses to swindle and push corporate agendas and yet most people dont wanna see the truth as long as they have there over priced iphones and 3d televisions. your tech and comfort that you all think you deserve is your perpetual undoing. you pay and pay for things but get boned on health insurance medical coverage food and fuel costs. your govt gives out billions to help other countrys because its politically correct after invading them. yet it lets its own people go without. i bet you support walmart and other Chinese importing junk shops. and you have the nerve to belittle me and my beliefs about a video? lolololol

and the truth about the missing money they day before..........come on. then people have to say it was a plane.......your taking the data from the govt showing you it "was" a plane. please show me a third party with radar cross section of a plane. a party that has nothing to gain or loose.

reply to post by r2d246


You're talking about Ground Effect, and it's NOTHING like that. There is a point where the wingspan and the altitude above ground match, and at that altitude the air pressure under the aircraft causes a "bounce". That doesn't mean that a plane CAN'T fly low, it just means that if you don't watch for it, it's going to cause you to climb some, until the wing span and altitude don't match up anymore. You can go below it simply by cutting power, or easing forward on the stick, carefully.

And the Boeing 757 is NOT a jumbo jet by any stretch of the imagination.

Ground effect:
www.se-technology.com...

REAL jumbo jet flying extremely low level to the ground:

www.youtube.com...
www.youtube.com...

Gear down on this one, but just because it's fun.
www.youtube.com...

NO airplane has a computer system that "won't allow a pilot to fly into a high rise building". The airplane can't see what's ahead (except for weather or terrain), and it won't stop a pilot from crashing into something. But there were two 767s and two 757s on 9/11. There is no computer system that will take over if the pilots don't respond either. There is nothing they have to push in a certain amount of time to tell the computer if they're alive and well.

The system you are talking about for the computer flying and landing is the autopilot and autolanding system. They have to receive certain information from the ground (ILS and DME) for them to work properly (at least the autolanding system does).

reply to post by Infi8nity


Was that the "Whole" hole? I can't take a post seriously that the writer doesn't know the difference between whole and hole, and than and then etc....

It was a plane and that is spelled PLANE!!

Get out and get some fresh air once in a while and you will see the world in a different light.

On September 11, 2001, the Pentagon was attacked by a flying white blob.

Welcome to the world of 911 disinformation. These topics are meant to derail you for a long time away from the real evidence that exists.

Investigate ptech, israeli involvement, amdocs, Art students , air schools, israeli spies. Operation Amalgam Virgo, Vigilante guardian for starters.

Originally posted by shaneslaughta
www.youtube.com...

No it was not a plane. It was a manned-missile and we have video evidence of it here just before it hit the Pentagon: www.youtube.com... Some have questioned the authenticity of the video, but trust me, it is authentic. Pass this video on to as many Truthers as you can.

There was already a (at least one) thread on this video:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

reply to post by lunarasparagus

Christ, that's actually a pretty convincing video. Just wondering why I've never seen it before.

Fakery vs. Debunkery:

(ETA) See the original video footage HERE.